23.07.2013 Views

Geriatric Mental Health Disaster and Emergency Preparedness

Geriatric Mental Health Disaster and Emergency Preparedness

Geriatric Mental Health Disaster and Emergency Preparedness

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

86 <strong>Geriatric</strong> <strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Disaster</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Emergency</strong> <strong>Preparedness</strong><br />

regarding older persons, including observations that pertain to mental<br />

health issues, have been extrapolated from research studies on these<br />

events, as well as from a major study on emergency response capacity conducted<br />

by the Canadian Red Cross. We have chosen to highlight these<br />

studies given their explicit inclusion of older persons as a population of<br />

interest rather than conduct a comprehensive review of all disaster-related<br />

literature on Canadian situations. That said, it should be noted that the<br />

Canadian disaster literature regarding older persons is relatively sparse<br />

overall.<br />

Red River Manitoba Floods<br />

In 1997, the Red River in Manitoba, a province in Canada, flooded, resulting<br />

in the evacuation of 28,000 people <strong>and</strong> $500 million in damage to<br />

property <strong>and</strong> infrastructure (Etkin, Haque, & Brooks, 2003). Buckl<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> Rahman (1999) conducted a study to examine the relationship between<br />

community preparedness for the disaster <strong>and</strong> the level <strong>and</strong> pattern<br />

of community development in three rural communities. Research was conducted<br />

through key informant interviews that included elderly residents,<br />

focus groups with emergency personnel, <strong>and</strong> a household survey. The communities<br />

differed significantly in their ethnicity <strong>and</strong> level of community<br />

development, <strong>and</strong> results indicate the level of community development did<br />

indeed have an impact on the communities’ response to disaster. One community<br />

of First Nations’ peoples was particularly affected. First Nations’<br />

communities are under federal jurisdiction in Canada, whereas the central<br />

disaster planning agency is a provincial responsibility, which complicates<br />

disaster preparation <strong>and</strong> management. Researchers suggested this community’s<br />

long-st<strong>and</strong>ing social isolation <strong>and</strong> the weak relationship between<br />

the community <strong>and</strong> different government levels meant there were fewer<br />

resources for managing disaster response <strong>and</strong> a less robust population,<br />

from a public health perspective, to manage disaster recovery. The two<br />

communities described as having stronger social capital had the resources<br />

to better manage the disaster.<br />

Study participants agreed that the m<strong>and</strong>atory government evacuation<br />

order, which applied to the young, elderly, <strong>and</strong> disabled, was necessary;<br />

however, they raised concerns about the process by which the order was<br />

communicated <strong>and</strong> implemented. Buckl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Rahman (1999) concluded<br />

their study by emphasizing the critical need for close connections<br />

<strong>and</strong> more respectful <strong>and</strong> open communication between communities <strong>and</strong><br />

government.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!