23.07.2013 Views

Geriatric Mental Health Disaster and Emergency Preparedness

Geriatric Mental Health Disaster and Emergency Preparedness

Geriatric Mental Health Disaster and Emergency Preparedness

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

122 <strong>Geriatric</strong> <strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Disaster</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Emergency</strong> <strong>Preparedness</strong><br />

train-the-trainer model, FEMA offers the curriculum for Community<br />

<strong>Emergency</strong> Response Team (CERT) training <strong>and</strong> relies on local communities<br />

for implementation via traditional first responders. Despite a national<br />

effort to provide community preparedness coverage through these<br />

programs, coordinated communication about program training <strong>and</strong> effectiveness<br />

was only initiated in September 2008 (Community <strong>Emergency</strong><br />

Response Team, 2008). While FEMA has acknowledged the need for including<br />

nongovernmental entities, citizens, <strong>and</strong> communities in emergency<br />

preparedness (i.e., in its National Response Framework, training course<br />

catalog, Citizen Corps, <strong>and</strong> CERT program), the lack of focused, coordinated,<br />

or integrated training for these groups reflects a gap in existing preparedness<br />

efforts.<br />

Focus on Citizen <strong>Preparedness</strong><br />

Kits Rather Than Skills<br />

<strong>Emergency</strong> preparedness messages for individual citizens in the United<br />

States have focused on concrete actions <strong>and</strong> checklists. The Department<br />

of Homel<strong>and</strong> Security’s Ready America Web site lists three steps to preparedness:<br />

1) get a kit, 2) make a plan, <strong>and</strong> 3) be informed (Department of<br />

Homel<strong>and</strong> Security, 2008c). Rather than viewing preparedness as an evolving<br />

process (Perry & Lindell, 2003), these messages limit preparedness<br />

activities to household-level kits, emergency plans, <strong>and</strong> a readiness quotient<br />

quiz. While there is a need for individual-level preparedness, these activities<br />

cannot end with a document or a bag of supplies; training, drills,<br />

<strong>and</strong> critique must provide the opportunity to develop skills vital to emergency<br />

planning <strong>and</strong> response (Perry & Lindell). Additionally, the isolation<br />

of individuals from the community in disaster planning ignores the experience<br />

of disaster as a community-level phenomenon (Norris, 2002) <strong>and</strong> the<br />

importance of social <strong>and</strong> family networks in emergency response, especially<br />

for vulnerable populations. Without developing skills to accompany a preparedness<br />

kit or emergency plan, <strong>and</strong> without making links to broader<br />

networks, individual preparedness activities based on existing federal messages<br />

fail to ensure adequate preparedness for safety <strong>and</strong> response.<br />

Lack of Community-Level Drills<br />

Despite the demonstrated importance of community in disaster response,<br />

emergency response simulation exercises have been targeted to first re-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!