23.12.2013 Views

the syntax and semantics of relativization and quantification

the syntax and semantics of relativization and quantification

the syntax and semantics of relativization and quantification

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

193<br />

have like a subject in o<strong>the</strong>r constructions. This syntactic movitation permitted<br />

adherence to <strong>the</strong> Mapping Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, which says that an indefinite which is subject<br />

to existential closure must be interpreted within <strong>the</strong> verb phrase (which I take<br />

to be vP). The indefiniteness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> associate is in line with <strong>the</strong> definiteness effect<br />

seen in existential constructions cross-linguistically. I have analyzed CQ possessive<br />

sentences, which seem to have a specific/definite DP (with an explicit prenominal<br />

possessor) in an existential construction, by suggesting that <strong>the</strong> possessor raises out<br />

<strong>of</strong> its DP at LF, in parallel to overt movement which has been postulated in English<br />

<strong>and</strong> French by Kayne [1994] <strong>and</strong> in Hungarian by Szabolcsi [1994].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!