28.05.2014 Views

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

observed between the formwork and cast concrete (Figure 6(a)), while the member made with the U-shaped<br />

formwork (SU) failed with the formation of a flexural crack in the middle. For the beam members BF1 and<br />

BU1, made with flat plate and U-shaped formwork respectively, BF1 failed by delamination (Figure 6(c)) at a<br />

loading much lower than that of BU1, which failed in flexure (Figure 6(d). For BU1, the failure load was<br />

higher than that predicted from conventional reinforced concrete theory. When the amount of GFRP in the<br />

formwork was further increased, as in BU2, delamination failure occurs despite the use of U-shaped formwork.<br />

However, delamination also led to a significantly higher deformation at failure.<br />

16<br />

SU<br />

14<br />

SF<br />

Load(kN)<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90<br />

Displacement(mm)<br />

(a) Slabs SF & SU<br />

120<br />

BU1<br />

100<br />

BF1<br />

BU2<br />

80<br />

Load(kN)<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45<br />

Displacement(mm)<br />

(b) Beams BF1, BU1&BU2<br />

Figure 5 Test Results for the Various Beams<br />

-121-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!