r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
correlation plots of wind vs acceleration and/or dynamic strain results. <strong>The</strong> second type is deployed for the<br />
monitoring of horizontal winds above 45 m/s and for the correlation analysis of wind vs displacement and/or<br />
static strain results. <strong>The</strong> third type is deployed for the monitoring/calibration of the horizontal wind directions<br />
determined by the ultrasonic anemometers. <strong>The</strong> first and second types are also deployed for the monitoring of<br />
the wind turbulence coherence characteristics by installing the anemometers around 20~30 meters apart from<br />
each other (longitudinally – or along the bridge-deck alignment). <strong>The</strong> barometers (RM Young 61202) and<br />
rainfall gauges (Casella 103800D) are deployed for the calibration of and/or making references to the wind<br />
speeds taken by the anemometers, in particular under the condition of extreme heavy rains.<br />
<strong>The</strong> functions of the software tools for wind and weather monitoring are : (i) to derive the relevant wind and<br />
weather monitoring parameters such as wind turbulence characteristics, the frequency response functions and<br />
the correlation plots of wind vs responses, and (ii) to output the measured/derived results in the standardized<br />
format of four –in-one format, i.e. 3 graphs and 1 table on one page. <strong>The</strong> 3 graphs are location plan of bridge<br />
site, location of sensors in bridge, graphical report of monitoring results, and a legend-table to monitoring results,<br />
as shown in Figures 32-39 and 43-45. <strong>The</strong> flow diagram of the software tools for wind and weather monitoring<br />
is shown in Figure 11. In Figure 11, the fundamental wind data analysis should be carried out first before the<br />
execution of other types of analysis. <strong>The</strong> details of this fundamental wind data analysis are tabulated in Table 5,<br />
as an example of fundamental wind data analysis for wind data collected from 3D ultrasonic type anemometers.<br />
B. Customized Software Tools for Temperature Monitoring [Ref. 15, 17 and 24]<br />
<strong>The</strong> temperature monitoring in Stonecutters Bridge is devised to monitor the temperature in five types of<br />
materials, i.e., structural steel sections (steel deck sections and steel tower skin sections), structural concrete<br />
sections (concrete deck sections and concrete tower sections), cable steel sections, air (un-shaded, shaded, and<br />
inside section) and asphalt pavement. Due to different installation requirements and measuring materials, the<br />
temperature sensors are classified as seven types, i.e. TMU-1, TMU-2, TMU-3, TMU-4, TMU-5, TMU-6 and<br />
TMU-7. TMU-1 and TMU-2 are both for structural steel temperature measurement, in which the former is bolt<br />
fixed type and the latter is bond mount type. TMU-3 and TMU-4 are both for structural concrete temperature<br />
measurement, in which the former is for tower and the latter is for deck. TMU-5 is for cable steel temperature<br />
measurement. TMU-6 is for air temperature and relative humidity (thermo transmitter type) measurement.<br />
TMU-7 is for asphalt pavement temperature measurement. All temperature sensors are Class A Platinum<br />
Resistance <strong>The</strong>rmometry except TMU-5 which is distributed optical fiber sensors (based on Raman scattering<br />
process).<br />
Two major parameters are required for temperature monitoring of structural steel sections and they are the<br />
effective temperature and the differential temperature. In order to derive these two parameters in the orthotropic<br />
steel deck section, the temperature sensors should be distributed along the top and bottom deck plate-trough<br />
sections and the web plates. <strong>The</strong> computational method for effective and differential temperatures basing on<br />
such arrangement of temperature sensors is shown in Figure 12. In a similar way, the effective temperature and<br />
differential temperatures in structural concrete sections are determined. Differential temperature in steel cable,<br />
tower skin and asphalt pavement is not required (as the respective diameter, thickness and depth are comparative<br />
small) and only the average (or effective) temperature is required. <strong>The</strong> effective temperature is normally used to<br />
estimate the thermal movement of the structural component and to calibrate/eliminate thermal effects for other<br />
aspects of monitoring such as stay forces monitoring. <strong>The</strong> flow diagram of the software tools for temperature<br />
monitoring is shown in Figure 13.<br />
C. Customized Software Tools for Seismic Monitoring [Ref. 10, 15 and 17]<br />
In an earthquake, no actual force is applied to the bridge. Instead, the ground moves back and forth (and/or up<br />
and down) and this movement induces inertial forces that then deform the bridge. It is the displacements in the<br />
bridge, relative to the moving base, that impose deformations on the bridge. Through the elastic properties, these<br />
deformations cause elastic forces to develop in the individual members and connections. Earthquake ground<br />
motions usually are imposed through the use of the ground acceleration records. In Stonecutters Bridge, if an<br />
earthquake with a Modified Mercalli Scale of 5 or more is occurred, the time-series acceleration data at<br />
tower-base will be used to generate the response spectrum of the bridge at a certain level of damping (which is<br />
5% according to Design Memorandum of Stonecutters Bridge). <strong>The</strong> spectrum is obtained by repeated solving<br />
the dynamic equilibrium equations (expressed in terms of bridge’s circular frequency) by Newmark’s method<br />
with the input of the recorded time-series acceleration data (in a time increment of 0.02 seconds) for the bridge<br />
with various circular frequencies and then plotting the peak displacement obtained for that circular frequency (ω)<br />
versus the frequency for which the displacement was obtained. <strong>The</strong> velocity (or pseudo-velocity) response<br />
-248-