28.05.2014 Views

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

correlation plots of wind vs acceleration and/or dynamic strain results. <strong>The</strong> second type is deployed for the<br />

monitoring of horizontal winds above 45 m/s and for the correlation analysis of wind vs displacement and/or<br />

static strain results. <strong>The</strong> third type is deployed for the monitoring/calibration of the horizontal wind directions<br />

determined by the ultrasonic anemometers. <strong>The</strong> first and second types are also deployed for the monitoring of<br />

the wind turbulence coherence characteristics by installing the anemometers around 20~30 meters apart from<br />

each other (longitudinally – or along the bridge-deck alignment). <strong>The</strong> barometers (RM Young 61202) and<br />

rainfall gauges (Casella 103800D) are deployed for the calibration of and/or making references to the wind<br />

speeds taken by the anemometers, in particular under the condition of extreme heavy rains.<br />

<strong>The</strong> functions of the software tools for wind and weather monitoring are : (i) to derive the relevant wind and<br />

weather monitoring parameters such as wind turbulence characteristics, the frequency response functions and<br />

the correlation plots of wind vs responses, and (ii) to output the measured/derived results in the standardized<br />

format of four –in-one format, i.e. 3 graphs and 1 table on one page. <strong>The</strong> 3 graphs are location plan of bridge<br />

site, location of sensors in bridge, graphical report of monitoring results, and a legend-table to monitoring results,<br />

as shown in Figures 32-39 and 43-45. <strong>The</strong> flow diagram of the software tools for wind and weather monitoring<br />

is shown in Figure 11. In Figure 11, the fundamental wind data analysis should be carried out first before the<br />

execution of other types of analysis. <strong>The</strong> details of this fundamental wind data analysis are tabulated in Table 5,<br />

as an example of fundamental wind data analysis for wind data collected from 3D ultrasonic type anemometers.<br />

B. Customized Software Tools for Temperature Monitoring [Ref. 15, 17 and 24]<br />

<strong>The</strong> temperature monitoring in Stonecutters Bridge is devised to monitor the temperature in five types of<br />

materials, i.e., structural steel sections (steel deck sections and steel tower skin sections), structural concrete<br />

sections (concrete deck sections and concrete tower sections), cable steel sections, air (un-shaded, shaded, and<br />

inside section) and asphalt pavement. Due to different installation requirements and measuring materials, the<br />

temperature sensors are classified as seven types, i.e. TMU-1, TMU-2, TMU-3, TMU-4, TMU-5, TMU-6 and<br />

TMU-7. TMU-1 and TMU-2 are both for structural steel temperature measurement, in which the former is bolt<br />

fixed type and the latter is bond mount type. TMU-3 and TMU-4 are both for structural concrete temperature<br />

measurement, in which the former is for tower and the latter is for deck. TMU-5 is for cable steel temperature<br />

measurement. TMU-6 is for air temperature and relative humidity (thermo transmitter type) measurement.<br />

TMU-7 is for asphalt pavement temperature measurement. All temperature sensors are Class A Platinum<br />

Resistance <strong>The</strong>rmometry except TMU-5 which is distributed optical fiber sensors (based on Raman scattering<br />

process).<br />

Two major parameters are required for temperature monitoring of structural steel sections and they are the<br />

effective temperature and the differential temperature. In order to derive these two parameters in the orthotropic<br />

steel deck section, the temperature sensors should be distributed along the top and bottom deck plate-trough<br />

sections and the web plates. <strong>The</strong> computational method for effective and differential temperatures basing on<br />

such arrangement of temperature sensors is shown in Figure 12. In a similar way, the effective temperature and<br />

differential temperatures in structural concrete sections are determined. Differential temperature in steel cable,<br />

tower skin and asphalt pavement is not required (as the respective diameter, thickness and depth are comparative<br />

small) and only the average (or effective) temperature is required. <strong>The</strong> effective temperature is normally used to<br />

estimate the thermal movement of the structural component and to calibrate/eliminate thermal effects for other<br />

aspects of monitoring such as stay forces monitoring. <strong>The</strong> flow diagram of the software tools for temperature<br />

monitoring is shown in Figure 13.<br />

C. Customized Software Tools for Seismic Monitoring [Ref. 10, 15 and 17]<br />

In an earthquake, no actual force is applied to the bridge. Instead, the ground moves back and forth (and/or up<br />

and down) and this movement induces inertial forces that then deform the bridge. It is the displacements in the<br />

bridge, relative to the moving base, that impose deformations on the bridge. Through the elastic properties, these<br />

deformations cause elastic forces to develop in the individual members and connections. Earthquake ground<br />

motions usually are imposed through the use of the ground acceleration records. In Stonecutters Bridge, if an<br />

earthquake with a Modified Mercalli Scale of 5 or more is occurred, the time-series acceleration data at<br />

tower-base will be used to generate the response spectrum of the bridge at a certain level of damping (which is<br />

5% according to Design Memorandum of Stonecutters Bridge). <strong>The</strong> spectrum is obtained by repeated solving<br />

the dynamic equilibrium equations (expressed in terms of bridge’s circular frequency) by Newmark’s method<br />

with the input of the recorded time-series acceleration data (in a time increment of 0.02 seconds) for the bridge<br />

with various circular frequencies and then plotting the peak displacement obtained for that circular frequency (ω)<br />

versus the frequency for which the displacement was obtained. <strong>The</strong> velocity (or pseudo-velocity) response<br />

-248-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!