28.05.2014 Views

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

displacement influence lines and stress influence line. <strong>The</strong> measured displacement range at GPS instrument<br />

point: GP04 is 115 mm (or 1.4 mm per ton), and the corresponding measured stress range at strain instrument<br />

point: SW60X is 16 MPa (or 0.195 MPa per ton).<br />

3.4.4 Global Dynamic Features Monitoring (Figures 38-39)<br />

Four hours of time-series acceleration data obtained from the two nos. of accelerometers installed inside the<br />

steel deck-section at mid main span are used. <strong>The</strong> time duration for one data frame used is 30 minutes and the<br />

total number of data points per data frame is 180,000 which are computed on a sampling rate of 100 Hz. <strong>The</strong><br />

frequency resolution for extraction is therefore 0.000556 Hz. <strong>The</strong> total number of data frames considered in<br />

average is fifteen and the corresponding wind speed and air temperature references are respective 2.05 m/s<br />

(10-miniute mean) and 16.4~17.5°C. <strong>The</strong> result of vertical flexural deck frequencies (the first 20 nos.) extracted<br />

from the power spectrum is shown in Figures 38. Of these 20 measured frequencies, 16 of them are<br />

corresponding to the analyzed results. <strong>The</strong> comparison between the measured results and analyzed results (by<br />

normal mode analysis of a 3D space frame finite element model – built and analyzed by ANSYS/Multiphysics<br />

[Ref. 38]) is shown in Figure 39. <strong>The</strong> comparison shows good correlation between measured and analyzed<br />

results, and the model is reliable and accuracy for the analysis of highway load-effects.<br />

3.4.5 Stay Forces Monitoring (Figures 40-41)<br />

<strong>The</strong> example of stay forces monitoring is refers to the ambient vibration works which was requested by the<br />

Engineer for checking the as-built stay forces with their computed stay forces under their reference (completion)<br />

conditions [Ref. 36]. A total of 224 stay cables were measured in the seven nights during the period of 4-12<br />

November 2009. Figure 40 illustrates the installation of accelerometer on stay cable and corresponding<br />

procedures of data processing and analysis. Figure 41 illustrates the results of stay forces in the main span of<br />

East Tower – North side obtained from the Engineer, the Contractor and Highways Department.<br />

3.4.6 Displacements Monitoring (Figures 42-43)<br />

<strong>The</strong> displacements monitoring refers to the input of the GPS data into the pre-built finite element bridge model<br />

and re-generate the deflected bridge geometry profile/profiles and stress contours with stresses output at<br />

key/instrumented structural sections/locations. Figure 42 illustrates the derived displacement profile (with<br />

colour contours) of Stonecutters Bridge, and Figure 43 shows the corresponding derived stress in deck trough<br />

sections.<br />

3.4.7 Fatigue Damages Monitoring (Figures 44-45)<br />

<strong>The</strong> example of fatigue damages monitoring is based on the results of dynamic strain gauges installed in the<br />

deck trough section at bottom of north longitudinal box at mid main span. Figure 44 shows the stress demand<br />

ratio plot, which is used to detect whether the measured stress range at deck trough section exceeding the<br />

maximum allowable stress range of 35 MPa (Class F2). If the measured stress range exceeds the maximum<br />

allowable limit, then micro-cracks might be occurred and the Palmgren-Miner rule cannot be applied in fatigue<br />

assessment. As Figure 44 shows that the maximum measured stress range at the deck trough section considered<br />

is 9.99 MPa, which is much less than the allowable stress range of 35 MPa (F2 Class), fatigue assessment can<br />

therefore be proceeded. Figure 45 illustrates the fatigue damage assessment result. <strong>The</strong> estimate fatigue life at<br />

the fatigue assessment point considered is 713 years, which is greater than the design fatigue life of 200~500<br />

years.<br />

3.4.8 Permanent Loads Monitoring (Figures 46-47)<br />

<strong>The</strong> results of permanent loads monitoring at Stonecutters tower-base is shown in Figures 46 and 47. <strong>The</strong> total<br />

measured compressive strains in Locations A and B of Figure 46 are 626 με and 651 με respectively at a<br />

reference concrete temperature of 20°C. <strong>The</strong> strain analysis shows that the percentages of structural strain, creep<br />

strain and shrinkage strain are respective 44%, 20% and 36% (upon the bridge opening to public traffics). <strong>The</strong><br />

strain due to permanent loads is around 44% of the total measured compressive strains or 281 με (=44%<br />

x(626+651)/2). This strain corresponds to 8.486 MPa ≈ 8.392 MPa which is estimated basing on self-weight of<br />

concrete (71250 tons), stainless steel (1400 tons), steel reinforcement (5500 tons), self-weight of steel deck and<br />

stay cables (20100 tons per tower), pavement (2126 tons), street furniture (277 tons) and a tower-area of 119.94<br />

m 2 at 5.8 mPD or the strain instrument level.<br />

-255-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!