28.05.2014 Views

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMS<br />

Materials and Mix Proportion<br />

<strong>The</strong> cementitious materials used in this study were ASTM Type III Portland cement and class C fly ash. <strong>The</strong><br />

coarse aggregate had a maximum size of 12.7 mm and consisted of solid crushed limestone from a local source,<br />

with a density of about 2.70 g/cm 3 . <strong>The</strong> fine aggregate was #16 flint silica sand (ASTM 50-70).<br />

polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer (SP) was used to achieve desired workability. In addition to the SP, a<br />

viscosity modifying admixture (VMA) was also used to enhance the viscosity and avoid fiber segregation. This<br />

mixture has 1.5% volume fraction of hooked steel fiber with circular cross-section was used with tensile<br />

strength of 2300MPa and aspect ratio of 79 (diameter= 0.38mm and length= 30mm). Average 28-day<br />

compressive strength based on 100×200 mm cylinders is approximately 40 MPa. Details of matrix composition<br />

are given in Tables 1.<br />

Cement<br />

Table 1 Relative composition of SCHPFRC mixture by weight and compressive strength<br />

Fly<br />

Ash<br />

Sand<br />

Coarse<br />

Aggregate<br />

Superplasticizer<br />

f ¢<br />

Water VMA Steel Fiber c<br />

(MPa)<br />

1.0 0.875 2.2 1.2 0.005 0.8 0.038 0.315 40<br />

Specimen Geometry and Test Setup<br />

A 890×890×70 mm concrete panel was fabricated for the shear panel test. Figure 2 illustrates the geometry and<br />

reinforcement layout of the panel. In order to provide an adequate post-cracking resistance of the panel, forty D6<br />

deformed wires were provided for the x-direction reinforcement, giving a total reinforcement area of 1543 mm²,<br />

which equated to a reinforcement ratio of 2.47%.<br />

5/16" Threaded Rod<br />

D6 Bars<br />

ρ x= 2.47%<br />

Pure Shear<br />

Pure Shear<br />

70<br />

70<br />

εy<br />

εh<br />

εv<br />

εx<br />

890<br />

890<br />

Pure Shear<br />

Pure Shear<br />

Y<br />

X<br />

Unit: mm<br />

Figure 2 Dimension, reinforcement layout and LVDT setup of panel<br />

This in-plane pure shear panel test was conducted by using the Panel Tester Machine developed by Vecchio<br />

(1979, 1982) at the <strong>University</strong> of Toronto. This machine and experimental setup were designed to apply various<br />

in-plane loading conditions to a concrete panel. <strong>The</strong> in-plane shear forces are generated by the horizontal and<br />

vertical jacks on each opposing side of the panel. <strong>The</strong>re are adjustable links on the frame to prevent out-of-plane<br />

displacement and keep the panel aligned. Deformations (strains) of the panel were obtained continuously from<br />

the LVDTs and strain gauges throughout the duration of each test. Additional data were also obtained from<br />

Zurich gauge readings that were taken at each load stage to verify the accuracy of LVDT. <strong>The</strong>se data were<br />

subsequently analysed to investigate the response characteristics of the concrete panels under in-plane pure<br />

shear loading.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS<br />

<strong>The</strong> shear stress-shear strain response of SCHPFRC panel is plotted in Figure 3. <strong>The</strong> behavior kept linear up to<br />

first cracking at the shear stress of 1.5 MPa. <strong>The</strong> panel failure occurred at a maximum shear stress of 4.3MPa<br />

-496-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!