28.05.2014 Views

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In order to check the loss assessment results, a series of dynamic time-history analysis are carried out by a<br />

nonlinear fiber program “SeismoStruct”. Four 2D reinforced concrete frames with two bays are built in fiber<br />

element, 5-storey (H T =15m, T y =1.5s), 8-storey (H T =24m, T y =2.4s), 10-storey (H T =30m, T y =3.0s) and 12-storey<br />

(H T =36m, T y =3.6s) respectively. Geometry parameters of the model frames are used the same with that in Table<br />

1. Since fiber elements model only flexural response. Shear strength and shear deformation are generally not<br />

modeled. Column-beam joints and foundation joints are modeled by elastic non-fiber spring elements in order to<br />

take the joint rotation and shear deformation into account. <strong>The</strong> analysis outcomes are shown in Figure 6 and the<br />

maximum equivalent displacement is calculated as Equation (16)<br />

Δ<br />

eq<br />

=<br />

n<br />

∑<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

2<br />

i i<br />

m Δ<br />

n<br />

∑<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

m Δ<br />

where m i is the mass at the height H i associated with maximum displacement Δ i during the time-history analysis.<br />

i<br />

i<br />

(16)<br />

Displacement (cm)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

PGA=0.25g<br />

Ta=0.15s<br />

Tb=0.5s<br />

Tc=2.5s<br />

T=3.13s<br />

H=31.3m<br />

Capacity Displacement<br />

5 T=0.91s<br />

H=9.1m Demand Displacement<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Period (seconds)<br />

Figure 5 Beam-sway RC frame yield capacity and demand curves<br />

Displacement (m)<br />

0.27<br />

max disp. of a single wave<br />

0.24<br />

Average Displacement<br />

0.21<br />

Demand Displacement<br />

0.18<br />

Capacity displacement<br />

0.15<br />

0.12<br />

0.09<br />

0.06<br />

0.03<br />

5-storey RC frame<br />

PGA=0.25g<br />

0.00<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20<br />

Serial number of artificially wave<br />

Displacement (m)<br />

0.27 8-storey RC frame<br />

0.24<br />

PGA=0.25g<br />

0.21<br />

0.18<br />

0.15<br />

0.12<br />

Max disp. of a single wave<br />

0.09<br />

Average Displacement<br />

0.06<br />

Demand Displacement<br />

0.03<br />

Capacity Displacement<br />

0.00<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20<br />

Serial number of artificially waves<br />

Displacement (m)<br />

0.27<br />

10-storey RC frame<br />

0.24<br />

PGA=0.25g<br />

0.21<br />

0.18<br />

0.15<br />

0.12<br />

Max disp. of a single wave<br />

0.09<br />

Average displacement<br />

0.06<br />

Demand displacement<br />

0.03<br />

Capacity displacement<br />

0.00<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20<br />

Serial number of artificially waves<br />

Displacement (m)<br />

0.27<br />

0.24<br />

0.21<br />

0.18<br />

0.15<br />

12-storey RC frame<br />

PGA=0.25g<br />

0.12<br />

Max disp. of a single wave<br />

0.09<br />

Average displacement<br />

0.06<br />

Demand displacement<br />

0.03<br />

Capacity displacement<br />

0.00<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20<br />

Serial number of artificially waves<br />

Figure 6 Maximum equivalent displacement of time-history analysis<br />

According to the result of the DBELA, the 5-storey and 8-storey reinforced concrete frames have been failed in<br />

the yield limit state, which agrees well with the result of dynamic time-history analysis. All the maximum<br />

-305-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!