28.05.2014 Views

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Boundary Simulation<br />

Three-dimensional shell elements S4R, were selected to simulate the whole beam, including beam web, flanges,<br />

and stiffeners and the clip angle connection was modeled by using brick element (C3D8R in ABAQUS). As<br />

lateral bracings were provided in the test, lateral displacement (U 3 =0) was prevented in the finite element<br />

models at the positions of bracing as shown in Figure 2. Suitable boundary conditions were provided to the<br />

finite element models to simulate the simply supported condition and point load was applied to simulate the<br />

loading condition. Bilinear spring elements were used to simulate the bolts between the connection of beam and<br />

the flange of supporting column. <strong>The</strong> tensile and compressive stiffness of the spring was set as 200 N/mm at<br />

first 0.5 mm in order to account for the slip behaviour. Afterwards, the stiffness was changed to a relative large<br />

value of 40000 N/mm per spring. Those spring properties were obtained by comparing the load versus<br />

deflection curve of the numerical results and test results. In addition, at the edge of bolt hole, freedom of the<br />

outer surface nodes was constrained to be zero on vertical and out of plane direction (U 2 =0,U 3 =0). To simulate<br />

the welding near the clip angles and beam web, multi-point constraints (MPCs) were introduced. It allows<br />

constraints to be imposed between different degrees of freedom of the model. MPC type BEAM provides a rigid<br />

beam between two nodes to constrain the displacement and rotation at the first node to the displacement and<br />

rotation at the second node. Two series of MPC BEAM were used in the models to link the corresponding nodes.<br />

For the nodes associated as Group 1, it is needed to constrain all nodes at the clip angle edge to beam web<br />

directly at the weld root. In order to account for the weld size, the nodes associated as Group 2 paralleled to the<br />

angle edge was linked from a distance of angle thickness to the beam web at the weld leg to be consistent with<br />

the measured weld sizes. Typical finite element mesh and boundary conditions were shown in Figure 2.<br />

Nodes directly connected<br />

to beam web (Group 1)<br />

Using MPC element to<br />

connect to the beam web<br />

(Group 2)<br />

Material Property<br />

Figure 2 Typical finite element mesh and boundary conditions<br />

<strong>The</strong> isotropic elastic-plastic material properties with the von Mises yield criterion were used for the FE analyses<br />

to account for the effect of the material nonlinearities. As the input values of ABAQUS, the stress and strain are<br />

p<br />

required as true stress ( σ ) and true plastic stain (<br />

true<br />

ε ). <strong>The</strong>refore, the nominal stress (<br />

true<br />

σ ) and nominal<br />

nom<br />

strain ( ε ) getting from the tension coupons tests of Zhong et al. (2004), were converted to true stress (<br />

nom<br />

σ )<br />

true<br />

p<br />

and true plastic stain ( ε<br />

true<br />

), using Eqs. (4) and (5). It is emphasized that, the nominal stress ( σ ) and nominal<br />

nom<br />

strain ( ε nom<br />

) were taken from the static stress-strain curves from the coupon tests.<br />

σ<br />

true<br />

= σ<br />

nom( 1+<br />

ε<br />

nom)<br />

(4)<br />

p<br />

⎛ σ<br />

true ⎞<br />

ε<br />

true<br />

= ln( 1+<br />

ε<br />

nom<br />

) − ⎜ ⎟<br />

(5)<br />

⎝ E ⎠<br />

-466-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!