28.05.2014 Views

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 2 is a photograph of the interior layout of the PFD. <strong>The</strong> photograph shows that a piezoelectric actuator<br />

embedded in the PFD provides a controllable normal force (or called clamping force) between the friction pads<br />

and friction bar, so the friction force provided by the PFD can be regulated by a control law. When the<br />

SAF-TMD is excited during an earthquake, the friction force produced by the relative motion between the<br />

friction pad of the PFD and the friction bar will provide energy dissipation capability for the SAF-TMD, and as<br />

a result the response of primary structure and the TMD stroke can be attenuated.<br />

Control of PFD<br />

Figure 2 is a control block diagram of the PFD. <strong>The</strong> figure shows that a voltage amplifier and a controller are<br />

usually needed to control the PFD. <strong>The</strong> controller can be a simple digital controller consisting of a<br />

micro-computer (or a PC) and an analog/digital (A/D) converter card. <strong>The</strong> micro-computer calculates the control<br />

command based on the sensor measurement of the current system response whereas the A/D card converts the<br />

computed digital command to an analog signal, which is usually a DC voltage below 10V. However, the<br />

piezoelectric actuator may require a driving DC voltage up to 1000V or higher; therefore, the control voltage<br />

provided by the controller is not sufficient to drive the piezoelectric actuator directly. <strong>The</strong>refore, a voltage<br />

amplifier is needed to obtain a control voltage sufficient for controlling the piezoelectric actuator. <strong>The</strong><br />

experiment in this study used an amplifier with a gain of 100V/V to amplify a 10V control signal to a driving<br />

voltage of 1000V. On the other hand, the electric current required for the piezoelectric actuator is usually at a<br />

range of several mA, so the control energy demand for the PFD is minimal.<br />

As mentioned above, the friction force of the PFD is controlled by regulating the normal force produced by a<br />

piezoelectric actuator. <strong>The</strong> normal force, which is applied to the friction interface of the PFD, can be expressed<br />

by the following equation<br />

N( t)<br />

= N0 + C V ( t)<br />

(1)<br />

z<br />

where N(t) is total normal force, N 0 is pre-compression force (which produced by adjusting the pre-compression<br />

screw shown in Figure 2), V(t) is driving voltage for the piezoelectric actuator, and C z , which is the key<br />

parameter, is the piezoelectric coefficient of the piezoelectric actuator. Equation (1) shows that the force increase<br />

is proportional to the piezoelectric coefficient C z . In terms of physical properties, C z is the trusting force of the<br />

actuator generated by a unit driving voltage; therefore, C z provides a measure of the efficiency of the<br />

piezoelectric actuator. A larger C z implies that a higher thrusting force can be generated by the actuator with a<br />

given voltage. Since the piezoelectric actuator induced by the input voltage is elongated by only several tens μm<br />

(10 -6 meters), the value of C z is highly dependent on the confinement boundary condition of the actuator. In this<br />

study, a test was conducted to identify the actual value of the coefficient C z for the SAF-TMD.<br />

According to the Coulomb friction law, the maximum friction force u d,max (t), i.e., slip force, of the PFD should<br />

correlate with normal force N(t). By using Eq. (1), this slip force can be written as<br />

u<br />

t)<br />

= μ N ( t)<br />

= μ ( N C V ( ))<br />

(2)<br />

d , max ( d<br />

d 0 + z t<br />

where μ d denotes the friction coefficient of the PFD. Note that u d,max (t) in Eq. (2) represents the absolute value of<br />

the maximum friction. Equations (1) and (2) show that, by controlling the driving voltage V(t), the normal force<br />

N(t) as well as the slip force u d,max (t) of the PFD can be altered in a desired manner.<br />

Non-sticking friction control<br />

As noted above, an SAF-TMD generally requires an on-line control algorithm to determine the driving voltage<br />

V(t) of the piezoelectric actuator. This section explains the control law and its important role in the performance<br />

of the SAF-TMD system, and this section will explain the control law employed in this study. This control law<br />

is developed based on the non-sticking friction (NSF) controller (He et al. 2003; Ng and Xu 2007). In order to<br />

suit the control of the SAF-TMD system, whose control command is the driving voltage V(t), the NSF control<br />

method is expressed as<br />

V ( t)<br />

= Vmax tanh( β v&<br />

( t) )<br />

(3)<br />

s<br />

where β is a control parameter set by the control designer. A larger value of β leads to the voltage ratio<br />

increasing more rapidly from 0.0 to 1.0 as the sliding velocity v& s<br />

(t)<br />

increases. By employing the smooth<br />

function tanh(x), Eq. (3) is able to prevent the abrupt change of the normal force N(t), as seen in Eq. (1). A larger<br />

β leads to a function value increasing rapidly to 1.0. <strong>The</strong>refore, clamping force V(t) increases rapidly as β<br />

increases. Equation (3) was used as the control law in the shaking table test to compute the on-line command of<br />

V(t). This control law is very easily implemented since it only requires measurement of sliding velocity v&<br />

s<br />

(t)<br />

for the SAF-TMD. Finally, substituting V(t) from Eq. (3) in (1) gives the following normal force function:<br />

-409-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!