28.05.2014 Views

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

phenomenon, however, cannot be considered in Der Kiureghian’s model. It does not explicitly model the<br />

influences of the sites effects on ground motion spatial variations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ground motion power spectral density functions and spatial variation models can be used directly as inputs<br />

at multiple supports of structures in spectral analysis of structural responses. This approach, however, is usually<br />

applied to relatively simple structural models and for linear response of the structures owing to its complexity.<br />

For complex structural systems and for nonlinear seismic response analysis, only the deterministic solution can<br />

be evaluated with sufficient accuracy. In this case, the generation of artificial seismic ground motions is required.<br />

Many methods are available to generate artificial spatially correlated time histories at different structural<br />

supports. Hao et al. (1989) presented a method of generating spatially varying time histories at different<br />

locations on ground surface based on the assumption that all the spatially varying ground motions have the same<br />

intensity, i.e., the same power spectral density or response spectrum. <strong>The</strong> variation of the spatial ground motions<br />

is modelled by an empirical coherency loss function and a phase delay depending on a constant apparent wave<br />

propagation velocity. If the considered site is flat with uniform soil properties, the uniform ground motion<br />

intensity assumption for spatial ground motions in the site is reasonable. However, for a canyon site or a site<br />

with varying soil properties, because local site conditions affect the wave propagation hence the ground motion<br />

intensity and frequency contents as discussed above, the uniform ground motion power spectral density<br />

assumption is no longer valid. Deodatis (1996) developed a method to simulate spatial ground motions with<br />

different power spectral densities at different locations. <strong>The</strong> method is based on a spectral representation<br />

algorithm (Shinozuka 1972; Shinozuka and Jan 1972) to generate sample functions of a non-stationary,<br />

multivariate stochastic process with evolutionary power spectrum. Similar to the Der Kiureghian (1996) model,<br />

the considered varying spectral densities are filtered white noise functions with different central frequency and<br />

damping ratio. This method thus can only approximately represent local site effects on ground motions.<br />

Moreover, trying to establish an analytical expression for a realistic ground motion evolutionary power spectrum<br />

related to the local site conditions is quite difficult since very limited information is available on the spectral<br />

characteristics of propagating seismic waves (Shinozuka and Deodatis 1988).<br />

<strong>The</strong> first part of this paper extends the work by Der Kiureghian (1996) by using the 1D wave propagation theory<br />

(Wolf 1985) to more realistically model the influence of local site conditions on seismic waves. <strong>The</strong> spectral<br />

representation method (Shinozuka 1972; Shinozuka and Jan 1972) and 1D wave propagation theory are<br />

combined to derive the power spectral density functions of the spatially varying ground motions on surface of a<br />

canyon site with multiple soil layers. <strong>The</strong> ground motion spatial variations are modelled in two steps: firstly, the<br />

spatially varying base rock ground motions are assumed to consist of out-of-plane SH wave or in-plane<br />

combined P and SV waves and propagate into the layered soil site with an assumed incident angle. <strong>The</strong> spatial<br />

base rock motions are assumed to have the same intensity and frequency contents and are modelled by the<br />

filtered Tajimi-Kanai power spectral density function (Tajimi 1960). <strong>The</strong> spatial variation effect is modelled by a<br />

theoretical coherency loss function (Sobczky 1991). <strong>The</strong> surface motions of a canyon site with multiple soil<br />

layers are derived based on the deterministic 1D wave propagation theory. <strong>The</strong> auto power spectral density<br />

functions of ground motions at various points on ground surface and the cross power spectral density functions<br />

between ground motions at any two points are derived by neglecting the wave scattering on the uneven canyon<br />

surface. <strong>The</strong> spectral representation method is then used to generate spatially varying ground motion time<br />

histories. Compared to the work by Deodatis (1996), in this study the power spectral density functions at<br />

different locations of a canyon site are derived based on the 1D wave propagation theory, which directly relates<br />

the local soil conditions and base rock motion characteristics with the surface ground motions, thus local site<br />

effect can be realistically considered. <strong>The</strong> current approach also allows for a consideration of different incoming<br />

wave types and incident angles to the soil site, which have great influence on the surface motions. <strong>The</strong> proposed<br />

approach can be used to simulate ground motion time histories at an uneven site with known non-uniform site<br />

conditions.<br />

For bridge structures with conventional expansion joints, a complete avoidance of pounding between bridge<br />

decks during strong earthquakes is often impossible since the separation gap of an expansion joint is usually a<br />

few centimetres to ensure a smooth traffic flow. <strong>The</strong>refore, pounding damages of adjacent bridge structures have<br />

always been observed in almost all the previous major earthquakes. Pounding is an extremely complex<br />

phenomenon involving damage due to plastic deformation, local cracking or crushing, fracturing due to impact,<br />

and friction when two adjacent bridge decks are in contact with each other. To simplify the analysis, many<br />

researchers modelled a bridge girder as a lumped mass (e.g. Malhotra 1998; Jankowski et al. 1998;<br />

Ruangrassamee and Kawashima 2001; DesRoches and Muthukumar 2002; Chouw and Hao 2005, 2008) or<br />

beam-column element frame (e.g. Jankowski et al. 2000; Chouw et al. 2006). Based on theses simplified<br />

lumped mass model or beam-column element model, only 1D point to point pounding, usually in the axial<br />

direction of the structures, can be considered. In a real bridge structure under seismic loading, pounding could<br />

-157-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!