r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
r - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
phenomenon, however, cannot be considered in Der Kiureghian’s model. It does not explicitly model the<br />
influences of the sites effects on ground motion spatial variations.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ground motion power spectral density functions and spatial variation models can be used directly as inputs<br />
at multiple supports of structures in spectral analysis of structural responses. This approach, however, is usually<br />
applied to relatively simple structural models and for linear response of the structures owing to its complexity.<br />
For complex structural systems and for nonlinear seismic response analysis, only the deterministic solution can<br />
be evaluated with sufficient accuracy. In this case, the generation of artificial seismic ground motions is required.<br />
Many methods are available to generate artificial spatially correlated time histories at different structural<br />
supports. Hao et al. (1989) presented a method of generating spatially varying time histories at different<br />
locations on ground surface based on the assumption that all the spatially varying ground motions have the same<br />
intensity, i.e., the same power spectral density or response spectrum. <strong>The</strong> variation of the spatial ground motions<br />
is modelled by an empirical coherency loss function and a phase delay depending on a constant apparent wave<br />
propagation velocity. If the considered site is flat with uniform soil properties, the uniform ground motion<br />
intensity assumption for spatial ground motions in the site is reasonable. However, for a canyon site or a site<br />
with varying soil properties, because local site conditions affect the wave propagation hence the ground motion<br />
intensity and frequency contents as discussed above, the uniform ground motion power spectral density<br />
assumption is no longer valid. Deodatis (1996) developed a method to simulate spatial ground motions with<br />
different power spectral densities at different locations. <strong>The</strong> method is based on a spectral representation<br />
algorithm (Shinozuka 1972; Shinozuka and Jan 1972) to generate sample functions of a non-stationary,<br />
multivariate stochastic process with evolutionary power spectrum. Similar to the Der Kiureghian (1996) model,<br />
the considered varying spectral densities are filtered white noise functions with different central frequency and<br />
damping ratio. This method thus can only approximately represent local site effects on ground motions.<br />
Moreover, trying to establish an analytical expression for a realistic ground motion evolutionary power spectrum<br />
related to the local site conditions is quite difficult since very limited information is available on the spectral<br />
characteristics of propagating seismic waves (Shinozuka and Deodatis 1988).<br />
<strong>The</strong> first part of this paper extends the work by Der Kiureghian (1996) by using the 1D wave propagation theory<br />
(Wolf 1985) to more realistically model the influence of local site conditions on seismic waves. <strong>The</strong> spectral<br />
representation method (Shinozuka 1972; Shinozuka and Jan 1972) and 1D wave propagation theory are<br />
combined to derive the power spectral density functions of the spatially varying ground motions on surface of a<br />
canyon site with multiple soil layers. <strong>The</strong> ground motion spatial variations are modelled in two steps: firstly, the<br />
spatially varying base rock ground motions are assumed to consist of out-of-plane SH wave or in-plane<br />
combined P and SV waves and propagate into the layered soil site with an assumed incident angle. <strong>The</strong> spatial<br />
base rock motions are assumed to have the same intensity and frequency contents and are modelled by the<br />
filtered Tajimi-Kanai power spectral density function (Tajimi 1960). <strong>The</strong> spatial variation effect is modelled by a<br />
theoretical coherency loss function (Sobczky 1991). <strong>The</strong> surface motions of a canyon site with multiple soil<br />
layers are derived based on the deterministic 1D wave propagation theory. <strong>The</strong> auto power spectral density<br />
functions of ground motions at various points on ground surface and the cross power spectral density functions<br />
between ground motions at any two points are derived by neglecting the wave scattering on the uneven canyon<br />
surface. <strong>The</strong> spectral representation method is then used to generate spatially varying ground motion time<br />
histories. Compared to the work by Deodatis (1996), in this study the power spectral density functions at<br />
different locations of a canyon site are derived based on the 1D wave propagation theory, which directly relates<br />
the local soil conditions and base rock motion characteristics with the surface ground motions, thus local site<br />
effect can be realistically considered. <strong>The</strong> current approach also allows for a consideration of different incoming<br />
wave types and incident angles to the soil site, which have great influence on the surface motions. <strong>The</strong> proposed<br />
approach can be used to simulate ground motion time histories at an uneven site with known non-uniform site<br />
conditions.<br />
For bridge structures with conventional expansion joints, a complete avoidance of pounding between bridge<br />
decks during strong earthquakes is often impossible since the separation gap of an expansion joint is usually a<br />
few centimetres to ensure a smooth traffic flow. <strong>The</strong>refore, pounding damages of adjacent bridge structures have<br />
always been observed in almost all the previous major earthquakes. Pounding is an extremely complex<br />
phenomenon involving damage due to plastic deformation, local cracking or crushing, fracturing due to impact,<br />
and friction when two adjacent bridge decks are in contact with each other. To simplify the analysis, many<br />
researchers modelled a bridge girder as a lumped mass (e.g. Malhotra 1998; Jankowski et al. 1998;<br />
Ruangrassamee and Kawashima 2001; DesRoches and Muthukumar 2002; Chouw and Hao 2005, 2008) or<br />
beam-column element frame (e.g. Jankowski et al. 2000; Chouw et al. 2006). Based on theses simplified<br />
lumped mass model or beam-column element model, only 1D point to point pounding, usually in the axial<br />
direction of the structures, can be considered. In a real bridge structure under seismic loading, pounding could<br />
-157-