the new fuels with magnecular structure - Institute for Basic Research
the new fuels with magnecular structure - Institute for Basic Research
the new fuels with magnecular structure - Institute for Basic Research
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
96 RUGGERO MARIA SANTILLI<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> total energy output of <strong>the</strong> PlasmaArcFlow Reactors is given by<br />
E(mg) + E(heat) = 315 BTU/cf + 2, 254 BTU/cf = 2, 569 BTU/cf. (4.34)<br />
It <strong>the</strong>n follows that <strong>the</strong> energy efficiency of <strong>the</strong> PlasmaArcFlow reactors is underunity<br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of maximal possible efficiency,<br />
=<br />
Energy efficiency predicted by quantum chemistry =<br />
Total energy out<br />
Electric energy in = E mg + E heat<br />
E electr<br />
=<br />
2, 569 BTU/cf<br />
= 0.79. (4.35)<br />
3, 238 BTU/cf<br />
It is possible to show that, <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of 50% efficiency (i.e., when 50% of<br />
<strong>the</strong> original H and O recombine into water) <strong>the</strong> total energy output evidently<br />
decreases. For detail, we refer <strong>the</strong> interested reader to Aringazin and Santilli [9].<br />
4.8 Cleaning Fossil Fuel Exhaust <strong>with</strong> Magnegas<br />
Additive<br />
Electric power plants continue to attempt <strong>the</strong> cleaning of <strong>the</strong>ir atmospheric<br />
pollution (see Figure 1) via <strong>the</strong> cleaning of <strong>the</strong>ir exhaust. Since <strong>the</strong> related<br />
equipment is very expensive and notoriously inefficient, <strong>the</strong>se are attempts literally<br />
belonging to <strong>the</strong> past millennium. Nowadays, <strong>the</strong> exhaust of fossil fueled<br />
electric power plants can be cleaned via cost competitive improvement of <strong>the</strong><br />
combustion.<br />
It is known that, whe<strong>the</strong>r burning petroleum or coal, about 60% of <strong>the</strong> energy<br />
in <strong>the</strong> original fuel is literally thrown through <strong>the</strong> fluke, and so is <strong>the</strong> relates cost,<br />
due to <strong>the</strong> notoriously poor combustion.<br />
It is also known in chemistry that hydrogen is <strong>the</strong> best additive to improve<br />
combustion, <strong>with</strong> consequential improvement of <strong>the</strong> environmental quality of <strong>the</strong><br />
exhaust. In fact, hydrogen has <strong>the</strong> biggest flame temperature and speed among<br />
all known <strong>fuels</strong>. Consequently, <strong>the</strong> injection of hydrogen as an additive in <strong>the</strong><br />
flame of fossil <strong>fuels</strong> burns <strong>the</strong> uncombusted component of <strong>the</strong> exhausts in a way<br />
proportional to <strong>the</strong> used percentage of hydrogen. A reason hydrogen as currently<br />
available has not (and cannot) be used as additive in fossil fueled electric power<br />
plants is its prohibitive cost (that in <strong>the</strong> U.S.A. is of <strong>the</strong> order of 50 times <strong>the</strong><br />
cost of natural gas per same energy content, as recalled in Section 1.3).<br />
Magnegas is <strong>the</strong> best additive <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> cleaning of fossil fuel exhaust known to<br />
<strong>the</strong> author 9 because:<br />
9 The documented indication of o<strong>the</strong>r additives comparable to magnegas would be sincerely appreciated.