06.01.2015 Views

the new fuels with magnecular structure - Institute for Basic Research

the new fuels with magnecular structure - Institute for Basic Research

the new fuels with magnecular structure - Institute for Basic Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE NEW FUELS WITH MAGNECULAR STRUCTURE 53<br />

The conditions <strong>for</strong> scientific measurements of liquid magnecules via LC-<br />

MS/UVD are more stringent than those <strong>for</strong> gases, because of <strong>the</strong> great increase,<br />

in general, of <strong>the</strong> atomic weight of liquid magnecules which are generally much<br />

larger than <strong>the</strong> IR of conventionally used feeding lines, as shown below.<br />

This implies <strong>the</strong> possible erroneous claim that magnecules do not exist because<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are not detected by <strong>the</strong> LC-MS, while in reality <strong>the</strong> magnecule to be detected<br />

could not enter at all into <strong>the</strong> instrument.<br />

3.4 Apparent Magnecular Structure of H 3 and O 3<br />

As it is well known, chemistry has identified in GC-MS tests clusters <strong>with</strong><br />

3 a.m.u., which can only be constituted of three H atoms, H 3 , while <strong>the</strong> familiar<br />

ozone O 3 has been known since quite some time. These <strong>structure</strong>s are generally<br />

assumed to be molecules, that is, to have a valence bond according to one<br />

nomenclature or ano<strong>the</strong>r, although this author is aware of no in depth <strong>the</strong>oretical<br />

or experimental identification of <strong>the</strong> attractive <strong>for</strong>ce necessary to bond <strong>the</strong> third<br />

atom to a conventional molecule.<br />

There are serious doubts as to whe<strong>the</strong>r such a conventional molecular interpretation<br />

will resist <strong>the</strong> test of time as well as of scientific evidence. To begin,<br />

a fundamental property of valence bonds is that valence electrons correlate in<br />

pairs. Since <strong>the</strong> H 3 and O 3 <strong>structure</strong>s contain <strong>the</strong> molecules H 2 and O 2 in which<br />

all available valence electrons are already bonded in pairs, <strong>the</strong> belief that an additional<br />

third valence electron could be correlated to <strong>the</strong> preceding ones violates<br />

basic chemical knowledge on valence.<br />

Moreover, we have stressed earlier that <strong>the</strong> assumption of a third valence electron<br />

bonded to a valence pair is in violation of basic physical knowledge, because<br />

it would require <strong>the</strong> bond of a Fermion (<strong>the</strong> third electron <strong>with</strong> spin 1/2) <strong>with</strong><br />

a Boson (<strong>the</strong> singlet valence pair <strong>with</strong> spin 0) both possessing <strong>the</strong> same negative<br />

charge. Such a hypo<strong>the</strong>tical bond under molecular conditions would violate various<br />

laws in particle physics, e.g., it would imply a necessary violation of Pauli-s<br />

exclusion principle since <strong>the</strong> assumed “triplet” of electrons would have two identical<br />

electrons in <strong>the</strong> same <strong>structure</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> same energy.<br />

In view of <strong>the</strong> above (as well as o<strong>the</strong>r) inconsistencies, we here assume that<br />

<strong>the</strong> familiar H 3 and O 3 clusters are magnecules consisting of a third H and O<br />

atom magnetically bonded to <strong>the</strong> conventional H 2 and O 2 molecules, respectively,<br />

along <strong>the</strong> <strong>structure</strong> of Fig. 11.C. Note that this assumption is fully in line <strong>with</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!