the new fuels with magnecular structure - Institute for Basic Research

72 RUGGERO MARIA SANTILLI
macroscopic percentage all the way to 1, 000 a.m.u., which peaks remain individually
unidentified by the MS computer after scanning all known molecules.
By comparison, quantum chemistry predicts that the heaviest molecule in a
light gas such as magnegas should only have 44 a.m.u., while offering no explanation
whatever, not even remote or indirect on the existence of detectable teaks
all the way to 1, 000 a.m.u.
The above differences are so drastic to provide clear experimental evidence on
the fact that the magnegas structure is characterized by a new chemical species
not predicted or considered by quantum chemistry until now.
Besides the inability to identify the clusters composing magnegas via the computer
search among all known molecules, the chemical structure of magnegas
is equally unidentifiable via InfraRed Detectors (IRD), because the new peaks
composing magnegas have no IR signature at all, thus establishing the presence
of bonds of non-valence type (because these large clusters cannot possibly be all
symmetric).
Moreover, the IR signature of conventional molecules such as CO results in
being mutated (in the language of hadronic mechanics) with the appearance of
new peaks, which evidently indicate new internal bonds in conventional molecules.
In addition to all the above, dramatic differences between the prediction of
quantum chemistry and reality exist for the energy content of magnegas. For
instance, when produced with PlasmaArcFlow Reactors operating an electric arc
between at least one consumable electrode within pure water, quantum chemistry
predicts that magnegas should be a mixture of 50% H 2 and 50% CO, with traces
of O 2 and CO 2 .
This prediction is dramatically disproved by the fact that both the CO and
the CO 2 peaks do not appear in the MS scan in the predicted percentages, while
they appear in the IR scan although in a mutated form.
Moreover, quantum chemistry predicts that the indicated composition consisting
of 50% H 2 and 50% CO should have an energy content of about 315 BTU/cf,
namely, an energy content insufficient to cut metal. This prediction is also disproved
by the experimental evidence that magnegas cuts metal at least 50% faster
than acetylene (which has 2,300 BTU/cf).
Such a performance in metal cutting is more indicative of a plasma cutting
feature, such as the metal cutting via a plasma of ionized hydrogen atoms which
recombine into H 2 when cooling in the metal surface, thus releasing the energy
needed for metal cutting. The problem is that magnegas is at room temperature