06.01.2015 Views

the new fuels with magnecular structure - Institute for Basic Research

the new fuels with magnecular structure - Institute for Basic Research

the new fuels with magnecular structure - Institute for Basic Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE NEW FUELS WITH MAGNECULAR STRUCTURE 47<br />

work equally well <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> detection of magnecules, resulting in an analysis <strong>with</strong>out<br />

any real scientific value because:<br />

i) <strong>the</strong> species to be detected may not even have entered <strong>the</strong> instrument, as it<br />

is routinely <strong>the</strong> case <strong>for</strong> small syringes and feeding lines particularly <strong>for</strong> liquid<br />

magnecules (which can be so big as to be visible to <strong>the</strong> naked eye, as shown later<br />

on in this book);<br />

ii) <strong>the</strong> species to be detected may have been destroyed by <strong>the</strong> measurement<br />

itself, as it is routinely <strong>the</strong> case <strong>for</strong> instruments operated at very high temperature,<br />

or flame ionization instruments which, when used <strong>for</strong> combustible gases <strong>with</strong><br />

<strong>magnecular</strong> <strong>structure</strong>, cause <strong>the</strong> combustion of magnecules at <strong>the</strong> very time of<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir detection; or<br />

iii) <strong>the</strong> detection itself may create magnecules which do not exist in <strong>the</strong> original<br />

species, as it is <strong>the</strong> case of peaks <strong>with</strong> 3 a.m.u. discussed in Fig. 11.<br />

In conclusion, <strong>the</strong> separation between a true scientific measurement and a<br />

personal experimental belief requires extreme scientific caution in <strong>the</strong> selection<br />

of <strong>the</strong> analytic instrument, its use, and <strong>the</strong> interpretation of <strong>the</strong> results.<br />

3.2 Unambiguous Detection of Molecules<br />

As it is well known, a gas molecule is identifiable by unique and unambiguous<br />

GC-MS peaks, which are distinctly different from those of any o<strong>the</strong>r gas molecule.<br />

In addition, this GC-MS identification can be confirmed by IRD peaks and related<br />

resonating frequencies, which are also distinctly different <strong>for</strong> different gas<br />

molecule. Additional confirmations are possible using o<strong>the</strong>r analytic methods,<br />

such as those based on average molecular weight, chemical reactions and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

procedures.<br />

The advent of <strong>the</strong> <strong>new</strong> chemical species of magnecules suggests a re-examination<br />

of <strong>the</strong>se analytic methods and procedures so as to separate personal opinions from<br />

actual scientific identifications. Such a re-examination is warranted by <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

that, due to extended use, claims of specific molecular identifications are nowadays<br />

generally voiced via <strong>the</strong> use of only one analytic detector.<br />

As an illustration, most contemporary analytic laboratories conduct chemical<br />

analyses on gases via <strong>the</strong> sole use of <strong>the</strong> IRD. However, infrared detectors do<br />

not identify complete molecules, since <strong>the</strong>y can only identify <strong>the</strong> bond in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

dimers. For instance, <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of H 2 O, <strong>the</strong> IRD does not identify <strong>the</strong> complete<br />

molecule, but only its dimer H–O.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!