the new fuels with magnecular structure - Institute for Basic Research

THE NEW FUELS WITH MAGNECULAR STRUCTURE 103
detection of peaks all the way to 1,000 a.m.u. in a gas solely composed of H, C and
O atoms that are combined at the 10, 000 ◦ F of the electric arc, thus excluding
hydrocarbons and other standard molecules. Even more forceful experimental
evidence on new non-valence bonds will be presented in the next sections.
It is easy to predict that the emergence of “new” non-valence bonds, we have
called magnecular, will inevitably imply a revision of a number of current views
in chemistry, the first case coming to mind being that of the so-called H-bridges
in the liquid state of water.
As recalled in Chapter 9 [26], this author never accepted quantum chemistry
as “the final theory” for molecular structure because quantum chemistry lacks
the explicit and numerical identification of the attractive force in valence bonds,
besides the fact that, according to quantum mechanics, two identical electrons
should repel, rather than attract each other, as a consequence of which the name
“valence” is a mere nomenclature without sufficient scientific content.
This was essentially the situation in molecular structures such as the water
molecule H 2 O. Hadronic mechanics and chemistry have resolved this insufficiency
by identifying explicitly and numerically the ATTRACTIVE force between
IDENTICAL ELECTRONS that is responsible for the water and other molecules.
In this section we have learned that molecules admit non-valence bonds originating
from toroidal polarizations of the orbitals. The magnecular origin of the
H-bridges in the liquid state of water is then inevitable because, as recalled in
Chapter 9 [26], the orbitals of the H atoms in H 2 O do not have a spherical distribution,
but a distribution that is perpendicular to the H−O−H plane, thus being
precisely of the toroidal type underlying magnecules (see Fig. 34 for details).
In closing the author would like to stress that the above findings, even though
independently confirmed numerous times, should be considered preliminary and
in need of additional independent verifications, which are here solicited under the
suggestion that:
1) Only peaks in macroscopic percentages should be initially considered to
avoid shifting issues of primary relevance into others of comparatively marginal
importance at this time;
2) The internal attractive force necessary for the very existence of cluster is
identified in clear numerical terms without vague nomenclatures deprived of an
actual physical reality, or prohibited by physical laws; and
3) The adopted terminology is identified with care. The word “magnecule”
is a mere name intended to denote a chemical species possessing the specifically