08.02.2015 Views

Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI

Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI

Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

80 Revised Frameworks: <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>9001</strong>:<strong>2000</strong> <strong>and</strong> the <strong>CMMI</strong> ®<br />

4.2.1 New to <strong>CMMI</strong> ® version 1.1<br />

The <strong>CMMI</strong> ® was developed based on the following models:<br />

• CMM ® v2.0 (draft C) for software;<br />

• EIA Interim St<strong>and</strong>ard 731, System Engineering Capability Model<br />

(SECM);<br />

• Integrated Product Development Model, draft v0.98a (IPD-CMM ® );<br />

• Software Acquisition CMM ® , v.1.02 (SA-CMM ® ).<br />

Although the CMM ® v1.1 is not officially listed as a <strong>CMMI</strong> ® predecessor<br />

model, for software organizations, the transition to <strong>CMMI</strong> ® will be from<br />

CMM ® v1.1, rather than from the unpublished CMM ® v2.0c.<br />

The <strong>CMMI</strong> ® uses a systems approach to product development <strong>and</strong> emphasizes<br />

<strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> for products (or services). The <strong>CMMI</strong> ® has two<br />

representations: staged <strong>and</strong> continuous, <strong>and</strong> several bodies of knowledge or<br />

disciplines: systems engineering, software engineering, <strong>and</strong> integrated product<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>process</strong> development (IPPD). 2 Although one can select either the software<br />

or systems engineering discipline, IPPD is not a separate discipline. It requires<br />

other disciplines to be present in order to be implemented. This is discussed<br />

in more detail in the following sections.<br />

Because the staged representation, similar to the CMM ® v1.1, addresses<br />

the <strong>process</strong> maturity of an organization, it answers the question ‘‘What will<br />

be the most likely outcome of the next project we undertake’’ [11]. The<br />

staged representation is concerned with organizational maturity.<br />

The continuous representation, similar to EIA 731, deals with <strong>improvement</strong><br />

of a single <strong>process</strong> area <strong>and</strong> answers the question ‘‘What is a good order<br />

in which to approach <strong>improvement</strong> of this <strong>process</strong> area’’ The continuous<br />

representation addresses the capability levels of <strong>process</strong> areas.<br />

Both representations contain the same components, 3 <strong>using</strong> the same<br />

wording. A major difference between the representations is in the approach<br />

to <strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong>: If an organization strives to achieve organizational<br />

maturity, it may select the staged representation. In contrast, if the organization<br />

is interested in specific <strong>process</strong> capabilities it will select the continuous<br />

representation. Equivalent staging, described later in this chapter, was developed<br />

to allow comparisons of benchmarking conducted <strong>using</strong> the continuous<br />

2. Additional bodies of knowledge may be added to the <strong>CMMI</strong> ® later. Its architecture was developed to accommodate<br />

new disciplines. The <strong>CMMI</strong> ® described in this book is <strong>CMMI</strong> ® -SE/SW/IPPD, v1.1.<br />

3. The component descriptions are the same with some well-defined variations that are explained later.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!