Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI
Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI
Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
80 Revised Frameworks: <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>9001</strong>:<strong>2000</strong> <strong>and</strong> the <strong>CMMI</strong> ®<br />
4.2.1 New to <strong>CMMI</strong> ® version 1.1<br />
The <strong>CMMI</strong> ® was developed based on the following models:<br />
• CMM ® v2.0 (draft C) for software;<br />
• EIA Interim St<strong>and</strong>ard 731, System Engineering Capability Model<br />
(SECM);<br />
• Integrated Product Development Model, draft v0.98a (IPD-CMM ® );<br />
• Software Acquisition CMM ® , v.1.02 (SA-CMM ® ).<br />
Although the CMM ® v1.1 is not officially listed as a <strong>CMMI</strong> ® predecessor<br />
model, for software organizations, the transition to <strong>CMMI</strong> ® will be from<br />
CMM ® v1.1, rather than from the unpublished CMM ® v2.0c.<br />
The <strong>CMMI</strong> ® uses a systems approach to product development <strong>and</strong> emphasizes<br />
<strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> for products (or services). The <strong>CMMI</strong> ® has two<br />
representations: staged <strong>and</strong> continuous, <strong>and</strong> several bodies of knowledge or<br />
disciplines: systems engineering, software engineering, <strong>and</strong> integrated product<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>process</strong> development (IPPD). 2 Although one can select either the software<br />
or systems engineering discipline, IPPD is not a separate discipline. It requires<br />
other disciplines to be present in order to be implemented. This is discussed<br />
in more detail in the following sections.<br />
Because the staged representation, similar to the CMM ® v1.1, addresses<br />
the <strong>process</strong> maturity of an organization, it answers the question ‘‘What will<br />
be the most likely outcome of the next project we undertake’’ [11]. The<br />
staged representation is concerned with organizational maturity.<br />
The continuous representation, similar to EIA 731, deals with <strong>improvement</strong><br />
of a single <strong>process</strong> area <strong>and</strong> answers the question ‘‘What is a good order<br />
in which to approach <strong>improvement</strong> of this <strong>process</strong> area’’ The continuous<br />
representation addresses the capability levels of <strong>process</strong> areas.<br />
Both representations contain the same components, 3 <strong>using</strong> the same<br />
wording. A major difference between the representations is in the approach<br />
to <strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong>: If an organization strives to achieve organizational<br />
maturity, it may select the staged representation. In contrast, if the organization<br />
is interested in specific <strong>process</strong> capabilities it will select the continuous<br />
representation. Equivalent staging, described later in this chapter, was developed<br />
to allow comparisons of benchmarking conducted <strong>using</strong> the continuous<br />
2. Additional bodies of knowledge may be added to the <strong>CMMI</strong> ® later. Its architecture was developed to accommodate<br />
new disciplines. The <strong>CMMI</strong> ® described in this book is <strong>CMMI</strong> ® -SE/SW/IPPD, v1.1.<br />
3. The component descriptions are the same with some well-defined variations that are explained later.