Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI
Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI
Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
236 Approaches Using <strong>ISO</strong>–<strong>CMMI</strong> ® Synergy<br />
methods to improve those <strong>process</strong>es <strong>and</strong>, in turn, <strong>process</strong> work products.<br />
The Acting phase is very sensitive. It provides the bridge between <strong>process</strong><br />
<strong>improvement</strong> activities <strong>and</strong> project production activities.<br />
A large organization will often select a project or a group of projects to<br />
pilot newly developed <strong>process</strong>es, measure their effectiveness, <strong>and</strong> collect<br />
lessons learned. After analysis of the results, the <strong>process</strong>es will be propagated<br />
throughout the organization. Smaller organizations with more limited<br />
resources may not be able to afford the pilot approach <strong>and</strong> will tend to<br />
gradually implement those new <strong>process</strong>es <strong>and</strong> measure their effectiveness<br />
as they move toward selected goals.<br />
Normally, PATs remain active during pilot efforts to collect <strong>process</strong> measurements<br />
<strong>and</strong> lessons learned <strong>and</strong> feed them back into <strong>process</strong> descriptions.<br />
The PATs disb<strong>and</strong> on pilot or <strong>process</strong> implementation completion. Continuing<br />
support <strong>and</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> become the responsibility of the EPG <strong>and</strong><br />
project change agents. Although the use of pilot projects is an effective<br />
technique, many <strong>ISO</strong> requirements will be satisfied when the <strong>process</strong> infrastructure<br />
is established <strong>and</strong> institutionalization has begun.<br />
As organizations start implementing identified <strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong>s<br />
based on their <strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> plans, they will be able to determine<br />
if the <strong>CMMI</strong> ® <strong>and</strong> <strong>ISO</strong> requirements have been satisfied <strong>and</strong> if their goals<br />
<strong>and</strong> objectives have been satisfied. The effectiveness of the introduced<br />
changes will be measured, resulting in feedback <strong>and</strong> corrective actions, if<br />
necessary.<br />
7.6 Fifth phase: Learning<br />
The Learning phase enables <strong>process</strong> practitioners <strong>using</strong> the IDEAL SM model<br />
to continue <strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> by repeating the Diagnosing <strong>and</strong> subsequent<br />
phases without going back to the Initiating phase. The EPG should analyze<br />
the whole cycle <strong>and</strong> ensure that most procedural problems are resolved in<br />
the following cycle. In most cases, the EPG will address issues stemming<br />
from the selected approach <strong>and</strong> make corrections to that approach. It will<br />
review high-level <strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> goals, remove those that were satisfied,<br />
<strong>and</strong> add new high-level goals resulting from the new needs of the<br />
organization.<br />
After lessons learned are analyzed <strong>and</strong> new goals are established, new<br />
<strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> proposals may be developed. These will result in<br />
requests to the management council for approval, funding, <strong>and</strong> resources.<br />
The Learning phase may further fine-tune the synergy implementation,<br />
for example, by adding or modifying transitioning steps, changing <strong>process</strong>