Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI
Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI
Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Index 295<br />
<strong>ISO</strong> <strong>9001</strong>:<strong>2000</strong> transition, 201–4 implementation step, 20<br />
difficulty, 201<br />
<strong>improvement</strong> confirmation step, 21<br />
gap analysis <strong>and</strong>, 202 as international st<strong>and</strong>ard, 19<br />
with <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>9001</strong>:1994/CMM ® experience,<br />
L attribute, 45<br />
233–34 management practices, 47<br />
with <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>9001</strong>:1994 experience/without<br />
N attribute, 44<br />
CMM ® experience, 229–32 needs/business goals step, 19<br />
without <strong>ISO</strong> experience/with CMM ®<br />
Part 2, 43<br />
experience, 224–29 Part 5, 43<br />
potential transition cases, 211–34<br />
Part 7, 18–19<br />
without previous <strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> parts relationship, 18<br />
experience, 212–24<br />
P attribute, 44<br />
steps, 202 performance monitoring step, 21<br />
<strong>ISO</strong> 9004:<strong>2000</strong>, 26–27<br />
<strong>process</strong> assessment step, 19–20<br />
defined, 26 <strong>process</strong> dimension, 45<br />
guidance, 26–27<br />
<strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> initiation step, 19<br />
<strong>ISO</strong>–<strong>CMMI</strong> ® synergy, 5, 7–10, 134–52 <strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> steps, 19–21<br />
acting phase, 235–36<br />
steps illustration, 20<br />
advantages, 10 two-dimensional model, 44<br />
approaches, 205–37<br />
diagnosing phase, 207–9<br />
K<br />
establishing phase, 209–36<br />
key <strong>process</strong> areas (KPAs), 38–43<br />
illustrated, 9 common features, 39–40<br />
initiating phase, 206–7<br />
goals, satisfaction of, 39<br />
institutionalization, 135–36 maturity level 2, 40–41<br />
learning phase, 236–37<br />
maturity level 3, 42<br />
management responsibility, 138–41 maturity level 4, 42<br />
measurement, analysis, <strong>improvement</strong>,<br />
maturity level 5, 42–43<br />
146–49 See also CMM ® maturity levels<br />
PAs <strong>and</strong> SPs, 136–49<br />
<strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong>, 205–6<br />
L<br />
<strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> steps based on,<br />
leadership, 62, 130<br />
216–18 Learning phase, 24<br />
product realization, 142–46<br />
defined, 24, 236<br />
QMS, 137–38 <strong>ISO</strong>–<strong>CMMI</strong> ® synergy, 236–37<br />
relationships, 124, 149–51<br />
See also IDEAL SM model<br />
resource management, 141–42<br />
<strong>ISO</strong> TR 15504, 3, 4, 17–21, 43–47<br />
M<br />
assessment output analysis step, 20<br />
managed maturity level<br />
assessment scheme, 44 defined, 38<br />
attribute indicator sets, 46<br />
KPAs, 42<br />
capability levels, 44<br />
See also CMM ® maturity levels<br />
capability levels <strong>and</strong> <strong>process</strong> attributes, 46 managed <strong>process</strong>, 158<br />
communication/teamwork guidelines, 21 management<br />
compatibility, 43<br />
configuration, 114–15, 165, 277<br />
defined, 18, 43 integrated, 106–7<br />
F attribute, 45<br />
gains sustain step, 21<br />
<strong>process</strong> approach to, 65–66<br />
project, 104–9