08.02.2015 Views

Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI

Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI

Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.3 Typical <strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> approaches 21<br />

6. Confirm <strong>improvement</strong>s. Periodically, the PEG measures <strong>and</strong> monitors<br />

<strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> progress, reports progress to the management<br />

committee, <strong>and</strong> institutes corrective actions as required. It reevaluates<br />

risks <strong>and</strong> devises mitigation actions to move the <strong>process</strong><br />

<strong>improvement</strong> project toward its goal.<br />

7. Sustain <strong>improvement</strong> gains. The PEG helps sustain <strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong><br />

gains <strong>and</strong> ensures that the organization does not revert to its<br />

previous state. The PEG supports transition of <strong>improvement</strong>s to other<br />

projects <strong>and</strong> monitors its implementation.<br />

8. Monitor performance. Process <strong>improvement</strong> requires a long-term commitment.<br />

It is not unusual for organizational goals to change over<br />

time, requiring changes in the <strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> goals. By measuring<br />

<strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> progress, senior management can redirect<br />

<strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> activities to best suit the current situation.<br />

<strong>ISO</strong> TR 15504 also recognizes the importance of cultural issues <strong>and</strong> management<br />

leadership to the success of the <strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> effort <strong>and</strong><br />

provides guidelines specifically for those issues. Guidelines for establishing<br />

effective communication <strong>and</strong> teamwork within the organization are also<br />

provided, including the following:<br />

• The need to establish a set of values;<br />

• Attitudes <strong>and</strong> behavior;<br />

• The need for a recognition <strong>and</strong> reward system;<br />

• Measurement;<br />

• Education <strong>and</strong> training requirements.<br />

2.3.3 IDEAL SM<br />

In the early 1990s, when many organizations started <strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong><br />

efforts, there were no guidelines for initiating <strong>and</strong> executing the work.<br />

Although the CMM ® for software <strong>and</strong> a compatible appraisal method existed,<br />

organizations were left to themselves to determine the most efficient way<br />

to implement <strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong>s. The CMM ® itself, by virtue of its five<br />

maturity levels, contains a global high-level <strong>process</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> strategy.<br />

However, guidance is still required to achieve effective <strong>and</strong> efficient <strong>process</strong><br />

institutionalization from the tactical point of view.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!