School Improvement - Louisiana Department of Education
School Improvement - Louisiana Department of Education
School Improvement - Louisiana Department of Education
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PLANNING<br />
GUIDANCE IN THE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROCESS<br />
• Includes all stakeholders <strong>of</strong> the school. The <strong>School</strong> <strong>Improvement</strong> Plan (SIP) is a printable report <strong>of</strong> the<br />
measures the school will undertake to reach goals that will improve student achievement.<br />
• Clarifies the school’s focus and establishes priorities as a community <strong>of</strong> learners.<br />
• Requires commitment from stakeholders to devote the time and energy to put the plan into practice.<br />
• Results in a written plan on a standardized template that<br />
→ Addresses school‐wide efforts and programs that will target improving student achievement.<br />
→ Includes all funding sources whose monies are dedicated to those research‐based strategies and<br />
its indicators <strong>of</strong> implementation to improve student learning. (Funding sources include but are<br />
not limited to Title I, II, III, IV, V, IDEA, <strong>School</strong> Choice, <strong>Education</strong> Excellence Fund (EEF), <strong>School</strong><br />
<strong>Improvement</strong> Fund, K‐3 Reading/Math Initiative, etc.).<br />
→ Includes information addressed in other separate plans; only one plan is needed to set forth<br />
school improvement. <strong>School</strong>s that are in school improvement must use the <strong>Louisiana</strong><br />
<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>’s SIP template. <strong>School</strong>s not in SI using the format from Southern<br />
Association <strong>of</strong> Colleges and <strong>School</strong>s (SACS) may submit their plans on the SACS form.<br />
→ Can also be used as the core for funding requests (i.e., grants) and programmatic submissions<br />
(e.g., Title I) to the LDE.<br />
IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN<br />
With the written/revised <strong>School</strong> <strong>Improvement</strong> Plan and the faculty’s commitment to implement its Action Plan,<br />
the work <strong>of</strong> school improvement begins by changing individual personal visions into the school’s collective shared<br />
vision and mission. Competency, capabilities and expertise to make the desired changes must expand, and the<br />
attendant discomfort worked through. Commitment to implementing the plan must be encouraged, built, and<br />
sustained. Reaching goals and achieving objectives through the use <strong>of</strong> research‐based strategies and its indicators<br />
<strong>of</strong> implementation indicates the plan is in effect. Occasionally an “implementation dip” may occur when not all <strong>of</strong><br />
the stakeholders are performing their roles in the plan. However, with sustained action and continued<br />
commitment, the implementation <strong>of</strong> the SIP is likely to be successful.<br />
EVALUATING SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT<br />
Evaluation is the means whereby schools and their staff measure the progress <strong>of</strong> implementing the strategies and<br />
activities set forth in the <strong>School</strong> <strong>Improvement</strong> Plan. Unless evaluations are planned and applied systematically and<br />
consistently at strategic times (e.g., six weeks, quarters, semesters, annually), no reliable means exist for the<br />
school to measure objectively its progress in meeting its desired objectives or to see whether the improvement<br />
activities are having the desired effect. Evaluation works best when it is part <strong>of</strong> both planning and<br />
implementation; it is at the heart <strong>of</strong> implementation checks.<br />
17