24.04.2015 Views

KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO ...

KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO ...

KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX C<br />

13.1.3 Completeness<br />

Assessment of data completeness includes the review of the following:<br />

Required samples and analyses have been processed (both field measurements and laboratory<br />

data)<br />

Complete records and documentation exist for each parameter analyzed and for associated<br />

QC samples<br />

Specified procedures have been implemented<br />

Electronic data packages are completed as required<br />

Completeness will be measured as:<br />

V<br />

C =<br />

T<br />

x 100<br />

where:<br />

C = Completeness of data in percent<br />

V = Number of required measurements judged valid<br />

T = Total number of required measurements<br />

2.40 Field Measurements<br />

Field data will be reviewed by the Project QA Officer for accuracy, precision, and completeness, taking<br />

into account overall objectives, background data points, and field QA/QC samples as defined in Section<br />

4.0 of this plan. The field results will be reviewed for compliance with established QC criteria specified<br />

in this QAPP, the FSP (Appendix A of the BWP) and any project-specific addenda. Accuracy of field<br />

measurements will be assessed using daily instrument calibration, calibration check, and analysis of<br />

blanks. Precision will be assessed on the basis of reproducibility by multiple readings of a single sample<br />

and on the basis of duplicate sample readings. Data completeness will also be assessed. The equations<br />

for calculating precision, accuracy, and completeness are presented in Section 13.1 of this plan. If<br />

additional requirements are required for a specific project, they will be defined in the project-specific<br />

plans.<br />

2.41 Laboratory Data<br />

Assessment of data in terms of the PARCC parameters is an integral part of laboratory verification<br />

process. Laboratory data are reviewed in two stages; the first stage is at the laboratory and the second<br />

stage by independent data validator(s).<br />

After data have been generated by the analyst or instrument, they will be submitted to a qualified peer<br />

(another analyst, QA Manager, group supervisor, or equivalent) for review. The initial review performed<br />

at the laboratory is for transcription errors, calculation errors, holding times, a check for completeness,<br />

contractual requirements, and to ensure that data meet the QC criteria established by the analytical<br />

method. If data exceeds QC criteria, appropriate corrective actions will be implemented, if applicable. If<br />

not, the data will be reported as such with a detailed description of the QC exceedance noted in the case<br />

narrative.<br />

Kirtland AFB<br />

Quality Assurance Project Plan C-56 April 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!