17.11.2012 Views

Editor's Foreword

Editor's Foreword

Editor's Foreword

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

352 The MiliTAry BAlAnCe 2010<br />

the Combat Vehicles Research and Development<br />

Establishment.<br />

Efforts by the Army Aviation Corps to replace<br />

obsolete assets, such as Chetak and Cheetah helicopters,<br />

were postponed after the MoD scrapped the acquisition<br />

of 197 Eurocopter Fennec light observation helicopters,<br />

despite four years of trials and evaluations.<br />

The MoD claimed there had been irregularities in the<br />

selection process. In July 2008, a new RfP was issued<br />

to at least four overseas manufacturers, stipulating<br />

that the successful bid would entail an offset requirement<br />

of 50% and the transfer of ‘maintenance-related<br />

technology’ to HAL. Bell Helicopters quickly withdrew<br />

from the tender process, saying the terms of the<br />

RfP did not provide sufficient scope for a competitive<br />

commercial bid.<br />

The army’s ambitious Field Artillery Rationalisation<br />

Plan – under which it intends to acquire a<br />

mixture of 3,600 towed, wheeled and tracked guns<br />

– is already ten years overdue. During early 2008,<br />

the MoD issued tenders for the procurement of<br />

140 ultra-light, 155mm howitzers and 180 wheeled<br />

guns. By August it had withdrawn both tenders,<br />

saying there had been an ‘inadequate’ response<br />

from overseas vendors – although observers<br />

suggested this was likely the result of bureaucratic<br />

delay and unrealistic requirements. By June 2009<br />

it appeared that the only remaining bidder for the<br />

ultra-light programme was Singapore Technologies<br />

Engineering (ST Engineering), which was offering<br />

its Pegasus gun. However, ST Engineering was<br />

one of the seven companies under the spotlight in<br />

the Central Bureau of Investigation’s corruption<br />

probe in mid 2009, so the potential deal had to be<br />

suspended.<br />

In light of India’s growing dependence on gas, oil<br />

and other commodities from all parts of the globe, the<br />

Indian Navy has begun a comprehensive programme<br />

to acquire power-projection platforms, ranging from<br />

aircraft carriers to landing platform dock ships.<br />

Over the next decade, the navy plans to field a fleet<br />

of 140–145 vessels (including two nuclear-powered<br />

submarines). Half of these will be designated oceangoing,<br />

the remainder assigned to coastal duties. The<br />

fleet will be built around two carrier battle groups:<br />

the first based on the much delayed Gorshkov and the<br />

second based on an indigenously designed, 37,500tonne<br />

‘air defence vessel’ (ADV), construction of<br />

which began in 2005. By 2022, the fleet is scheduled to<br />

have grown to 160 vessels, equipped with around 350<br />

fixed-wing and rotary aircraft.<br />

However, the acquisition of the Gorshkov is not the<br />

only naval programme holding up the navy’s ambitious<br />

modernisation plans. The ADV is at least two<br />

years late and several other projects have fallen well<br />

behind schedule, not least due to the inefficiency of<br />

domestic shipyards. Around 39 out of an order book<br />

of 44 vessels are being constructed by Indian contractors.<br />

In July 2009, the MoD acknowledged that the<br />

domestic construction of six French-designed Scorpene<br />

submarines was running at least two years behind<br />

schedule because of difficulties with the ‘absorption<br />

of technologies’. This raised questions about a potential<br />

follow-on order of another six Scorpene vessels.<br />

The navy’s lack of submarines was highlighted in a<br />

report by the CAG, which warned that India faces the<br />

prospect of operating with less than half its current<br />

fleet by 2012, when two-thirds of its submarines are<br />

due for retirement. The report said prolonged refit<br />

schedules meant the submarine fleet had been operating<br />

at as little as 48% capacity between 2002 and<br />

2006. It added that serious problems with inertial<br />

navigation systems and new sonar equipment meant<br />

several vessels were operating at sub-optimal levels.<br />

There were more encouraging developments<br />

with the navy’s plan to acquire two nuclear-powered<br />

submarines, as India finally agreed the lease of an<br />

Akula II-class vessel from Russia. The arrangement,<br />

initiated in 2004, was thrown into some doubt when<br />

the vessel in question, the Nerpa, was involved in an<br />

accident in late 2008 in which 20 sailors and technicians<br />

died through the release of freon gas. Although<br />

the sale of nuclear-powered attack submarines<br />

(SSNs) is forbidden by international treaty, leases are<br />

permitted if a vessel does not have missiles with a<br />

greater than 300km range. India is thought to have<br />

leased the submarine for ten years at a cost of around<br />

US$700m. The confirmation that the lease would<br />

go ahead was followed in July 2009 by the launch<br />

of India’s indigenously built nuclear submarine,<br />

three decades after the programme was initiated.<br />

The 6,000-tonne Advanced Technology Vessel (ATV)<br />

is reportedly based on an original Russian design,<br />

and Russian involvement in designing the ship<br />

and miniaturising its reactor has long been an open<br />

secret. However, military officials have suggested<br />

that it might be at least two years before the vessel is<br />

commissioned, and that ultimately it may be retained<br />

only as a technology-demonstrator rather than as an<br />

operational strategic asset. The hulls of two further<br />

ATV submarines have already been completed and<br />

these ships are expected to be ready by 2017.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!