10.07.2015 Views

annotated bibliography of new zealand research into family violence

annotated bibliography of new zealand research into family violence

annotated bibliography of new zealand research into family violence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ecommendations for future <strong>research</strong> are made.Source: Author’s abstractO’Neill, D. (1998). A post-structuralist review <strong>of</strong> the theoretical literature surrounding wife abuse.Violence against Women, 4(4), 457-490.See: www.nzfvc.org.nz/12943.pubTopic Areas: Intimate partner abuse, Physical abuse, Women, Legislation, Cultural factors,GenderAbstract: This article examines the various ways that the social science community hasunderstood partner abuse. The author takes a poststructuralist perspective when reviewingdifferent theories that have been used to explain wife abuse. The paper identifies fivediscourses: pathology; expressive tension; instrumental power; social system; and learnedbehaviour. The author discusses each discourse and the implications each one has for policyand practice, pointing out that the definitions and implications <strong>of</strong> the different discourses are<strong>of</strong>ten incompatible, if not in conflict.O’Neill, D., & Hodgetts, D. (2001). Men’s <strong>family</strong> <strong>violence</strong>: A comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>new</strong>s reportsand accounts <strong>of</strong> violent men. Communication Journal <strong>of</strong> New Zealand - He Kohinga Korero,2(1), 3-23.See: www.nzfvc.org.nz/13043.pubTopic Areas: Intimate partner abuse, Physical abuse, Perpetrators/<strong>of</strong>fenders, Cultural factors,Media <strong>violence</strong>Abstract: This paper reports key findings from a study involving a discourse analysis <strong>of</strong><strong>new</strong>s media coverage and perpetrator accounts <strong>of</strong> men’s <strong>violence</strong> towards their partners. The<strong>research</strong> took two forms. Firstly, the authors analysed all television <strong>new</strong>s reports broadcast in1995 on the major television networks in New Zealand. These reports overwhelminglyrepresented the problem as one <strong>of</strong> pathologically angry individuals. The actions <strong>of</strong> violentmen were placed within an intergenerational context <strong>of</strong> dysfunctional families andcommunity tolerance. Media spoke <strong>of</strong> breaking the ‘cycle <strong>of</strong> abuse’ through victims askingfor help and batterers receiving counselling. Secondly, 13 men, who had assaulted theirpartners at least once, were interviewed, and their accounts <strong>of</strong> <strong>violence</strong> analysed. In themajority <strong>of</strong> cases, the men spoke <strong>of</strong> anger problems and their inability to control their ragewhen stressed by external events, such as financial difficulties and their partner’s behaviour.O’Neill, D., & Morgan, M. (2001). Pragmatic post-structuralism (1): Participant observation anddiscourse in evaluating <strong>violence</strong> intervention. Journal <strong>of</strong> Community and Applied SocialPsychology, 11(4), 263-275.See: www.nzfvc.org.nz/13335.pubTopic Areas: Intimate partner abuse, Perpetrators/<strong>of</strong>fenders, Cultural factors, Prevention/intervention/treatmentAbstract: This paper discusses the participant observation method <strong>of</strong> <strong>research</strong> applied via apoststructuralist approach, and in particular, the use <strong>of</strong> this method in evaluating acommunity-based stopping <strong>violence</strong> programme. Whilst participant observation is <strong>of</strong>tenutilised as a method for process evaluation, its role within a post-structuralist programme is aunique application <strong>of</strong> a well-established <strong>research</strong> method. This has significant future138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!