10.07.2015 Views

annotated bibliography of new zealand research into family violence

annotated bibliography of new zealand research into family violence

annotated bibliography of new zealand research into family violence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

neglect within communities by seeking to improve community child-rearing capabilities. Anevaluation <strong>of</strong> the proposed action <strong>research</strong> model is also suggested.Hayes, M. (1999). Protecting children in England and New Zealand. Canterbury Law Review, 7(2),297-313.See: www.nzfvc.org.nz/13060.pubTopic Areas: Child abuse and neglect, Families, Children, Care and protection, Legislation,Prevention/intervention/treatmentAbstract: This article compares and contrasts child care and protection approaches in NewZealand and England. Both New Zealand and England recognise the importance <strong>of</strong> workingwith families in child protection cases. This commitment is reflected in New Zealand’sChildren, Young Persons and Their Families Act (1989), and England’s Children Act (1989),which seek to enhance the wellbeing <strong>of</strong> families. This article examines the provisions underthese pieces <strong>of</strong> legislation aimed at protecting children from abuse, and how these countriesrespond to and investigate child abuse allegations. The author critiques New Zealand’s use <strong>of</strong>Family Group Conferences, and argues that the rights and wellbeing <strong>of</strong> the child shouldprevail over that <strong>of</strong> the <strong>family</strong>.Hayne, H. (1995). Recent <strong>research</strong> on children’s drawing: Implications for theory and practice. InChildren’s Issues Centre (Ed.), (n.d.), Children’s Voices Collection. Paper presented atChildren’s Issues Centre Seminar. Dunedin, New Zealand: University <strong>of</strong> Otago, Children’sIssues Centre.See: www.nzfvc.org.nz/13255.pubTopic Areas: Child abuse and neglect, Children, JusticeAbstract: This <strong>research</strong> focused on whether or not drawing pictures influences the accuracyand content <strong>of</strong> a child’s verbal report on a particular past event. Data was collected byinterviewing children 1 week to 1 month after the event. Participants included 3- to 4-year-oldchildren in the first event, and 3-, 4-, 5- and 6-year-old children in the second event. Allchildren were from Dunedin pre-schools and primary schools. The author critiques therapistsubjectivity placed on interpretations <strong>of</strong> children’s drawings. However, the author posits thata number <strong>of</strong> therapists have proposed that drawings help facilitate a child’s memory, althoughthere is not yet any empirical evidence to support this. The results <strong>of</strong> the study show thatchildren who drew while giving a verbal report <strong>of</strong> the event reported more information duringthe interview and remained on-task for a longer period <strong>of</strong> time than those children who justgave a verbal report. Drawing may aid the memories <strong>of</strong> children, particularly when they areinterviewed about a specific event requiring accuracy <strong>of</strong> content. The author suggests thatclinical or legal interviews around abuse could benefit from drawing.Hayward, J. (2003). Rethinking section 16B Guardianship Act 1968: Toward a presumption includingpsychological abuse. Unpublished manuscript, University <strong>of</strong> Waikato, Hamilton, NewZealand.See: www.nzfvc.org.nz/13145.pubTopic Areas: Intimate partner abuse, Psychological/emotional abuse, Children, Perpetrators/<strong>of</strong>fenders, Victims/survivors, Justice, LegislationAbstract: This honours dissertation focuses on the exclusion <strong>of</strong> psychological abuse from theambit <strong>of</strong> the presumption that under a 1995 amendment to the Guardianship Act (1968) a82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!