10.07.2015 Views

annotated bibliography of new zealand research into family violence

annotated bibliography of new zealand research into family violence

annotated bibliography of new zealand research into family violence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

understanding <strong>of</strong> domestic <strong>violence</strong>, the people involved in it, and their role in policing it.While the analysis suggests <strong>of</strong>ficers continue to draw on discourses that blame victims andexonerate <strong>of</strong>fenders, it also points to a discursive shift in police discourses on policingdomestic <strong>violence</strong>, particularly with regard to its seriousness and dangerousness, theimportance <strong>of</strong> policing it, and the utility <strong>of</strong> arrest.Source: Author’s abstractOlo-Whaanga, E. (2000). Responding to mothers who are ambivalent about their child’s disclosure <strong>of</strong>sexual abuse. Unpublished master’s thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Auckland, New Zealand.See: www.nzfvc.org.nz/13144.pubTopic Areas: Child abuse and neglect, Sexual abuse, Families, Women, Children,Perpetrators/<strong>of</strong>fenders, Victims/survivors, Justice, Cultural factors, Social services,Prevention/intervention/treatmentAbstract: This <strong>research</strong> explores how some mothers may maintain a stance <strong>of</strong> ambivalence totheir child’s disclosure <strong>of</strong> sexual abuse in terms <strong>of</strong> their belief in the child’s account, or theirwillingness to support and protect their child, or both. Such mothers pose particulardifficulties for those staff charged with the responsibility for child protection. This qualitative<strong>research</strong> was carried out to explore the reasons why some mothers respond in this way, andhow this may be influenced by child protection staff members’ response to them. Two groupswere interviewed: key informants who were experienced pr<strong>of</strong>essionals working in the area;and a mother who was identified as having maintained an ambivalent response to her child’sdisclosure. The interviews were analysed using content analysis. It was found that factors thatkept mothers from believing and supporting their child include: their initial reaction <strong>of</strong> shock,disbelief and shame; self-blame; a mother’s relationship to the perpetrator; the relationshipbetween the mother and the child; cultural influences; the nature <strong>of</strong> the disclosure; lack <strong>of</strong>knowledge about child sexual abuse; and a mother’s history <strong>of</strong> victimisation. This <strong>research</strong>findings also identified helpful and unhelpful behaviours <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in aiding mothers toshift from ambivalence, to belief and support <strong>of</strong> their child. Key turning points were identifiedfrom interviews in which mothers shift from ambivalence to belief and support. These includea confession by the <strong>of</strong>fender, evidence, provision <strong>of</strong> information and education, and support.Implications for pr<strong>of</strong>essionals responding to mothers identified as ambivalent are given.Source: Author’s abstractOsborn, A. (1996). Caregivers and elders: The caregiving relationship: An exploratory study <strong>of</strong> eldermaltreatment in New Zealand. Unpublished master’s thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Canterbury,Christchurch, New Zealand.See: www.nzfvc.org.nz/13295.pubTopic Areas: Elder abuse and neglect, Physical abuse, Neglect, Families, Older persons,Perpetrators/<strong>of</strong>fenders, Mental health, Demographics/statisticsAbstract: This study was initiated to increase understanding <strong>of</strong> the causes <strong>of</strong> eldermaltreatment in New Zealand and to provide victim and perpetrator pr<strong>of</strong>iles. A small study <strong>of</strong>caregivers was undertaken and three groups compared: caregivers who physically abuse theirelderly, caregivers who neglect their elderly, and caregivers who neither neglect norphysically abuse their elderly. Results showed that differences exist between physical abuseand neglect, lending support to the argument that <strong>research</strong>ers should cease to analysemaltreatment data as though ‘elder abuse’ were a single phenomenon. Similar to overseas<strong>research</strong>, findings also indicated that neglect seemed to be more associated with the stress,141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!