<strong>European</strong> CommissionOccasional Paper 60, Volume IEuro-Mediterranean Partnership <strong>and</strong> the <strong>European</strong> Neighbourhood Policy – might foster amore positive climate for such a change.6.1 The Emergence of an EU Migration Policy <strong>and</strong> the Consideration of <strong>Labour</strong> NeedsSome of the factors that have motivated EU member states to coordinate in the field of<strong>migration</strong> policy are related to:i) the increase in challenges posed by mounting <strong>migration</strong> pressures, 35ii) labour <strong>market</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>s,iii) the necessity of cooperation in the wake of increasing EU integration <strong>and</strong> enlargementdrives, in particular the free circulation of persons within the EU implemented throughthe Schengen Agreement which came into force in 1995 in the wake of the Single<strong>European</strong> Act establishing the Single Market.The Thematic Background Paper (Venturini, Fakhoury <strong>and</strong> Jouant 2009, Sections 1.1 <strong>and</strong>1.2) provides an overview of the emergence of an EU <strong>migration</strong> policy.A turning point linking the development of the EU’s <strong>migration</strong> policy <strong>and</strong> labour <strong>market</strong>considerations was the Lisbon Strategy adopted in 2000. Since this date, more <strong>and</strong> moreattention has been given to relating integration policies to employment <strong>and</strong> labour, examiningim<strong>migration</strong> in the context of demographic ageing <strong>and</strong> skill shortages, <strong>and</strong> devising policiesthat take into consideration legal <strong>migration</strong> channels to respond to labour needs. Indeed, theLisbon Strategy was a stepping stone in the process leading to the <strong>European</strong> EmploymentStrategy. 36 It became evident that to maximize labour supply <strong>and</strong> reach these ambitiousemployment rate targets, it should take into consideration the labour <strong>and</strong> economic features ofim<strong>migration</strong>, <strong>and</strong> that these features should be integrated in a strategy that could encourageskill development <strong>and</strong> mobility. In its 2000 Communication on a Community Im<strong>migration</strong>Policy, the <strong>European</strong> Commission already underlined in that more attention should be givento the potential contributions of third-country nationals in the EU labour <strong>market</strong> <strong>and</strong> that“channels for legal im<strong>migration</strong> to the Union should now be made available for labourmigrants.” 37Another milestone in the making of an EU-wide <strong>migration</strong> policy was the Seville<strong>European</strong> Council of 2002, which focused on fighting irregular <strong>migration</strong> <strong>and</strong> stressedreadmission, hence emphasising Member States’ preoccupations with <strong>migration</strong> governance<strong>and</strong> security issues rather than with economic im<strong>migration</strong>. The Conclusions of the Councilaimed specifically at incorporating third countries as EU partners in <strong>migration</strong> management.Thus, the conclusions urged that EU cooperation with third countries include a clauseentailing joint <strong>migration</strong> management, <strong>and</strong> readmission in the case of irregular <strong>migration</strong>.35 Notably the increase in irregular <strong>migration</strong>, the need to manage <strong>migration</strong> <strong>flows</strong> <strong>and</strong> mobility as well as the free flow of workers within the EU, human trafficking, <strong>and</strong> the socioeconomiccosts of asylum.36 The Luxembourg <strong>European</strong> Council in November 1997 launched the <strong>European</strong> Employment Strategy (EES), also known as 'the Luxembourg process' whose aim is to reform the EUeconomic agenda <strong>and</strong> meet challenges posed by the EU labour <strong>market</strong>’s needs <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>s. The objectives fixed by this strategy revolve around full employment, quality of work <strong>and</strong>productivity.37 Communication from the Commission to the Council <strong>and</strong> the <strong>European</strong> Parliament on a Community Im<strong>migration</strong> Policy, Brussels 22.11.200, COM (2000) 757 final, p. 3, available fromhttp://www.statewatch.org/docbin/com/30.00757.pdf.82
Chapter IFinal ReportWhile progress was made on the integration of third-country migrants working within theEU, a structured labour-<strong>migration</strong> strategy targeting legal economic im<strong>migration</strong> <strong>and</strong> firstentry of third-country migrants for employment activities lagged behind. Therefore, a moreconcrete approach on how first-entry could benefit EU economic competitiveness remainedunderdeveloped. This was particularly evident in the following illustrative cases. In July2001, the Commission presented a proposal drafting conditions <strong>and</strong> rules of admissiontargeting entry <strong>and</strong> residence of migrants for the purpose of paid employment <strong>and</strong> selfemploymentactivities. 38 As there was no consensus on this issue, the Commission had towithdraw this proposal in 2006. The difficulty of adopting common legal positions withregard to labour <strong>migration</strong> among Member States was highlighted once again in regard to theHague Programme (Carrera 2007, p. 4). Indeed, the <strong>European</strong> Council made clear here thatlabour im<strong>migration</strong> was a national competence <strong>and</strong> that adopting common legal positions withregard to labour migrants was still far-fetched. Again, in 2007 the Commission proposed theadoption of common sanctions for employers recruiting third-country nationals withoutemployment permission. However, this proposal has faced strident opposition <strong>and</strong> has notbeen adopted as yet. 39In sum, the <strong>European</strong> Commission’s emphasis on developing a common labour <strong>migration</strong>framework has been at odds with the desire of EU Member States to retain their prerogativesin this sphere <strong>and</strong> to resist a community policy which would circumscribe or curb nationaldecision-making. These inherent tensions at the EU level not only hindered the elaboration ofa common EU labour strategy, but have indirectly got in the way of identifying <strong>and</strong>responding to labour-<strong>market</strong> needs in the Euro-Mediterranean region.6.2 The Global Approach to Migration <strong>and</strong> Economic Im<strong>migration</strong> since 2005: an Integrative orPartial Process?Since 2005, the interconnectedness between establishing <strong>and</strong> regulating legal <strong>migration</strong>channels, a more holistic approach to <strong>migration</strong>, <strong>and</strong> a more coherent EU labour strategy withregard to economic im<strong>migration</strong> has been stressed.On the one h<strong>and</strong>, more attention is paid to the need to regulate <strong>migration</strong> <strong>flows</strong> in order tofight irregular <strong>migration</strong> <strong>and</strong> address challenges linked to demographic gaps in Europe <strong>and</strong>their repercussions on labour <strong>market</strong>s. For instance, in December 2005, the Commissionissued a Policy Plan on Legal Migration which further set out the roadmap that the EU wouldembark on in order to concretise the Hague Programme. 40 This policy plan explicitlyaddresses policy features <strong>and</strong> legislative measures related to economic migrants such as theconditions of entry <strong>and</strong> residence of economic migrants. More specifically, it puts forwardfive legislative proposals on economic im<strong>migration</strong> to be adopted in the period 2007-2009<strong>and</strong> divides economic migrants into four categories: highly qualified workers, seasonal38 <strong>European</strong> Commission, “Proposal for a Council Directive on the conditions of entry <strong>and</strong> residence for the purpose of paid employment <strong>and</strong> self-employment activities”, COM (2001)0386 final, Brussels,http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2001:0386:FIN:EN:PDF.39 “Proposal for a Directive of the <strong>European</strong> Parliament <strong>and</strong> of the Council providing for sanctions against employers of illegally staying third-country nationals " COM (2007) 249 final,Brussels,http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52007PC0249:EN:NOT.40 Communication from the Commission – Policy Plan on Legal Migration SEC(2005)1680,http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2005/com2005_0669en01.pdf.83
- Page 5 and 6:
STUDYLABOUR MARKETS PERFORMANCE AND
- Page 7 and 8:
Table of ContentsLABOUR MARKETS PER
- Page 10:
8.1 Actual migration and consumptio
- Page 15 and 16:
Chapter IFinal Report 15 MILLION NE
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter IFinal Report …so that MI
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter IFinal Reportroots). The cu
- Page 21 and 22:
Chapter IFinal Report In AMCs, REMI
- Page 23 and 24:
Chapter IFinal Reportpolicies. This
- Page 25 and 26:
Chapter IFinal ReportMediterranean
- Page 27 and 28:
Chapter IFinal ReportMore recently,
- Page 29 and 30:
Chapter IFinal Reportfor EU employm
- Page 31 and 32:
Chapter IFinal Reportchosen, these
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter IFinal Reportexit of women
- Page 35 and 36: Chapter IFinal ReportFigure 1.2.1.
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter IFinal ReportA Declining Em
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter IFinal ReportThe same year,
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter IFinal ReportTable 2.2.1. I
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter IFinal Reportminimum wages
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter IFinal Report2.4 Unemployme
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter IFinal ReportYouth Unemploy
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter IFinal ReportBut one should
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter IFinal Reportmillion) 10 .
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter IFinal Reportmight intensif
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter IFinal Reporttrue labour ma
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter IFinal Reportto reform the
- Page 59 and 60: Chapter IFinal ReportFrom a differe
- Page 61 and 62: Chapter IFinal ReportTable 4.2.1 Ou
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter IFinal ReportSource: Adams
- Page 65 and 66: Chapter IFinal Reportin the destina
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter IFinal ReportIn conclusion,
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter IFinal Reportorganised in B
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter IFinal Reportsecond Intifad
- Page 73 and 74: Chapter IFinal Reportstands at 29.7
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter IFinal Reportconstruction w
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter IFinal ReportAs far as the
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter IFinal Reportother cases, l
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter IFinal Reportunemployment a
- Page 83: Chapter IFinal Reportof Egypt, so f
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter IFinal ReportThese reservat
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter IFinal ReportAs Figure 6.3.
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter IFinal Reportin skill devel
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter IFinal ReportThe Directive
- Page 95 and 96: Chapter IFinal ReportThe need for
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter IFinal Reportobjectives are
- Page 99 and 100: Chapter IFinal Reporttrue Euro-Medi
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter IFinal Report- Putting empl
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter IFinal Report promotion of
- Page 105 and 106: Chapter IFinal ReportOtherADAMS, R.
- Page 107 and 108: Chapter IFinal ReportDE BEL-AIR, F.
- Page 109 and 110: Chapter IFinal ReportGUPTA, S., C.
- Page 111 and 112: Chapter IFinal ReportOECD (2000): M
- Page 113 and 114: Chapter II - Thematic Background Pa
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 123 and 124: Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 125 and 126: Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 127 and 128: Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 129 and 130: Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 133 and 134: Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 135 and 136:
Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 137 and 138:
Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 139 and 140:
Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 141 and 142:
Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 143 and 144:
Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 145 and 146:
Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 147 and 148:
Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 149 and 150:
Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 151 and 152:
Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 153 and 154:
Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 159 and 160:
Chapter IIThe impact of migration o
- Page 161 and 162:
Chapter III - Thematic Background P
- Page 163 and 164:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 165 and 166:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 167 and 168:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 173 and 174:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 175 and 176:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 177 and 178:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 179 and 180:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 181 and 182:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 183 and 184:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 185 and 186:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 187 and 188:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 189 and 190:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 191 and 192:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 193 and 194:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 195 and 196:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 197 and 198:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 199 and 200:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 201 and 202:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 203 and 204:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 205 and 206:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa
- Page 207:
Chapter IIIEU Migration Policy towa