28.11.2012 Views

Newlands Cross Upgrade EIS - European Investment Bank

Newlands Cross Upgrade EIS - European Investment Bank

Newlands Cross Upgrade EIS - European Investment Bank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

South Dublin County Council N7 <strong>Newlands</strong> <strong>Cross</strong> <strong>Upgrade</strong><br />

Environmental Impact Statement<br />

Arup Consulting Engineers<br />

(a) the combined expected maximum traffic noise level, i.e. the relevant noise level,<br />

from the proposed road scheme together with other traffic in the vicinity is greater<br />

than the design goal, and;<br />

(b) the relevant noise level is at least 1dB more than the expected traffic noise level<br />

without the proposed road scheme in place, and;<br />

(c) the contribution to the increase in the relevant noise level from the proposed road<br />

scheme is at least 1dB.<br />

These conditions will ensure that mitigation measures arising out of this process are based<br />

upon the impact of the scheme under consideration.<br />

This Design Goal is applicable to new road schemes only. In <strong>EIS</strong> terms, this means that it is<br />

to be applied to existing receptors in respect of both the opening year and the design year (i.e.<br />

15 years after projected year of opening).<br />

Note in this case, a case design year of 2025 has been assessed.<br />

It is stated that the Authority acknowledges that it may not always be sustainable to achieve<br />

this design goal. In such circumstances, nevertheless, a structured approach should be taken<br />

in order to ameliorate as far as practicable road traffic noise through the consideration of<br />

measures such as alignment changes, barrier type (e.g. earth mounds) or low noise road<br />

surfaces.<br />

8.2 Description of Existing Conditions<br />

8.2.1 Environmental Noise Survey<br />

Environmental noise surveys were conducted in order to quantify the existing noise<br />

environment in the vicinity of noise-sensitive locations that may be affected by the proposed<br />

road development.<br />

8.2.2 Methodology<br />

Unattended Measurement Procedure<br />

The unattended measurements were conducted using a Brüel & Kjær Type 3592<br />

Environmental Kit, a Brüel & Kjær Type 2238 Sound Level Meter. The measurement<br />

apparatus was check calibrated before and after the survey using a Brüel & Kjær Type 4231<br />

Sound Level Calibrator. The results were saved to the instrument memory for later analysis.<br />

Unmanned continuous measurements were conducted over 24-hour periods at one location.<br />

LA10(18hour) values are derived from the results of the continuous monitoring by taking the<br />

arithmetic average of the eighteen hourly sample values between 06:00hrs and 24:00hrs.<br />

Lden values are derived directly from the measured data.<br />

Attended Measurement Procedure<br />

The attended measurements were performed using Brüel & Kjær Type 2250 Sound Level<br />

Meter. Short-term measurements were conducted at survey locations on a cyclical basis.<br />

Sample periods were 15 minutes. The results were noted onto a Survey Record Sheet<br />

immediately following each sample, and were also saved to the instrument memory for later<br />

analysis where appropriate. Survey personnel noted all primary noise sources contributing to<br />

noise build-up.<br />

The bulk of the survey work was conducted in accordance with the attended measurement<br />

procedure as specified in the NRA Guidance.<br />

December 2007 Page 118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!