lg HZStep1 @KêWD L0-0.5-1-1.5-2-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3lg HTime @secDLFig. 10: Unit step response ZStep1(t) is time integrated impulse responseZ1(t), which in turn is inverse Laplace transform of Z1(s) in Fig.9 (12).Z 2 connected to ground in Fig.9, physically reasonable functionsZStep 1, 2 (t) are obtained by the procedure and the correspondingFoster R i , C i can be read of from the Z 1, 2 (s)when they are composed in partial fractions. The ZStep 1 (t)curve is shown in Fig.10 as double logarithmic plot. TheZStep 2 (t) curve shows only minor deviations from ZStep 1 (t).The Z 1, 2 (s) always had poles only on the negative s-axesand no complex poles. For poor approximation of the originaldata by model (2) in the time domain this is no longertrue. The real problem, however, is the transfer impedanceZ 3 (s) between the heat sources. For the example under considerationthis function always revealed completely unphysicalbehaviour, e.g. by poles on the positive axes with correspondingexponential increase in the time domain or by oscillations.Also in cases with stable circuit impedance nophysical behaviour of ZStep 3 (t) could be obtained.This failure might be related to the approximation methodfor the impedance matrix (2), which is accurate in time domainbut not necessarily so in the frequency domain, whereall impedances are represented by Foster RC-chains (4). Ashas however been pointed out in section IV, some impedancelinks in the network model (Fig.6, 8) may better be representedby polynomials in s.Therefore it seems to be generally not advisable to proceedfor the determination of the network parameters in theway indicated here. A better way would be to determine thenetwork admittances y ik (t) directly in the time domain bymeasurement or simulation as suggested at the end of sectionIII. A one port link y ik (t) can be fitted by a product of a polynomialin t with a linear combination of exponentials in t.This function can exactly be transformed in Laplace domainfor the determination of the corresponding R, C, L circuitelements. Further investigations have to be done.CONCLUSIONSThe suggested new network model, which uses only oneportimpedance links, allows for the determination of both:the transient temperatures at specified thermal contacts andthe associated heat flows at the contact areas. The networkhas a considerable advantage in determining model- parameterscompared to previous models with Cauer three terminallinks. When m is the number of thermal device contact areasand p the number of heat sources, the model is characterizedby (m + p +1) (m + p) / 2 one-port impedances with its associatedR, C, L elements. One presented methodology for the24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italydetermination of the network parameters poses in manycases a highly ill conditioned problem, which may render theresults useless. As alternative method direct measurement/simulation of the model link admittances y ik (t) in the timedomain is recommended for determining the parameters.REFERENCES[1] M.N. Sabry, “Dynamic Compact Thermal Models”, lecture presented atTHERMINIC, Madrid, Spain, Oct. 2002.[2] C.J.M. Lasance, D. den Hertog, and P. Stehouwer, “Creation andEvaluation of Compact Models for Thermal Characterization UsingDedicated Optimization Software,” in Proc. IEEE SEMI-THERM XV,San Diego, USA, 1999, pp.189-200.[3] H. Rosten, C.J.M. Lasance, and J. Parry, “The world of thermal characterizationaccording to DELPHI- Part I: Background to DELPHI” and“Part II: Experimental and Numerical Methods,” IEEE Trans. Comp.,Hybrids, Manufact. Technol., vol. 20, pp.384-398, Dec. 1997.[4] M.N. Sabry, “Static and dynamic thermal modeling of ICs,” MicroelectronicJ. vol. 30, pp.1085-1091, 1999.[5] H. Pape and G. Noebauer, “Generation and verification of boundary independentcompact thermal models for active components according tothe DELPHI / SEED methods,” in Proc. IEEE SEMI-THERM XV, SanDiego, CA, 1999, pp.201-207.[6] Y.C. Gerstenmaier, H. Pape, and G. Wachutka, “Rigorous model andnetwork for static thermal problems,” Microelectronic J., vol. 33,pp.711-718, 2002.[7] F. Christiaens, B. Vandevelde, E. Beyne, R. Mertens, and J. Berghmans,“A Generic Methodology for Deriving Compact Dynamic ThermalModels, Applied to the PSGA package,” IEEE Trans. on Components,Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, Part A Vol 21, No.4, pp 565-576, 1998.[8] M. Rencz and V. Székely, “Dynamic thermal multiport modeling of ICpackages,” IEEE Trans. on Comp. Packag. Technol., vol 24, No.4, pp596-604, 2001.[9] Y.C. Gerstenmaier and G. Wachutka, “Rigorous model and network fortransient thermal problems,” Microelectronic J., vol. 33, pp.719-725,2002.[10] D. Schweitzer and H. Pape, “Boundary Condition Independ-ent DynamicThermal Compact Models of IC-Packages,” Proc. 9thTHERMINIC, Aix-en-Provence, France, Sept. 2003, pp.225-230.[11] W. Batty , C. Christofferson, A.J. Panks, S. David, C.M. Snowden, andM.B. Steer, “Electrothermal CAD of Power De-vices and Circuits withFully Physical Time-Dependent Compact Thermal Modeling of ComplexNonlinear 3-D Systems,” IEEE Trans. Comp. Packag. Technol.,Vol.24, No.4, pp. 566-590, 2001.[12] L. Codecasa, D. D’Amore, P. Maffezzoni, “Compact Thermal Networksfor Modeling Packages,” IEEE Trans. Comp. Packag. Technol., vol.27,pp.96-103, Mar. 2004.[13] Y.C. Gerstenmaier, G. Wachutka, “Efficient Calculation of TransientTemperature Fields Responding to Fast Changing Heat-sources OverLong Duration in Power Electronic Systems,” IEEE Trans. Comp.Packag. Technol., vol.27, pp.104-111, Mar. 2004.[14] Y.C. Gerstenmaier, A. Castellazzi, G. Wachutka, “Electro-thermalSimulation of Multichip-Modules with Novel Transient Thermal Modeland Time-Dependent Boundary Conditions,” IEEE Trans. Power Electronics,vol.21, pp.45-55, Jan. 2006.[15] M.N. Sabry, “Effect of heat flux patterns on the precision of compactthermal models,” Proc. 10th THERMINIC, Sophia Antipolis, France,Oct. 2004.[16] V. Székely, “Identification of RC networks by deconvolution: chancesand limits,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst.-I, vol. CAS-45, pp.244-258,March 1998.[17] Y.C. Gerstenmaier, W. Kiffe, G. Wachutka, “Combination of thermalsubsystems by use of rapid circuit transformation and extended two-porttheory,” submitted to Microelectronic J..[18] L. Weinberg, Network Analysis and Synthesis, New York, McGraw-Hill,1962.[19] Wai-Kai Chen, The Circuits and Filters Handbook, chapters 73 – 76,2nd edition, CRC Press, 2003.©<strong>EDA</strong> <strong>Publishing</strong>/THERMINIC 2008 75ISBN: 978-2-35500-008-9
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyAutomatic Electro-Thermal Analysis in MentorGraphics PCB Design SystemK.O. Petrosjanc, P.A. KozynkoElectronics and Electrical Engineering Dept.Moscow State Institute of Electronics and MathematicsMentor Graphics Training Center – MIEMMoscow, Russia, eande@miem.edu.ru, +7 (495) 235-50-42Abstract-Automatic electro-thermal analysis is included intoMentor Graphics PCB Design System. The method ofsimultaneous iteration is used for board-level electro-thermalsimulation. New software tool named TransPower is introducedto couple the electrical (Analog Designer) and thermal(BETAsoft) simulators. The design procedure is fullyautomated, human errors are eliminated, simulation time issignificantly decreased, while accuracy and reliability areincreased.Index Terms- Electro-thermal modeling, automation, PCB.Expedition PCBDesign CaptureAnalog DesignerI. INTRODUCTIONIn modern PCBs component density and operation speedare constantly growing, as result, power densities andtemperatures of components are growing too. In additionmutual thermal interconnections between the componentsbecome important.So the correct thermal modeling is necessary to predict thePCB real behaviour.Nowadays the 2D/3D thermal simulators are used incommercial PCB design systems [1-6] to manually optimizethe placement of components from thermal standpoint.In modern PCBs the electrical parameters of discretesemiconductor devices and IC chips strongly depend on thejunction temperatures. So PCB design methodology basedon self-consistent electro-thermal simulation is mosteffective [7].The original Mentor Graphics flow-chart of thermal PCBanalysis is shown in Fig. 1. It’s seen in Fig. 1 that thepopular thermal simulator BETAsoft-Board [4] is added intoMentor Graphics Expedition PCB Design Flow.Unfortunately, the data transmission of component powersP i from Analog Designer to BETAsoft and componenttemperatures T i from BETAsoft to Analog Designer iscarried out manually by user [5].BETAsoftExpedition PCB4BETAsoftcomponent powers P iData transmissionis manual and time-consumingcomponent temperatures T iFig 1. Original Mentor Graphics flow-chart ofthermal PCB analysis.Design Capture52TransPowerAutomatedEl-Therm simulation67Analog Designer1 3Fig. 2. New fully automated electro-thermal PCB analysis scheme.©<strong>EDA</strong> <strong>Publishing</strong>/THERMINIC 2008 76ISBN: 978-2-35500-008-9
- Page 1 and 2:
http://cmp.imag.fr/conferences/ther
- Page 3 and 4:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italy©
- Page 5 and 6:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italy©
- Page 7 and 8:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italy©
- Page 9 and 10:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyBL
- Page 11 and 12:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalySe
- Page 13 and 14:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyED
- Page 15 and 16:
Staggered Cartesian meshes tolerate
- Page 17 and 18:
VIII. THE CASE FOR MCAD-EMBEDDED EC
- Page 19 and 20:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyTr
- Page 21 and 22:
solution to the eikonal equation(
- Page 23 and 24:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyS
- Page 25 and 26:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyTr
- Page 27 and 28:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italyda
- Page 29 and 30:
q (RthΣ, t)q (R th , t )10.80.60.4
- Page 31 and 32:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyEv
- Page 33 and 34:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italy*R
- Page 35 and 36: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italy[7
- Page 37 and 38: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyNe
- Page 39 and 40: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyS=
- Page 41 and 42: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyVI
- Page 43 and 44: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italyth
- Page 45 and 46: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italypr
- Page 47 and 48: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyFi
- Page 49 and 50: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyPo
- Page 51 and 52: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyWL
- Page 53 and 54: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyTa
- Page 55 and 56: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyII
- Page 57 and 58: Thermal resistance (K/W)0.250.200.1
- Page 59 and 60: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyB.
- Page 61 and 62: temperatrue rise [K]76543210Sim0,00
- Page 63 and 64: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyCo
- Page 65 and 66: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyPr
- Page 67 and 68: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyPr
- Page 69 and 70: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyBl
- Page 71 and 72: conclusion, every tile is contacted
- Page 73 and 74: and B10), three space blocks (W4, W
- Page 75 and 76: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyMu
- Page 77 and 78: After having determined the k eff v
- Page 79 and 80: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyVI
- Page 81 and 82: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyTh
- Page 83 and 84: PTjunc24-26 September 2008, Rome, I
- Page 85: tures - has been shown previously [
- Page 89 and 90: IV.CONCLUSIONSMentor Graphics Exped
- Page 91 and 92: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyIn
- Page 93 and 94: III. HEDORIS SIMULATIONSThermal sim
- Page 95 and 96: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italytr
- Page 97 and 98: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyDe
- Page 99 and 100: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyII
- Page 101 and 102: datasheets, these values are usuall
- Page 103 and 104: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italyte
- Page 105 and 106: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyCo
- Page 107 and 108: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italy20
- Page 109 and 110: material to handle difficulties suc
- Page 111 and 112: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyAt
- Page 113 and 114: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italymo
- Page 115 and 116: heatspreaders deposited during the
- Page 117 and 118: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyTh
- Page 119 and 120: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italyla
- Page 121 and 122: Fig. 13 Transient of the output dio
- Page 123 and 124: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyIn
- Page 125 and 126: chamber to calibrate the thermal te
- Page 127 and 128: V.Table 2: FE-Simulation test-matri
- Page 129 and 130: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyCo
- Page 131 and 132: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italy(c
- Page 133 and 134: Case coverSupercapacitor n°2Electr
- Page 135 and 136: 24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italyfr
- Page 137 and 138:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyTA
- Page 139 and 140:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyTh
- Page 141 and 142:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italych
- Page 143 and 144:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyDe
- Page 145 and 146:
Peltier control units (PCUs). The t
- Page 147 and 148:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyTh
- Page 149 and 150:
every step: the fewer cells the mor
- Page 151 and 152:
TABLE IIEffect of multiplication-bl
- Page 153 and 154:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyTh
- Page 155 and 156:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyRe
- Page 157 and 158:
Drain source leakage current (A)Rev
- Page 159 and 160:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyFP
- Page 161 and 162:
V IN =V DD /2Fig. 5. Short circuit
- Page 163 and 164:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyTh
- Page 165 and 166:
The overall objective of the NANOPA
- Page 167 and 168:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyRe
- Page 169 and 170:
predictions show that carbon nanotu
- Page 171 and 172:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyFl
- Page 173 and 174:
55. Campbell, R.C., S.E. Smith, and
- Page 175 and 176:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyCo
- Page 177 and 178:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyTh
- Page 179 and 180:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyEX
- Page 181 and 182:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italyen
- Page 183 and 184:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyKE
- Page 185 and 186:
An original three-step etch process
- Page 187 and 188:
with a network of built-in sensors
- Page 189 and 190:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italyan
- Page 191 and 192:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyFu
- Page 193 and 194:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyFi
- Page 195 and 196:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyFi
- Page 197 and 198:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyWe
- Page 199 and 200:
semiconductors is of the order of 1
- Page 201 and 202:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyDu
- Page 203 and 204:
transistor, through the bulk and be
- Page 205 and 206:
impedance behaviour and on the othe
- Page 207 and 208:
Tungstenmicro-heaterGas SensingMate
- Page 209 and 210:
Tungsten micro-heater resistance (
- Page 211 and 212:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyPo
- Page 213 and 214:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyT3
- Page 215 and 216:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyEv
- Page 217 and 218:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyD.
- Page 219 and 220:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyOn
- Page 221 and 222:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyAc
- Page 223 and 224:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italy
- Page 225 and 226:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyLO
- Page 227 and 228:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italymu
- Page 229 and 230:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, Italy(R
- Page 231 and 232:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyPr
- Page 233 and 234:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyPa
- Page 235 and 236:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyEl
- Page 237 and 238:
Temperature rise (°C)1,81,61,41,21
- Page 239 and 240:
i résistances carbone (A)i résist
- Page 241 and 242:
calculates the dissipation distribu
- Page 243 and 244:
in the next. It can also be used to
- Page 245 and 246:
allows creating special methods of
- Page 247 and 248:
OLED device (see Fig. 2.) provided
- Page 249 and 250:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyFi
- Page 251 and 252:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyIn
- Page 253:
24-26 September 2008, Rome, ItalyWa