defaults, cumulative risk assessment, and development of a framework <strong>for</strong> humanhealth risk assessment to in<strong>for</strong>m decision making. The Action Plan <strong>for</strong> AdvancingHuman Health <strong>Risk</strong> Assessment will be the guide to development of the future directionof human health risk assessment at EPA. This presentation will present detailsof the Action Plan and highlight the progress to date on specific projects included inthe Action Plan.T2-G.1 Fleishman LA, Bruine de Bruin W, Morgan MG; lauren@cmu.eduCarnegie Mellon University, RAND CorporationINFORMED PUBLIC CHOICES FOR LOW-CARBON ELECTRICITYPORTFOLIOS USING A PORTFOLIO-BUILDING COMPUTER DECI-SION TOOLPublic perceptions of low-carbon electricity generating technologies, such asnuclear, wind, natural gas, and coal with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), mayaffect the feasibility of their widespread deployment as part of a national energy policy.In this study, we asked 69 members of the general public to use an interactive computertool to construct a portfolio of low-carbon electricity technologies that wouldreduce CO2 emissions while reliably meeting future increases in electricity demand<strong>for</strong> Pennsylvania. As participants made changes to their portfolios, the tool providedimmediate feedback about projected CO2 emissions, electricity cost, as well as health,land and water impacts. Participants also received comparative and balanced in<strong>for</strong>mationabout the costs, risks, benefits and limitations of each of the ten electricitytechnologies. Overall, our in<strong>for</strong>med participants designed diverse portfolios includingenergy efficiency, nuclear, integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) coal withCCS, natural gas and wind. While most participants included only a relatively smallamount of IGCC with CCS, natural gas and wind in their portfolio designs, they didinclude much larger amounts of nuclear and energy efficiency. Participants scoredwell on computer tool comprehension questions. Moreover, their portfolio designswere consistent over time and with the technology preferences that they providedprior to using the computer tool. Our results suggest that the computer tool and itssupplemental materials can help to educate people about the challenges the U.S. facesin trying to achieve a low-carbon energy future, and to elicit their preferences <strong>for</strong>national energy policies.98P.64 Fleming CR, Di Giulio RT, Lambert JC; fleming.carrie@epa.govOak Ridge Institute <strong>for</strong> Science and Education; Duke University, US Environmental ProtectionAgency, Cincinnati, OHUSING INFORMATION FROM ALTERNATIVE MODELS TO GUIDERESEARCH IN MIXTURES: A CASE STUDY ON INTERACTIONS BE-TWEEN POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHS) WITHDIFFERENT MECHANISMS OF ACTION IN ZEBRAFISHChemicals commonly occur in the environment in complex mixtures in whichadditive, synergistic, and antagonistic interactions can occur, potentially resulting intoxicity that is difficult to predict without knowledge about the interactions betweenthe individual chemical constituents. Experiments assessing interactions can be costlydue to the high number of treatment groups needed. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) providea useful model <strong>for</strong> such studies due to their small size, inexpensive maintenance, rapidbreeding cycle, large number of offspring, and transparent early life stages. We presenta case study using developing zebrafish to assess potential mechanisms of binaryinteractions between PAHs. PAHs have historically been assumed to act additivelyin mixtures due to the limited in<strong>for</strong>mation about interactions between PAHs. In zebrafish,PAHs that act as aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonists (benzo[a]pyrene(BaP), benzo[k]fluoranthene, β-naphthoflavone) and PAHs that inhibit CYP1A activity(fluoranthene, carbazole, dibenzothiophene, 2-aminoanthracene, ^-naphthoflavone)interact synergistically to induce developmental toxicity. Inhibition of CYP1Aactivity by morpholino (antisense oligonucleotide) or by hypoxia also increases thetoxicity of some AhR agonist PAHs. However, hypoxia and CYP1A-morpholino microinjectionwere both shown to protect from the embryotoxicity of pyrene, a weakAhR agonist. There is some evidence of the relevance of these interactions in rodents.CYP1A1 knockout mice treated with BaP show elevated levels of BaP-DNAadducts, immune suppression and liver toxicity compared with wild type mice. Thiscase illustrates the utility of zebrafish as a high-throughput, inexpensive screeningtool to guide future research on mixtures in mammalian systems. The views expressedin this abstract are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views orpolicies of the US EPA.M3-J.3 Forshee RA, Simonetti A, Fernando AM; richard.<strong>for</strong>shee@fda.hhs.govUS Food and Drug AdministrationA MATHEMATICAL COMPARTMENT MODEL FOR ESTIMATINGDONOR LOSS DUE TO CHANGES IN THE INTER-DONATION IN-TERVALCurrent policy in the United States requires donors of a red blood cell unit towait at least 56 days between blood donations to allow adequate red cell recovery, andreduce the risk of anemia among frequent donors. Recent Blood Products AdvisoryCommittee (BPAC) meetings have discussed the risks and benefits of increasing the
inter-donation interval to mitigate iron deficiency in frequent blood donors whilepreserving an adequate blood supply. Increasing the inter-donation interval allowsmore time <strong>for</strong> recovery of iron stores, but the concern is that such a change maynegatively affect the blood supply by reducing the donation rate of frequent donors.A related issue is that data have been presented that suggest the current hemoglobinthresholds <strong>for</strong> donation may allow potentially iron deficient males to donate bloodand a significant number of female donors considered ‘normal’ may be deferred fromdonation. Low hemoglobin concentration is the most common cause of donor loss,and hemoglobin deferrals have a negative effect on donor return rates. In order toaddress this complex issue, CBER investigators explored what the potential blooddonor loss would be due to changes in the inter-donation interval. An Ordinary DifferentialEquation (ODE) compartment model, which defined rates at which eligibledonors donate, depending on the inter-donation deferral time, and rates at whichdeferred donors become eligible, was developed. The sum of the two compartmentsrepresented the total number of potential donors, while a counter described the totalnumber of donations accumulated. Results from the model applied to empirical dataand data gathered from the American Red Cross (ARC) showed that the compartmentmodel is a useful tool <strong>for</strong> investigating potential changes in the blood donor loss.P.47 Foster SA, Chrostowski PC, Porter TJ; sf@cpfassociates.comCPF Associates, Inc., Wheelabrator Environmental Technologies, Inc.ULTRAFINE PARTICLES IN COMBUSTION SOURCE EMISSIONS:THE ROLE OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY FACILITIESOver the past decade, in<strong>for</strong>mation about potential adverse human health effectsof ultrafine particles has raised concerns about human health risks from ultrafineparticle emissions from many industrial and commercial sectors, and all typesof combustions sources including waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities. This paper presentsultrafine particle number concentrations reported from numerous recent studiesworldwide <strong>for</strong> a wide variety of different sources, including WTE facilities, powerplants, motor vehicles and household activities, and in ambient air. For example, measuredparticle number concentrations in WTE facility stack emissions have been reportedto range from roughly 60 - 200,000 particles/cm3. Concentrations in fossilfuel and biomass combustion emissions have been reported to range from 140,000- 600,000,000 particles/cm3 and in vehicle emissions at 5,000 - 10,000,000 particles/cm3. Concentrations along roadways have been reported at roughly 800 - 1,000,000particles/cm3 and in ambient air from roughly 2,000 - 130,000 particles/cm3. Thepaper also discusses challenges related to estimating exposures and potential risks, ina risk assessment framework, associated with combustion source emissions of ultrafineparticles. While more research is still needed, available data indicate that ultrafineparticle emissions from WTE facilities have a minor impact on ultrafine particle concentrationsin ambient air compared to many other stationary combustion sourcesand motor vehicles. Potential downwind ambient air concentrations associated withWTE ultrafine particle emissions are also substantially lower than concentrations resultingfrom some household cooking activities and concentrations already present inbackground ambient air.P.73 Foster CB; cfoster1225@aol.comUniversity of South CarolinaIMPACTS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CITIZENS’ SCHOOLSON EXPERT PRESENTERSScience and technology make possible much that wasn’t just 10 years ago ‘longer,healthier lives; bigger, faster-growing foods; cheaper, cleaner power,’ but theseadvances carry risks non-experts often don’t expect or understand. Deficits in the“public understanding of science” can lead to unrealistic expectations and preventcitizens from effectively engaging in science policy making. Helping citizens understandtheir work has challenged the scientific community, which rarely prepares itsmembers <strong>for</strong> such work or rewards them <strong>for</strong> it. Researchers studying the ways scientistsspeak about science to nonscientists have called <strong>for</strong> a shift from a “deficit model”of science communication, in which experts perceive their role as communicatorsof in<strong>for</strong>mation to lay publics lacking science knowledge, toward a more interactivemodel. Ideally, such a dialogic or deliberative approach has impacts on the experts’ways of knowing and speaking about their work, as well as on the public’s understandingand expectations of that work. A number of studies have explored experts’perspectives in the risk communication process, but most have featured perceptionsof scientists who had little or no experience with public engagement. The proposedpresentation will draw on in-depth interviews with experts (n=21) from a varietyof disciplines who participated in a series of public engagement <strong>for</strong>ums called Citizens’Schools (covering environment, energy, and nanotechnology issues). With thepurpose of evaluating an existing model of science and risk communication, thisresearch explores benefits/drawbacks of the Citizens’ Schools <strong>for</strong>ums in promotingeffective communication between experts and lay citizens. Initial analysis of the datasuggest that this type of communication has the potential to make experts better (andmore willing) communicators by teaching them to listen as well as talk, and to makethem better researchers by allowing them to see their research from the perspectivesof non-scientists.W4-C.2 Fowler BA, Abadin H, Chou S, Demchuk E, Tie Y, Ruiz P, Mumtaz M,Wheeler J; drtox@earthlink.netAgency <strong>for</strong> Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)ATSDR APPORACHES FOR INCREASING TRANSPARENCY, SPEEDAND STAKE-HOLDER INVOLVEMENT IN CHEMICAL RISK ASSESS-MENTSThe science of risk assessment is a rapidly evolving field which is expandingto include a number of both technical and social considerations in order to reach99
- Page 4 and 5:
Ballroom C1Monday10:30 AM-NoonM2-A
- Page 9 and 10:
US Environmental Protection Agency
- Page 11 and 12:
Workshops - Sunday, December 4Full
- Page 13 and 14:
WK9: Eliciting Judgments to Inform
- Page 15 and 16:
These freely available tools apply
- Page 17 and 18:
Plenary SessionsAll Plenary Session
- Page 19 and 20:
10:30 AM-NoonRoom 8/9M2-F Panel Dis
- Page 21 and 22:
1:30-3:00 PMRoom 8/9M3-F Symposium:
- Page 23 and 24:
4:50 pm M4-E.5Modeling of landscape
- Page 25 and 26:
P.35 Health risk assessment of meta
- Page 27 and 28:
Works-In-ProgressP.99 Assessing the
- Page 29 and 30:
10:30 AM-NoonRoom 8/9T2-F Error in
- Page 31 and 32:
1:30-3:00 PMRoom 8/9T3-F AppliedMet
- Page 34 and 35:
8:30-10:00 AMBallroom C1W1-A Sympos
- Page 36 and 37:
10:30 AM-NoonBallroom C1W2-A Commun
- Page 38:
1:30-3:00 PMBallroom C1W3-A Communi
- Page 41 and 42:
3:30-4:30 PMRoom 8/9W4-F Environmen
- Page 43 and 44:
oth recent advances, and ongoing ch
- Page 45 and 46:
M3-H Symposium: Analyzing and Manag
- Page 47 and 48:
Part 2, we consider the use of expe
- Page 49 and 50: T4-E Symposium: Food Safety Risk Pr
- Page 51 and 52: While integral to guiding the devel
- Page 53 and 54: have contributed to past difficulti
- Page 55 and 56: M2-C.1 Abraham IM, Henry S; abraham
- Page 58 and 59: serious accident of the Tokyo Elect
- Page 60 and 61: een found that independence assumpt
- Page 62 and 63: W4-I.1 Beach RH, McCarl BA, Ohrel S
- Page 64 and 65: M4-A.1 Berube DM; dmberube@ncsu.edu
- Page 66 and 67: W4-A.1 Boerner FU, Jardine C, Dried
- Page 69 and 70: M2-G.1 Brink SA, Davidson RA; rdavi
- Page 71 and 72: M4-H.5 Buede DM, Ezell BC, Guikema
- Page 73 and 74: same scientists’ environmental he
- Page 75 and 76: periods of time. Successful adaptat
- Page 77 and 78: P.123 Charnley G, Melnikov F, Beck
- Page 79 and 80: derived from mouse and rat testes t
- Page 81 and 82: esources under any circumstance in
- Page 83 and 84: W4-B.3 Convertino M, Collier ZA, Va
- Page 85 and 86: addition, over 10% thought that eve
- Page 87 and 88: Reference Dose (RfD). The average e
- Page 89 and 90: W2-H.2 Demuth JL, Morss RE, Morrow
- Page 91 and 92: T4-H.4 Dingus CA, McMillan NJ, Born
- Page 93 and 94: methods research priorities and pot
- Page 95 and 96: W3-A.2 Eggers SL, Thorne SL, Sousa
- Page 97 and 98: tions) were < 1 for sub-populations
- Page 99: sociated with model error. Second,
- Page 103 and 104: Fukushima nuclear accident coverage
- Page 105 and 106: for growth inhibitor use and retail
- Page 107 and 108: W1-C.1 Goble R, Hattis D; rgoble@cl
- Page 109 and 110: stakeholders. The utility of this m
- Page 111 and 112: T2-E.4 Guidotti TL; tee.guidotti@gm
- Page 113 and 114: M4-C.2 Haines DA, Murray JL, Donald
- Page 115 and 116: providing normative information of
- Page 117 and 118: then allow both systems to operate
- Page 119 and 120: tious disease outbreaks. Several cl
- Page 121 and 122: P.122 Hosseinali Mirza V, de Marcel
- Page 123 and 124: W2-B.1 Isukapalli SS, Brinkerhoff C
- Page 125 and 126: M3-G.3 Jardine CG, Driedger SM, Fur
- Page 127 and 128: P.88 Johnson BB, Cuite C, Hallman W
- Page 129 and 130: metrics to provide risk management
- Page 131 and 132: M4-C.1 Koch HM, Angerer J; koch@ipa
- Page 133 and 134: certainty factors) and comparative
- Page 135 and 136: T3-D.4 LaRocca S, Guikema SD, Cole
- Page 137 and 138: P.71 Lemus-Martinez C, Lemyre L, Pi
- Page 139 and 140: of excretion, and the increased che
- Page 141 and 142: M2-D.4 MacKenzie CA, Barker K; cmac
- Page 143 and 144: isk appetite and optimal risk mitig
- Page 145 and 146: ameters, and enabled a more robust
- Page 147 and 148: over the nature and format of infor
- Page 149 and 150: Analysis (PRA). Existing parametric
- Page 151 and 152:
explosion of a bomb in a building,
- Page 153 and 154:
T3-G.3 Nascarella MA; mnascarella@g
- Page 155 and 156:
corresponding slowdown in container
- Page 157 and 158:
ing the scope and usage of the cybe
- Page 159 and 160:
dose for a variety of exposure scen
- Page 161 and 162:
“nanofibers”) is relatively und
- Page 163 and 164:
ment (CEA), which provides both a f
- Page 165 and 166:
T3-D.2 Resurreccion JZ, Santos JR;
- Page 167 and 168:
shore wind turbines have yet been b
- Page 169 and 170:
T2-D.3 Rypinski AD, Cantral R; Arth
- Page 171 and 172:
time and temperature, determining t
- Page 173 and 174:
esponse to requests from the EC, th
- Page 175 and 176:
ers and inspectors. Analysis examin
- Page 177 and 178:
smoked salmon, and associated expos
- Page 179 and 180:
and 95th percentiles). Increasing t
- Page 181 and 182:
esponse relationship for B. anthrac
- Page 183 and 184:
variation on Day 0. Results showed
- Page 185 and 186:
sidered. The most significant resul
- Page 187 and 188:
lived in a apartment (not including
- Page 189 and 190:
W3-C.4 von Stackelberg KE; kvon@eri
- Page 191 and 192:
P.12 Waller RR, Dinis MF; rw@protec
- Page 193 and 194:
W2-B.6 Wang D, Collier Z, Mitchell-
- Page 195 and 196:
iomonitoring “equivalent” level
- Page 197 and 198:
T4-H.2 Winkel D, Good K, VonNiederh
- Page 199 and 200:
mation insufficiency, risk percepti
- Page 201 and 202:
choices. This work examines these s
- Page 203 and 204:
sults and possible intended or unin
- Page 205 and 206:
AAbadin HG.................... 36,
- Page 207 and 208:
Gray GM............................
- Page 209 and 210:
Peters E...........................
- Page 211 and 212:
SECOND FLOOR Floor MapConvention Ce