any point in the food chain. The five modules are animal exposure, animal pharmacokinetics,processing, human consumption, and comparison values. The first modulewill calculate total chemical doses from multiple exposure pathways <strong>for</strong> cattle, swine,and poultry. The animal pharmacokinetics module estimates the chemical distributionamong the animals’ edible tissues, based on the dose received and the physicaland metabolic characteristics of the chemical. Tissue concentrations and commonproduction practices are used by the processing module to predict contaminantconcentrations in various retail products. The module can also incorporate in-plantcontamination or data from residue testing of products. The human consumptionmodule uses NHANES data to estimate human exposure from contaminated product.<strong>Final</strong>ly, the exposure is compared to available reference doses or other regulatoryand public health exposure limits. The modules are being developed simultaneouslyby USDA scientists, some in cooperation with external partners, and are connectedand integrated within a novel risk evaluation framework. This model is flexible, allowing<strong>for</strong> either a full, farm-to-<strong>for</strong>k analysis, or a streamlined analysis, using onlythe relevant modules, if contamination is detected during processing. These modelshave wide application, from a strategic tiered approach, to evaluating a wide array ofchemical residues, to guiding laboratory detection and risk management decisionsduring chemical incidents.M3-C.2 Donadue D; woodley.dd@gmail.comUniversity of MaineLET THE DATA SPEAK: EXTRAPOLATING INFORMATION FORBIOTHREATSAs the US Army Public Health Command (USAPHC) establishes BiologicalMilitary Exposure Guidelines (BMEGs) many different types of data are examined,notably scientific data <strong>for</strong> predicting dose-response relationships <strong>for</strong> adverse healtheffects in humans. Typically biological agent data are sparse and extrapolation fromthose animal data is fraught with both variability and uncertainty. Published data setson pneumonic tularemia were of particular interest to USAPHC due to rich, but confounded,datasets <strong>for</strong> diverse primates including human volunteers. These datasetswere studied using neural networks and other statistical modeling techniques. Datawere examined using statistical techniques to provide some guidance on the uncertaintybounds <strong>for</strong> estimates when developing interspecies scaling <strong>for</strong> dose-responsemodels. As expected, uncertainty and variability are overwhelming in these models,and mechanistic knowledge <strong>for</strong> biologically-based scaling is fragmentary. The in<strong>for</strong>mationgleaned from this study will in<strong>for</strong>m the USAPHC as BMEGs are establishedand updated and high priority research needs are identified <strong>for</strong> reducing uncertaintyin predictions <strong>for</strong> likelihood and severity of illness in humans.90P.19 Dopchiz LP, Martin P, Michieli JL, Demichelis SO; sandrademichelis@yahoo.comUniversity John F. Kennedy of Argentina, National University of La PlataANALYSIS OF COASTAL POLLUTION: LOOKING FOR WATER QUAL-ITY INDEX WHICH CORRELATES PHYSICOCHEMICAL PARAM-ETERS AND BIOMARKERS IN NATIVE AQUATIC PLANTS USED ASSENTINELSThe goal of the present project is to characterize the coastal pollution and itspossible effect on the biota along a thousand km of coast from navigable rivers DelPlata Basin in the second from the continent It receives effluents from 128.718.445inhabitants. Their waters arrive at the sea through Río de la Plata river The goal ofthe present project is to characterize the coastal pollution and its possible effect on thebiota along a thousand km of coast from navigable rivers. In this sense surface water,sediments and vegetation samples from several localities were analyzed. Echinodorusuruguayensis Arechav. (Alismataceae), Eichornia crasipes (Mart.) Solms (Pontederiaceae),Pistia statiotes L. (Araceae), Scirpus giganteus Kunth (Cyperaceae) were usedand some biomarkers were considered. Chromosome count, characterization as wellas Mitotic Index were analyzed. Pistia statiotes showed 2n= 28; the Mitotic Indexcalculated as (IM= nro total of cells in divivsión x 100/nro total of observed cells) remainunder (MI= 1) and abnormalities were not recorded. The chromosomal countsin Eichornia crassipes was 2n=32 whereas in Scirpus giganteus Kunth (Cyperaceae)2n ca.= 28 without any previous publication. The IM in both cases were very under(IM ca.=1). Abnormalities in the studied localities of both species were not registeredeither. Nevertheless, Echinodorus uruguayensis, with 2n= 22 in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>for</strong> the firsttime, presented an outstanding rank of anomalies in the analyzed locality (anaphasesdiagonals, prophases disorganized, metaphases disorganized, c metaphases). The occurrenceof spontaneous clastogenic and aneugenic effects in species of some localitiescontrasts with the absence of them in others areas. Other cytogenetic biomarkersare under study. This in<strong>for</strong>mation compared with physicochemical characterizationof water were included in multivariate analysis in order to adequate water quality indexesto Del Plata basin and estimate risk associated to human activitiesP.65 Dourson ML, Haber LT, Maier A, Reichard J, Abraham IM; Dourson@tera.orgTERAUSE OF GENOMICS DATA AND OTHER EARLY EFFECT BIOMARK-ERS IN RISK ASSESSMENT: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGESSignificant research is ongoing developing and validating high- and mediumthroughputmethods as an enhancement of traditional toxicology testing. This burgeoningef<strong>for</strong>t suggests the need <strong>for</strong> equivalent ef<strong>for</strong>t to develop risk assessmentmethods <strong>for</strong> the meaningful application of such data. This project outlines key risk
methods research priorities and potential areas of new development. The new methodsin molecular toxicology have substantial potential to aid in risk assessment, bothin hazard characterization and dose-response assessment. Near-term applicationsinclude identification of target organs and target biological pathways, and aiding inmode of action determination, first as part of hypothesis generation, and then, inmore detailed analyses, as part of hypothesis testing. The use of such data in hazardcharacterization will require new interfaces between decision science and risk assessmenttools to <strong>for</strong>malize value of in<strong>for</strong>mation and weight of evidence decisions. Datafrom new molecular toxicology assays will also enhance dose-response assessmentby decreasing the need <strong>for</strong> extrapolation to doses well below the data, and offers thepotential <strong>for</strong> testing in cells from the species of interest. Key challenges in such applicationsinclude the need to “anchor” the results of in vitro testing by comparingresults with those from classical toxicity tests, and determining how to identify whatan adverse change is, and where homeostasis is disrupted sufficiently to result in anadverse effect. A hierarchical suite of approaches <strong>for</strong> addressing these issues from thebiological perspective and <strong>for</strong> using modeling approaches (e.g., linked exposure-effectmodeling) is presented.T3-H.1 Dreiding RA, McLay LA; lamclay@vcu.eduVirginia Commonwealth UniversitySCREENING CARGO CONTAINERS FOR NUCLEAR MATERIAL US-ING A LAYERED, RISK-BASED SCREENING SYSTEMInterdicting nuclear weapons is an issue of vital national interest. In this talk,we focus on interdicting nuclear weapons on cargo containers using port securityscreening methods, where the nuclear weapons would presumably be used to attacka target within the United States. We provide a model that simultaneously identifiesoptimal primary and secondary screening policies in a risk-based paradigm, where incomingcargo containers are classified according to their perceived risk. The proposedoptimization model determines how to utilize primary and secondary screening resourcesin a risk-based cargo container screening paradigm given a screening budget,prescreening classifications, and different device costs. We examine the structuralproperties of the model in order to shed light on the optimal screening policies. Themodel is illustrated with a computational example. Sensitivity analysis is per<strong>for</strong>medon the ability of the prescreening in correctly identifying risk and secondary screeningcosts. Results reveal that there are fewer practical differences between the screeningpolicies of the risk groups when prescreening is inaccurate. A comparison betweencurrent and hypothesized next-generation screening devices suggests that improvedscreening technologies will not substantially improve nuclear detection capabilities ofthe resulting system.M3-G.1 Driedger SM, Cooper EJ, Jardine CJ, Furgal C; michelle_driedger@umanitoba.caUniversity of ManitobaFINDING A VOICE FOR THE METIS: RISK COMMUNICATION ANDTRUST DURING THE MANAGEMENT OF PANDEMIC H1N1While many Canadian cases of confirmed H1N1 were characterized as mild,Indigenous communities located in the more remote areas of Northern Manitobawere hit with more severe outcomes of the outbreak, particularly in the first Wave ofits spread. The provision of health services to Indigenous peoples has always been acontentious issue in Canada. In Canada, of the three main groupings of Aboriginalpeoples, the Metis are frequently <strong>for</strong>gotten because they are not the primary “responsibility”of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada <strong>for</strong> the provision of health andother social services. One way that the Manitoba Metis Federation sought to ensurethat there was Metis relevant and appropriate risk communications messaging wasto be part of a tri-partite negotiation to ensure that Metis members knew how toprotect themselves from contracting H1N1. This presentation will examine throughfocus groups and individual key in<strong>for</strong>mant interviews how the Metis trusted (or not)the messaging that they received. Mixed gender focus groups were conducted withabout 265 Metis in different parts of Manitoba and Winnipeg between October andNovember 2010 with the following age categories: 18-34, 35-54, and 55+. Key in<strong>for</strong>mantinterviews have been conducted with federal, provincial, and regional key in<strong>for</strong>mantsthat have been involved in the management of pandemic H1N1 between Apriland July 2011. Overall, participants were skeptical of public health messaging aroundH1N1. While many could identify protective behavior strategies to avoid contractingH1N1 (e.g. handwashing, staying at home while sick, getting immunized, etc), fewdid not feel they had adequate in<strong>for</strong>mation about H1N1 to protect themselves andtheir family. Moreover, although the Manitoba Metis Federation made great ef<strong>for</strong>tsto provide tailored communications to its members, these ef<strong>for</strong>ts could not be recalledduring focus groups. The presentation will comment on what factors may haveimpeded the communications strategies of public health officials and the ManitobaMetis Federation.T4-D.4 Duarte HO, Droguett EL, Araújo M, Teixeira SF, Silva RA; heitorod@gmail.comFederal University of Pernambuco (UFPE)A METHODOLOGY TO QUANTIFY ECOLOGICAL RISKS ORIGINAT-ING FROM INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS: APPLICATION IN A REFIN-ERY NEAR AN AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM IN BRAZILRecent industrial accidents such as toxic spills have caused catastrophic damageto ecological environments (plants and animals), so an effective method to assessecological risks has been demanded. Firstly, this work aims at proposing a methodol-91
- Page 4 and 5:
Ballroom C1Monday10:30 AM-NoonM2-A
- Page 9 and 10:
US Environmental Protection Agency
- Page 11 and 12:
Workshops - Sunday, December 4Full
- Page 13 and 14:
WK9: Eliciting Judgments to Inform
- Page 15 and 16:
These freely available tools apply
- Page 17 and 18:
Plenary SessionsAll Plenary Session
- Page 19 and 20:
10:30 AM-NoonRoom 8/9M2-F Panel Dis
- Page 21 and 22:
1:30-3:00 PMRoom 8/9M3-F Symposium:
- Page 23 and 24:
4:50 pm M4-E.5Modeling of landscape
- Page 25 and 26:
P.35 Health risk assessment of meta
- Page 27 and 28:
Works-In-ProgressP.99 Assessing the
- Page 29 and 30:
10:30 AM-NoonRoom 8/9T2-F Error in
- Page 31 and 32:
1:30-3:00 PMRoom 8/9T3-F AppliedMet
- Page 34 and 35:
8:30-10:00 AMBallroom C1W1-A Sympos
- Page 36 and 37:
10:30 AM-NoonBallroom C1W2-A Commun
- Page 38:
1:30-3:00 PMBallroom C1W3-A Communi
- Page 41 and 42: 3:30-4:30 PMRoom 8/9W4-F Environmen
- Page 43 and 44: oth recent advances, and ongoing ch
- Page 45 and 46: M3-H Symposium: Analyzing and Manag
- Page 47 and 48: Part 2, we consider the use of expe
- Page 49 and 50: T4-E Symposium: Food Safety Risk Pr
- Page 51 and 52: While integral to guiding the devel
- Page 53 and 54: have contributed to past difficulti
- Page 55 and 56: M2-C.1 Abraham IM, Henry S; abraham
- Page 58 and 59: serious accident of the Tokyo Elect
- Page 60 and 61: een found that independence assumpt
- Page 62 and 63: W4-I.1 Beach RH, McCarl BA, Ohrel S
- Page 64 and 65: M4-A.1 Berube DM; dmberube@ncsu.edu
- Page 66 and 67: W4-A.1 Boerner FU, Jardine C, Dried
- Page 69 and 70: M2-G.1 Brink SA, Davidson RA; rdavi
- Page 71 and 72: M4-H.5 Buede DM, Ezell BC, Guikema
- Page 73 and 74: same scientists’ environmental he
- Page 75 and 76: periods of time. Successful adaptat
- Page 77 and 78: P.123 Charnley G, Melnikov F, Beck
- Page 79 and 80: derived from mouse and rat testes t
- Page 81 and 82: esources under any circumstance in
- Page 83 and 84: W4-B.3 Convertino M, Collier ZA, Va
- Page 85 and 86: addition, over 10% thought that eve
- Page 87 and 88: Reference Dose (RfD). The average e
- Page 89 and 90: W2-H.2 Demuth JL, Morss RE, Morrow
- Page 91: T4-H.4 Dingus CA, McMillan NJ, Born
- Page 95 and 96: W3-A.2 Eggers SL, Thorne SL, Sousa
- Page 97 and 98: tions) were < 1 for sub-populations
- Page 99 and 100: sociated with model error. Second,
- Page 101 and 102: inter-donation interval to mitigate
- Page 103 and 104: Fukushima nuclear accident coverage
- Page 105 and 106: for growth inhibitor use and retail
- Page 107 and 108: W1-C.1 Goble R, Hattis D; rgoble@cl
- Page 109 and 110: stakeholders. The utility of this m
- Page 111 and 112: T2-E.4 Guidotti TL; tee.guidotti@gm
- Page 113 and 114: M4-C.2 Haines DA, Murray JL, Donald
- Page 115 and 116: providing normative information of
- Page 117 and 118: then allow both systems to operate
- Page 119 and 120: tious disease outbreaks. Several cl
- Page 121 and 122: P.122 Hosseinali Mirza V, de Marcel
- Page 123 and 124: W2-B.1 Isukapalli SS, Brinkerhoff C
- Page 125 and 126: M3-G.3 Jardine CG, Driedger SM, Fur
- Page 127 and 128: P.88 Johnson BB, Cuite C, Hallman W
- Page 129 and 130: metrics to provide risk management
- Page 131 and 132: M4-C.1 Koch HM, Angerer J; koch@ipa
- Page 133 and 134: certainty factors) and comparative
- Page 135 and 136: T3-D.4 LaRocca S, Guikema SD, Cole
- Page 137 and 138: P.71 Lemus-Martinez C, Lemyre L, Pi
- Page 139 and 140: of excretion, and the increased che
- Page 141 and 142: M2-D.4 MacKenzie CA, Barker K; cmac
- Page 143 and 144:
isk appetite and optimal risk mitig
- Page 145 and 146:
ameters, and enabled a more robust
- Page 147 and 148:
over the nature and format of infor
- Page 149 and 150:
Analysis (PRA). Existing parametric
- Page 151 and 152:
explosion of a bomb in a building,
- Page 153 and 154:
T3-G.3 Nascarella MA; mnascarella@g
- Page 155 and 156:
corresponding slowdown in container
- Page 157 and 158:
ing the scope and usage of the cybe
- Page 159 and 160:
dose for a variety of exposure scen
- Page 161 and 162:
“nanofibers”) is relatively und
- Page 163 and 164:
ment (CEA), which provides both a f
- Page 165 and 166:
T3-D.2 Resurreccion JZ, Santos JR;
- Page 167 and 168:
shore wind turbines have yet been b
- Page 169 and 170:
T2-D.3 Rypinski AD, Cantral R; Arth
- Page 171 and 172:
time and temperature, determining t
- Page 173 and 174:
esponse to requests from the EC, th
- Page 175 and 176:
ers and inspectors. Analysis examin
- Page 177 and 178:
smoked salmon, and associated expos
- Page 179 and 180:
and 95th percentiles). Increasing t
- Page 181 and 182:
esponse relationship for B. anthrac
- Page 183 and 184:
variation on Day 0. Results showed
- Page 185 and 186:
sidered. The most significant resul
- Page 187 and 188:
lived in a apartment (not including
- Page 189 and 190:
W3-C.4 von Stackelberg KE; kvon@eri
- Page 191 and 192:
P.12 Waller RR, Dinis MF; rw@protec
- Page 193 and 194:
W2-B.6 Wang D, Collier Z, Mitchell-
- Page 195 and 196:
iomonitoring “equivalent” level
- Page 197 and 198:
T4-H.2 Winkel D, Good K, VonNiederh
- Page 199 and 200:
mation insufficiency, risk percepti
- Page 201 and 202:
choices. This work examines these s
- Page 203 and 204:
sults and possible intended or unin
- Page 205 and 206:
AAbadin HG.................... 36,
- Page 207 and 208:
Gray GM............................
- Page 209 and 210:
Peters E...........................
- Page 211 and 212:
SECOND FLOOR Floor MapConvention Ce