3:30-4:30 PMBallroom C1W4-A Communicating<strong>Risk</strong>s, Health andWell-BeingChair: Amanda Boyd3:30 pm W4-A.1H1N1 - Credibility of traditionalhealth in<strong>for</strong>mation sources and Web2.0 in<strong>for</strong>mation in AlbertaBoerner FU, Jardine C, Driedger MUniversity of Alberta, University of Manitoba3:50 pm W4-A.2The influence of risk communication<strong>for</strong>mats on benefit perception ofmedical treatmentsKeller C, Siegrist METH Zurich4:10 pm W4-A.4Which pictorial warning labels oncigarette packaging work best? Experimentalevidence from smokersand youth in Mexico and the USThrasher JF, Hammond D, Reid J, DriezenP, Boudreau CUniversity of South Carolina383:30-5:00 PMBallroom C2W4-B <strong>Risk</strong> Assessmentof Pharmaceuticals in theEnvironmentChair: Matteo Conventino3:30 pm W4-B.1Pharmaceuticals in the environments:water occurrence assessmentConerly O, Hallberg G, Tomasik TUS Environmental Protection Agency, TheCadmus Group3:50 pm W4-B.2Pharmaceuticals in the environment:health effects screeningConerly O, Gebhart AM, Fitzpatrick S,Bloom RUS Environmental Protection Agency,Toxservices, US Food and Drug Administration4:10 pm W4-B.3Decision-driven risk assessment ofthe pharmaceutical supply chainConvertino M, Collier ZA, Valverde JL,Tourki Y, Barber M, Keisler JM, Linkov IUniversity of Florida, USACE ERDC,Ecole des Mines Nancy, MIT, Universityof Massachusetts Boston4:30 pm W4-B.4Comparability of toxicological evaluationframeworks <strong>for</strong> veterinary andhuman pharmaceuticals and environmentalchemicals <strong>for</strong> four federalprogramsNachman K, Fain K, Shah S, Fox MJohns Hopkins UniversityWednesday3:30-5:10 PMBallroom C3W4-C Symposium:Fulfilling the Potentialof EPA’s Integrated <strong>Risk</strong>In<strong>for</strong>mation System (IRIS)<strong>Program</strong>Chair: Becki Clark3:30 pm W4-C.1New initiatives <strong>for</strong> EPA’s Integrated <strong>Risk</strong>In<strong>for</strong>mation System (IRIS) programClark B, Kadry A M, Flowers L, CoglianoVUS Environmental Protection Agency3:50 pm W4-C.2ATSDR approaches <strong>for</strong> increasingtransparency, speed and stake-holderinvolvement in chemical risk assessmentsFowler BA, Abadin H, Chou S, DemchukE, Tie Y, Ruiz P, Mumtaz M, Wheeler JAgency <strong>for</strong> Toxic Substances and DiseaseRegistry (ATSDR)4:10 pm W4-C.3Corrective lenses <strong>for</strong> IRISSteinzor R, Shudtz MUniversity of Maryland School of Lawand the Center <strong>for</strong> Progressive Re<strong>for</strong>m4:30 pm W4-C.4Recommendations <strong>for</strong> Retooling IRISBecker RA, Moran E, Fensterheim R, PottengerLHAmerican Chemistry Council4:50 pm W4-C.5Natural Resources Defense Council(NRDC) perspective on transparency,speed and stakeholders’ involvementin EPA’s chemical risk assessmentSass JNatural Resources Defense Council(NRDC)3:30-5:00 PMRoom 6W4-D Reliability <strong>Analysis</strong>and Modeling <strong>for</strong>Infrastructure SystemsChair: Margaret MacDonell3:30 pm W4-D.1Quantifying the hurricane risk to offshorewind turbinesRose S, Jaramillo P, Small M, GrossmannI, Apt JCarnegie Mellon University3:50 pm W4-D.2Recent advances in probabilityboundstheory applied to aerospaceBalch MSApplied Biomathematics4:10 pm W4-D.3Advancing probabilistic risk analysisby enhanced treatment of commoncause failures: a mechanistic perspectiveMohaghegh ZM, Modarres MMUniversity of Maryland4:30 pm W4-D.4Quantifying the interdependence betweenbridge capacity and loadHwang S, Haimes YYUniversity of Virginia3:30-5:10 PMRoom 7W4-E Bio-<strong>Risk</strong>: Agricultureand BeyondChair: Mark Powell3:30 pm W4-E.1A systems approach to retrospectiveregulatory review: a case study of agriculturalregulation in WashingtonAbbott LC, Schaub JDUS Department of Agriculture3:50 pm W4-E.2Examining the potential futures ofplant targeted genetic modificationKokotovich AE, Kuzma JUniversity of Minnesota4:10 pm W4-E.3<strong>Risk</strong> assessment on animal welfareper<strong>for</strong>med at the European FoodSafety Authority in the EUSerratosa JS, Ribo OREuropean Food Safety Authority4:30 pm W4-E.4How do you model a “negligible”probability under the WTO Sanitaryand Phytosanitary Agreement?Powell MUS Department of Agriculture4:50 pm W4-E.5How to deal with gene-biohazard interaction?Eisinger FIPC
3:30-4:30 PMRoom 8/9W4-F Environmental <strong>Risk</strong>Management DecisionsSponsored by: DARSGChair: Robert Lee3:30 pm W4-F.1Natural resource damage assessment,risk assessment, and decision analysis:Why can’t we all be friends?Lee RC, Ryti R, Fitzgerald M, Black PNeptune and Company, Inc.3:50 pm W4-F.2Evaluation of different data sourcesused to populate environmental strategicrisk appraisal frameworkDagonneau JM, Prpich G, Rocks SA, PollardSJTCranfield University4:10 pm W4-F.3Reducing the uncertainty in waterquality assessment of corn versesswitchgrass ethanol productionBiksey T, Wu F, Kaltenbach MEHS Support, Inc., University of Pittsburgh,University of Notre Dame3:30-5:00 PMRoom 10W4-G Panel Discussion:SRA Specialty Groups:What’s MissingChair: Benjamin TrumpPanelists:Trump BD, Linkov I, Palma OJ, TokaiA, Bostrom ACarnegie Mellon University, US ArmyEngineer Research and Development Center,University of Lisbon, Portugal, Universityof Osaka, Japan, University ofWashingtonWednesday3:30-5:00 PMRoom 11W4-H <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong>Approaches <strong>for</strong>Cybersecurity and CriticalInfrastructureSponsored by: SDSGChair: Thad Odderstol3:30 pm W4-H.1Identifying and managing nationallevelcybersecurity riskOdderstol TWDepartment of Homeland Security, NationalCyber Security Division3:50 pm W4-H.2Cyber-security risk assessment: challengesand solutionsPanjwani S, Baecher GUniversity of Maryland4:10 pm W4-H.3Towards more risk- and per<strong>for</strong>mance-basedUS government standards<strong>for</strong> protecting buildings fromvehicle bomb attacksHeatwole NT, Florig HKUniversity of Southern Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, Universityof Florida, Carnegie Mellon University4:30 pm W4-H.4Game theoretical risk managementSnekkenes EGjovik University College, Norway3:30-5:10 PMRoom 12/13W4-I Symposium:Quantifying andCommunicating the USDomestic Benefits of GHGEmissions ReductionsChair: Marus Sarofim3:30 pm W4-I.1Modeling US agricultural responseunder climate changeBeach RH, McCarl BA, Ohrel SB,DeAngelo BJ, Ross MTRTI International3:50 pm W4-I.2Quantifying and communicatingbenefits and risks of GHG emissionscenariosDeAngelo BJ, Gilmore EA, Sarofim MC,Waldhoff ST, Martinich J, Cardamone K,Ohrel S, Ragnauth S, Birnbaum RUS Environmental Protection Agency4:10 pm W4-I.3Quantifying and valuing climatechange impacts on coral reefs in theUSMartinich J, Lane D, Buddemeier R, ReadyR, Cardamone K, Carney KUS Environmental Protection Agency4:30 pm W4-I.4The impact of climate change onmortality risk and impacts attributableto extreme heat and cold in majorU.S. metropolitan areasMills D, Deck LStratus Consulting Inc.4:50 pm W4-I.5Assessing the economic impact ofclimate change induced sea level riseand storm surge in the USNeumann JE, Martinich J, Hudgens D,Emanuel K, Ravela S, Kirshen P, BosmaK, Ludwig L, Herter JIndustrial Economics, Incorporated; ClimateChange Division, USEPA, Wind<strong>Risk</strong>-Tech, Battelle Memorial Institute, WoodsHole Group, Independent Consultant39
- Page 4 and 5: Ballroom C1Monday10:30 AM-NoonM2-A
- Page 9 and 10: US Environmental Protection Agency
- Page 11 and 12: Workshops - Sunday, December 4Full
- Page 13 and 14: WK9: Eliciting Judgments to Inform
- Page 15 and 16: These freely available tools apply
- Page 17 and 18: Plenary SessionsAll Plenary Session
- Page 19 and 20: 10:30 AM-NoonRoom 8/9M2-F Panel Dis
- Page 21 and 22: 1:30-3:00 PMRoom 8/9M3-F Symposium:
- Page 23 and 24: 4:50 pm M4-E.5Modeling of landscape
- Page 25 and 26: P.35 Health risk assessment of meta
- Page 27 and 28: Works-In-ProgressP.99 Assessing the
- Page 29 and 30: 10:30 AM-NoonRoom 8/9T2-F Error in
- Page 31 and 32: 1:30-3:00 PMRoom 8/9T3-F AppliedMet
- Page 34 and 35: 8:30-10:00 AMBallroom C1W1-A Sympos
- Page 36 and 37: 10:30 AM-NoonBallroom C1W2-A Commun
- Page 38: 1:30-3:00 PMBallroom C1W3-A Communi
- Page 43 and 44: oth recent advances, and ongoing ch
- Page 45 and 46: M3-H Symposium: Analyzing and Manag
- Page 47 and 48: Part 2, we consider the use of expe
- Page 49 and 50: T4-E Symposium: Food Safety Risk Pr
- Page 51 and 52: While integral to guiding the devel
- Page 53 and 54: have contributed to past difficulti
- Page 55 and 56: M2-C.1 Abraham IM, Henry S; abraham
- Page 58 and 59: serious accident of the Tokyo Elect
- Page 60 and 61: een found that independence assumpt
- Page 62 and 63: W4-I.1 Beach RH, McCarl BA, Ohrel S
- Page 64 and 65: M4-A.1 Berube DM; dmberube@ncsu.edu
- Page 66 and 67: W4-A.1 Boerner FU, Jardine C, Dried
- Page 69 and 70: M2-G.1 Brink SA, Davidson RA; rdavi
- Page 71 and 72: M4-H.5 Buede DM, Ezell BC, Guikema
- Page 73 and 74: same scientists’ environmental he
- Page 75 and 76: periods of time. Successful adaptat
- Page 77 and 78: P.123 Charnley G, Melnikov F, Beck
- Page 79 and 80: derived from mouse and rat testes t
- Page 81 and 82: esources under any circumstance in
- Page 83 and 84: W4-B.3 Convertino M, Collier ZA, Va
- Page 85 and 86: addition, over 10% thought that eve
- Page 87 and 88: Reference Dose (RfD). The average e
- Page 89 and 90:
W2-H.2 Demuth JL, Morss RE, Morrow
- Page 91 and 92:
T4-H.4 Dingus CA, McMillan NJ, Born
- Page 93 and 94:
methods research priorities and pot
- Page 95 and 96:
W3-A.2 Eggers SL, Thorne SL, Sousa
- Page 97 and 98:
tions) were < 1 for sub-populations
- Page 99 and 100:
sociated with model error. Second,
- Page 101 and 102:
inter-donation interval to mitigate
- Page 103 and 104:
Fukushima nuclear accident coverage
- Page 105 and 106:
for growth inhibitor use and retail
- Page 107 and 108:
W1-C.1 Goble R, Hattis D; rgoble@cl
- Page 109 and 110:
stakeholders. The utility of this m
- Page 111 and 112:
T2-E.4 Guidotti TL; tee.guidotti@gm
- Page 113 and 114:
M4-C.2 Haines DA, Murray JL, Donald
- Page 115 and 116:
providing normative information of
- Page 117 and 118:
then allow both systems to operate
- Page 119 and 120:
tious disease outbreaks. Several cl
- Page 121 and 122:
P.122 Hosseinali Mirza V, de Marcel
- Page 123 and 124:
W2-B.1 Isukapalli SS, Brinkerhoff C
- Page 125 and 126:
M3-G.3 Jardine CG, Driedger SM, Fur
- Page 127 and 128:
P.88 Johnson BB, Cuite C, Hallman W
- Page 129 and 130:
metrics to provide risk management
- Page 131 and 132:
M4-C.1 Koch HM, Angerer J; koch@ipa
- Page 133 and 134:
certainty factors) and comparative
- Page 135 and 136:
T3-D.4 LaRocca S, Guikema SD, Cole
- Page 137 and 138:
P.71 Lemus-Martinez C, Lemyre L, Pi
- Page 139 and 140:
of excretion, and the increased che
- Page 141 and 142:
M2-D.4 MacKenzie CA, Barker K; cmac
- Page 143 and 144:
isk appetite and optimal risk mitig
- Page 145 and 146:
ameters, and enabled a more robust
- Page 147 and 148:
over the nature and format of infor
- Page 149 and 150:
Analysis (PRA). Existing parametric
- Page 151 and 152:
explosion of a bomb in a building,
- Page 153 and 154:
T3-G.3 Nascarella MA; mnascarella@g
- Page 155 and 156:
corresponding slowdown in container
- Page 157 and 158:
ing the scope and usage of the cybe
- Page 159 and 160:
dose for a variety of exposure scen
- Page 161 and 162:
“nanofibers”) is relatively und
- Page 163 and 164:
ment (CEA), which provides both a f
- Page 165 and 166:
T3-D.2 Resurreccion JZ, Santos JR;
- Page 167 and 168:
shore wind turbines have yet been b
- Page 169 and 170:
T2-D.3 Rypinski AD, Cantral R; Arth
- Page 171 and 172:
time and temperature, determining t
- Page 173 and 174:
esponse to requests from the EC, th
- Page 175 and 176:
ers and inspectors. Analysis examin
- Page 177 and 178:
smoked salmon, and associated expos
- Page 179 and 180:
and 95th percentiles). Increasing t
- Page 181 and 182:
esponse relationship for B. anthrac
- Page 183 and 184:
variation on Day 0. Results showed
- Page 185 and 186:
sidered. The most significant resul
- Page 187 and 188:
lived in a apartment (not including
- Page 189 and 190:
W3-C.4 von Stackelberg KE; kvon@eri
- Page 191 and 192:
P.12 Waller RR, Dinis MF; rw@protec
- Page 193 and 194:
W2-B.6 Wang D, Collier Z, Mitchell-
- Page 195 and 196:
iomonitoring “equivalent” level
- Page 197 and 198:
T4-H.2 Winkel D, Good K, VonNiederh
- Page 199 and 200:
mation insufficiency, risk percepti
- Page 201 and 202:
choices. This work examines these s
- Page 203 and 204:
sults and possible intended or unin
- Page 205 and 206:
AAbadin HG.................... 36,
- Page 207 and 208:
Gray GM............................
- Page 209 and 210:
Peters E...........................
- Page 211 and 212:
SECOND FLOOR Floor MapConvention Ce