6:15 - 8:15 PMP Poster SessionBallroom ABEBASGP.1 Seeing the <strong>for</strong>est through thetrees: NRD and dynamic ecosystemsCantor RA, Menzie CA, Deardorff TL,Hulme-Lowe CK, Wickwire WTExponentDecision <strong>Analysis</strong> & <strong>Risk</strong>P.2 Quantitative risk model <strong>for</strong>foodborne pathogens in herbs andspicesFedoruk A, Davidson VJ, Fazil AUniversity of Guelph, Public Health Agencyof Canada<strong>Risk</strong>, Policy and LawP.3 China’s newly promulgatedregulation on the environmentalmanagement of new chemical substancesCragin DW, Silverman KCMerck & Co.Biological StressorsP.4 Comparing and prioritizingpathogen risksJoe AL, Gurian PL, Olson MS, Teng J,Marquez EB, Kumar A, Pepper I, GerbaCP, Galada HCDrexel UniversityP.5 Increasing the temperature ofhigh temperature, short time pasteurizationmay increase the risk oflisteriosis from consumption of pasteurizedfluid milk.Stasiewicz M, Martin N, Laue S, WiedmannMCornell University22P.6 Identifiability of bioaerosolsize fraction from environmentalsamplingHong T, Gurian PLDrexel UniversityNanomaterials: OccupationalExposure LimitsP.7 Proposal <strong>for</strong> an occupationalexposure limit of carbon nanotubesbased on their risk evaluationNakanishi J, Gamo M, Ema M, Ogura I,Kobayashi NAdvanced Industrial Science and Technology(AIST)P.8 <strong>Risk</strong> assessment of nanomaterials- fullerene C60Shinohara N, Gamo M, Nakanishi JNational Institute of Advanced IndustrialScience and TechnologyP.9 <strong>Risk</strong> assessment of nanomaterials- titanium dioxide (TiO 2)Gamo M, Ogura I, Kobayashi N, Ema M,Nakanishi JNational Institute of Advanced IndustrialScience and Technology (AIST)P.11 Quantifying the interdependenteffects of supply chain disruptionsand mitigation strategiesMacKenzie CA, Barker KUniversity of OklahomaP.12 International symposium oncultural property risk analysis: reporton an SRA sponsored eventWaller RR, Dinis MFProtect Heritage Corp., Faculdade de Ciênciase Tecnologia da Universidade Nova deLisboaMondaySecurity & DefenseP.13 Extending methods of vulnerabilityanalysis to address resilienceand robustnessTas S, Bier VMUniversity of Wisconsin at MadisonP.14 Subsidizing to disrupt a terrorismsupply chain - a four-player gameShan X, Zhuang JUniversity at Buffalo, The State Universityof New YorkP.15 The chemical terrorism risk assessmentCox J, McGarvey D, Whitmire M,Hawkins B, Montello B, Shroy BDHS Chemical Security <strong>Analysis</strong> Center(CSAC), Battelle Memorial InstituteP.16 <strong>Risk</strong> screening assessmentsat Los Alamos National Laboratory(Part 1. Human Health)Fristachi A, Mirenda REnvironmental <strong>Risk</strong> Resources, Los AlamosNational LaboratoryP.17 Ensuring consistency in riskanalysis event trees and consequencesStreetman SSData Architecture Solutions, Inc., DHSP.18 ITRA sensitivity study: subwayevent response analysisMcMillan NJ, Tollar E, Wightman J,Huckett JBattelleEcological <strong>Risk</strong>P.19 <strong>Analysis</strong> of coastal pollution:looking <strong>for</strong> water quality index whichcorrelates physicochemical parametersand biomarkers in native aquaticplants used as sentinels.Dopchiz LP, Martin P, Michieli JL, DemichelisSOUniversity John F. Kennedy of Argentina,National University of La PlataP.20 Integral plan of management<strong>for</strong> chemical emergencies in Lanús-ArgentinaLopez CR, Demichelis SONational University of LanusP.21 Population risks in a smallcoastal town of the Rio de la Platariver: a case of studyMedrano D, Demichelis SONational University of LanusP.22 Landslide risk assessment infundamental roads of Bolivia usingmulti-criteria and Geographic In<strong>for</strong>mationSystems analysisLedezma FFLWater and Sanitation CentreP.23 <strong>Analysis</strong> of changes in densityof distribution of air temperatureover last decades using quantileregression method and radiosondemeasurementsTimofeev AA, Sterin AMRIHMI-WDCP.24 Preliminary assessment of thecarbon footprint in the chemical industryin the field of basic chemistryVillarraga Farfán EJUniversidad de los AndesP.25 Meteorological risks reductionin <strong>for</strong>ecasting convective events fromsatellite dataAgurenko AO, Korshunov AARIHMI-WDCP.27 Evaluation of <strong>for</strong>maldehydeair emissions from a washing machineand potential human exposureMcCready D, Arnold S, Fontaine DThe Dow Chemical CompanyP.28 Update to the U.S. EPA’s guidelines<strong>for</strong> (human) exposure assessmentand monitoringTulve NS, Olsen M, Broder MUS Environmental Protection AgencyP.29 An in vitro to in vivo extrapolationapproach <strong>for</strong> conducting a cumulativerisk assessment <strong>for</strong> phthalateestersChoi K, Campbell J, Clewell HThe Hamner Insitutes <strong>for</strong> Health SciencesP.30 Exposure assessment <strong>for</strong> ambienthexavalent chromium (Cr(VI))in Japanese industrial areaOno K, Toyoda T, Shimada S, Nezu TNational Institute of Advanced IndustrialScience and TechnologyP.31 Blood mercury concentrationand fish consumption: risk and perceptionsof risk among urban andcoastal mother in TaiwanJiang CB, Chien LC, Han BC, Hsu CSTMUP.32 Mouthing frequency of childrenunder 2 years old in TaiwanTsou MC, Chien LC, Özkaynak H,Beamer P, Dang WTMUP.33 Exposure assessment of metalconcentration and relevant factors onwomen reproductivity abilityLei HL, Chien LC, Liao KW, Yeh CYTaipei Medical UniversityP.34 A study on alternative risk assessmentscheme of frame retardantsKotani K, Managaki S, Masunaga SYokohama National University
P.35 Health risk assessment of metaltoxicity from the consumption offish from different water layers: applicationof mixture risk assessmentmethodHsu HT, Ling MP, Wu CC, Yang KRChina Medical UniversityP.36 Substance flow-based exposureassessment <strong>for</strong> HBCD from alife-cycle perspective in JapanManagaki S, Kotani K, Hondo H, KobayashiT, Miyake A, Masunaga SYokohama National UniversityP.37 Conducting uncertainty andsensitivity analyses in radiological riskassessment with the probabilistic databaseofSYMBIOSESimon-Cornu M, Beaugelin-Seiller K,Calmon P, Mourlon C, Nicoulaud V,Garcia-Sanchez L, Gonze MAInstitut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire(IRSN), DEI, Cadarache, FranceP.38 Young kids potentially at greatestrisk due to exposures to perfluorinatedcompounds through waterconsumptionDalaijamts C, Wu KYInstitute of Occupational Medicine and IndustrialHygiene, College of Public Health,National Taiwan UniversityP.39 Identifying and evaluatingdrinking water contaminants ofemerging concern: a state perspectiveGreene CW, Goeden HM, Dady JM, RossM, Shubat PJMinnesota Department of HealthP.40 European solvents industrygroup consumer generic exposurescenario toolZaleski R, Qian H, Zelenka M, George-Ares A, Money CExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc;ExxonMobil Petroleum and ChemicalP.41 Quantitative model evaluation:lessons learned from symposia ongetting the numbers rightvon Stackelberg KE, Williams PRDE <strong>Risk</strong> Sciences, LLPP.42 Gene-environment interactionsin exposure-response betweenorganophosphate pesticide exposuresand the phenotypic anchor of acetylcholinesteraseinhibition in farmworkersGriffith WC, Guerrette ZN, Moreira EG,Thompson B, Coronado GD, VigorenEM, Faustman EMUniversity of Washington, Fred HutchinsonCancer Research Center, State Universityof LondrinaP.43 Proposition 65 dermal exposureassessment <strong>for</strong> DEHP in clothingwith plasticized imagesWilliams E, Keenan J, Le M, Gaffney SChem<strong>Risk</strong> LLCP.44 Understanding the temporalpatterns of aerosols at Hsin-Chuangin Taipei by dynamic factor analysisYu HL, Lin YCNational Taiwan UniversityP.45 Too big or not too big? That isthe systemic risk question!Pai PKThe University Texas of the Permian BasinP.46 Contaminant dispersion modelingin complex urban landscapesusing hybrid computational fluid dynamicstechniquesMazumdar S, Isukapalli SUMDNJ-RW Johnson Medical Schooland Rutgers UniversityMondayP.47 Ultrafine particles in combustionsource emissions: the role ofwaste-to-energy facilitiesFoster SA, Chrostowski PC, Porter TJCPF Associates, Inc. and WheelabratorEnvironmental Technologies, Inc.P.48 CAREX Canada: Using riskbasedindicators in support of prioritizingactions to reduce or eliminateexposures to known and suspectedcarcinogens in the environmentSetton E, Hystad P, Poplawski K, CheasleyR, Cervantes A, Nicol AM, Demers PUniversity of Victoria, University of BritishColumbia, Cancer Care OntarioP.49 Para-occupational exposureto pesticides in agricultural families:amissed opportunity <strong>for</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> AssessmentBlewett C, Mckenzie A, Nicol A-MUniversity of British ColumbiaP.50 Use of random <strong>for</strong>est <strong>for</strong> estimationof significant exposures incase control studies of foodbornediseasesGu W, Cole D, Hoekstra MFederal GovernmentP.51 An Exposure Index estimationframework <strong>for</strong> the National Children’sStudy (NCS)Georgopoulos PG, Brinkerhoff CJ, IsukapalliSS, Lioy P, Dellarco M, Landrigan PEnvironmental & Occupational HealthSciences InstituteDRSGP.52 A unified system biology dataintegration by using a modified JDLframeworkMohapatra AKHealth Canada Alberta RegionP.53 Development of a humanPBPK model <strong>for</strong> carbaryl using anin vitro to in vivo extrapolation approachand its application in reversedosimetryYoon M, Yang Y, Tan Y-M, Clewell HJThe Hamner Institutes <strong>for</strong> Health SciencesP.54 An analysis of the growthcurves of control Sprague-Dawleyrats fed ad-libitum from weaning to90 days of ageWalker JT, Walker TD, Walker OAUS Environmental Protection AgencyP.55 A mathematical description ofNational Toxicology <strong>Program</strong> (NTP)2-year growth curves of male and femaleF344/N ratsWalker JT, Walker TD, Walker OAUS Environmental Protection AgencyP.56 Air pollution, abnormal birthweight and obesity may increase therisk of developing asthma duringadolescenceTsai MS, Pan SC, Lin MH, Ho WC,Chen PC, Lin RSChina Medical UniversityP.58 A proposed framework <strong>for</strong>evaluating alternative temporal patternsof exposure <strong>for</strong> risk characterizationParker AL, Maier A, Haber LT, SweeneyLMToxicology Excellence <strong>for</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> Assessment(TERA)P.59 Shipwrecked: finding the liferaft of knowledge <strong>for</strong> risk assessmentNance P, Haber L, Maier A, Patterson JToxicology Excellence <strong>for</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> AssessmentP.60 Use of physiologically-basedpharmacokinetic models to assesswhether epidemiologic associationsare due to reverse causalityLoccisano AE, Longnecker MP, CampbellJL, Andersen ME, Clewell HJThe Hamner Institutes <strong>for</strong> Health SciencesP.61 Effects of early life exposureto air pollution on childhood ADHDamong newborn infants in TaiwanLin MH, Ho WC, Chen PC, Cheng TJ,Wu TNChina Medical UniversityP.62 Ozone exposure is associatedwith cardiovascular diseases mortalitybased on both acute and longer termanalysesHo WC, Lin MH, Lin YS, Chen PC,Cheng TJ, Wu TNChina Medical UniversityP.63 Review of issues relevant toambient air quality criteriaHaber LT, Kaden DA, Meek ME, SchroederJTERA, ENVIRON, University of Ottawa,Ontario Ministry of the EnvironmentP.64 Using in<strong>for</strong>mation from alternativemodels to guide researchin mixtures: a case study on interactionsbetween Polycyclic AromaticHydrocarbons (PAHs) with differentmechanisms of action in zebrafishFleming CR, Di Giulio RT, Lambert JCOak Ridge Institute <strong>for</strong> Science and Education,Duke University, US EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH23
- Page 4 and 5: Ballroom C1Monday10:30 AM-NoonM2-A
- Page 9 and 10: US Environmental Protection Agency
- Page 11 and 12: Workshops - Sunday, December 4Full
- Page 13 and 14: WK9: Eliciting Judgments to Inform
- Page 15 and 16: These freely available tools apply
- Page 17 and 18: Plenary SessionsAll Plenary Session
- Page 19 and 20: 10:30 AM-NoonRoom 8/9M2-F Panel Dis
- Page 21 and 22: 1:30-3:00 PMRoom 8/9M3-F Symposium:
- Page 23: 4:50 pm M4-E.5Modeling of landscape
- Page 27 and 28: Works-In-ProgressP.99 Assessing the
- Page 29 and 30: 10:30 AM-NoonRoom 8/9T2-F Error in
- Page 31 and 32: 1:30-3:00 PMRoom 8/9T3-F AppliedMet
- Page 34 and 35: 8:30-10:00 AMBallroom C1W1-A Sympos
- Page 36 and 37: 10:30 AM-NoonBallroom C1W2-A Commun
- Page 38: 1:30-3:00 PMBallroom C1W3-A Communi
- Page 41 and 42: 3:30-4:30 PMRoom 8/9W4-F Environmen
- Page 43 and 44: oth recent advances, and ongoing ch
- Page 45 and 46: M3-H Symposium: Analyzing and Manag
- Page 47 and 48: Part 2, we consider the use of expe
- Page 49 and 50: T4-E Symposium: Food Safety Risk Pr
- Page 51 and 52: While integral to guiding the devel
- Page 53 and 54: have contributed to past difficulti
- Page 55 and 56: M2-C.1 Abraham IM, Henry S; abraham
- Page 58 and 59: serious accident of the Tokyo Elect
- Page 60 and 61: een found that independence assumpt
- Page 62 and 63: W4-I.1 Beach RH, McCarl BA, Ohrel S
- Page 64 and 65: M4-A.1 Berube DM; dmberube@ncsu.edu
- Page 66 and 67: W4-A.1 Boerner FU, Jardine C, Dried
- Page 69 and 70: M2-G.1 Brink SA, Davidson RA; rdavi
- Page 71 and 72: M4-H.5 Buede DM, Ezell BC, Guikema
- Page 73 and 74: same scientists’ environmental he
- Page 75 and 76:
periods of time. Successful adaptat
- Page 77 and 78:
P.123 Charnley G, Melnikov F, Beck
- Page 79 and 80:
derived from mouse and rat testes t
- Page 81 and 82:
esources under any circumstance in
- Page 83 and 84:
W4-B.3 Convertino M, Collier ZA, Va
- Page 85 and 86:
addition, over 10% thought that eve
- Page 87 and 88:
Reference Dose (RfD). The average e
- Page 89 and 90:
W2-H.2 Demuth JL, Morss RE, Morrow
- Page 91 and 92:
T4-H.4 Dingus CA, McMillan NJ, Born
- Page 93 and 94:
methods research priorities and pot
- Page 95 and 96:
W3-A.2 Eggers SL, Thorne SL, Sousa
- Page 97 and 98:
tions) were < 1 for sub-populations
- Page 99 and 100:
sociated with model error. Second,
- Page 101 and 102:
inter-donation interval to mitigate
- Page 103 and 104:
Fukushima nuclear accident coverage
- Page 105 and 106:
for growth inhibitor use and retail
- Page 107 and 108:
W1-C.1 Goble R, Hattis D; rgoble@cl
- Page 109 and 110:
stakeholders. The utility of this m
- Page 111 and 112:
T2-E.4 Guidotti TL; tee.guidotti@gm
- Page 113 and 114:
M4-C.2 Haines DA, Murray JL, Donald
- Page 115 and 116:
providing normative information of
- Page 117 and 118:
then allow both systems to operate
- Page 119 and 120:
tious disease outbreaks. Several cl
- Page 121 and 122:
P.122 Hosseinali Mirza V, de Marcel
- Page 123 and 124:
W2-B.1 Isukapalli SS, Brinkerhoff C
- Page 125 and 126:
M3-G.3 Jardine CG, Driedger SM, Fur
- Page 127 and 128:
P.88 Johnson BB, Cuite C, Hallman W
- Page 129 and 130:
metrics to provide risk management
- Page 131 and 132:
M4-C.1 Koch HM, Angerer J; koch@ipa
- Page 133 and 134:
certainty factors) and comparative
- Page 135 and 136:
T3-D.4 LaRocca S, Guikema SD, Cole
- Page 137 and 138:
P.71 Lemus-Martinez C, Lemyre L, Pi
- Page 139 and 140:
of excretion, and the increased che
- Page 141 and 142:
M2-D.4 MacKenzie CA, Barker K; cmac
- Page 143 and 144:
isk appetite and optimal risk mitig
- Page 145 and 146:
ameters, and enabled a more robust
- Page 147 and 148:
over the nature and format of infor
- Page 149 and 150:
Analysis (PRA). Existing parametric
- Page 151 and 152:
explosion of a bomb in a building,
- Page 153 and 154:
T3-G.3 Nascarella MA; mnascarella@g
- Page 155 and 156:
corresponding slowdown in container
- Page 157 and 158:
ing the scope and usage of the cybe
- Page 159 and 160:
dose for a variety of exposure scen
- Page 161 and 162:
“nanofibers”) is relatively und
- Page 163 and 164:
ment (CEA), which provides both a f
- Page 165 and 166:
T3-D.2 Resurreccion JZ, Santos JR;
- Page 167 and 168:
shore wind turbines have yet been b
- Page 169 and 170:
T2-D.3 Rypinski AD, Cantral R; Arth
- Page 171 and 172:
time and temperature, determining t
- Page 173 and 174:
esponse to requests from the EC, th
- Page 175 and 176:
ers and inspectors. Analysis examin
- Page 177 and 178:
smoked salmon, and associated expos
- Page 179 and 180:
and 95th percentiles). Increasing t
- Page 181 and 182:
esponse relationship for B. anthrac
- Page 183 and 184:
variation on Day 0. Results showed
- Page 185 and 186:
sidered. The most significant resul
- Page 187 and 188:
lived in a apartment (not including
- Page 189 and 190:
W3-C.4 von Stackelberg KE; kvon@eri
- Page 191 and 192:
P.12 Waller RR, Dinis MF; rw@protec
- Page 193 and 194:
W2-B.6 Wang D, Collier Z, Mitchell-
- Page 195 and 196:
iomonitoring “equivalent” level
- Page 197 and 198:
T4-H.2 Winkel D, Good K, VonNiederh
- Page 199 and 200:
mation insufficiency, risk percepti
- Page 201 and 202:
choices. This work examines these s
- Page 203 and 204:
sults and possible intended or unin
- Page 205 and 206:
AAbadin HG.................... 36,
- Page 207 and 208:
Gray GM............................
- Page 209 and 210:
Peters E...........................
- Page 211 and 212:
SECOND FLOOR Floor MapConvention Ce