8:30-10:00 AMBallroom C1W1-A Symposium: How thePublic Responds toDifferent Disasters overTime: The Role ofPerceived <strong>Risk</strong>, Emotionand <strong>Risk</strong> CommunicationSponsored by: RCSG, SDSGChair: William Burns8:30 am W1-A.1Incorporating a value-focused decisionmodel of public response intosetting recovery policy following alarge-scale biological disasterRosoff H, John R, Burns WUniversity of Southern Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, CRE-ATE8:50 am W1-A.2Avoidance and adaptive behaviorsfollowing the Fukushima nuclear disaster:lessons in preparing <strong>for</strong> radiologicalterrorismSheppard BUniversity of Maryland9:10 am W1-A.3The instructional dynamic in riskmessages: a comparative analysis ofmessages intended to enhance perceptionsof self-protectionSellnow TL, Veil SR, Wickline M, RobertsHUniversity of Kentucky9:30 am W1-A.4Public response in the U.S. to theJapanese crisis: reactions to the earthquakeand tsunami versus the nuclearaccidentBurns WJDecision Research328:30-10:00 AMBallroom C2W1-B Symposium:Analytical Approaches toFood Safety ManagementSponsored by: MRASGChair: Neal Golden8:30 am W1-B.1Incorporating uncertainty when evaluatingrisk assessment metrics: modelingListeria monocytogenes contaminationin ready-to-eat deli meatsGallagher DL, Ebel E, Gallagher OD,LaBarre D, Williams M, Golden N,Kause J, Deerfield KVirginia Tech8:50 am W1-B.2Use of risk assessment with risk managementmetrics to link public healthestimates to food safety per<strong>for</strong>manceKause J, Dearfield K, Ebel ED, GoldenNJ, LaBarre D, Disney TGovernment9:10 am W1-B.3<strong>Risk</strong> management metrics in domesticfood safety and international tradecontexts: the changing role of quantifiedvariability and uncertainty in differentcontextsPaoli G, Ryan C, Hartnett E, Golden NJ,Dearfield K, Kause J, LaBarre D, Disney T<strong>Risk</strong> Sciences International9:30 am W1-B.4Techniques <strong>for</strong> linking public healthgoals and microbiological criteriaacross multiple hazards: applicationto poultry, salmonella and campylobacterRyan C, Paoli G, Hartnett E*, GoldenNJ, Dearfield K, Kause J, LaBarre D,Disney T<strong>Risk</strong> Sciences InternationalWednesday8:30-10:00 AMBallroom C3W1-C <strong>Risk</strong> Theory andPracticeChair: Steve Lewis8:30 am W1-C.1The Pantoxin Project: a value of in<strong>for</strong>mationframework <strong>for</strong> combiningin<strong>for</strong>mation of different types inchemical risk dose-response assessments.Goble R, Hattis DClark University8:50 am W1-C.2Critical analysis of radiation protectionregulationsTikhomirov NP, Tikhomirova TMPlekhanov Russia University of Economics9:10 am W1-C.3<strong>Final</strong>ly, a SCIENTIFIC definition ofadverse effectBelzer RBRegulatory Checkbook9:30 am W1-C.4None of the occupational exposurelimits reveal risk in<strong>for</strong>mation: aquantitative‘nudge’ could save livesFinkel AM, Altemose B, Hattis DUniversity of Pennsylvania Law School8:30-10:00 AMRoom 6W1-D Methods to In<strong>for</strong>mEnvironmentalManagementSponsored by: ERASGChair: Branden Johnson8:30 am W1-D.1Assessing risk of invasive species undersevere uncertainty: a dominancebasedapproachYemshanov D, Koch F, Lyons B, Ducey M,Koehler KNatural Resources Canada, Canadian ForestService, North Carolina State University,University of New Hampshire, CanadianFood Inspection Agency8:50 am W1-D.2Advancements in integrated wildfirerisk assessmentThompson MP, Calkin DEUS Forest Service9:10 am W1-D.3Challenges of managing small suburbannatural areas: Public beliefs, attitudesand behaviors regarding ecologicaleffectsJohnson BB, Horowitz L, Ehrenfeld JDecision Research9:30 am W1-D.4An ecological, multidisciplinary approachto nuclear facilities: protectingsociety, human health and the environment.Burger J, Gochfeld M, Clarke J, Powers C,Kosson DRutgers State University, CRESP, Vanderbilt
8:30-10:00 AMRoom 8/9W1-F Symposium: <strong>Risk</strong>Assessment <strong>for</strong> Acquisitionand Assets ManagementSponsored by: DARSGChair: Igor Linkov8:30 am W1-F.1Identification, prioritization, andmanagement of risks <strong>for</strong> energy systemsacquisition and portfolio of assetsHamilton M, Lambert J, Linkov IUniversity of Virginia8:50 am W1-F.2Best practices <strong>for</strong> risk and trade spaceanalysis <strong>for</strong> acquisition management:overview of the military operationsresearch society workshopScriven J, Linkov IUS Army TRADOC, Engineer Researchand Development Center9:10 am W1-F.3Review of risk analysis use in Departmentof Defense (DoD) acquisitionPabon NA, Collier Z, Linkov IUS Army Corps Engineer Research andDevelopment Center9:30 am W1-F.4Portfolio optimization <strong>for</strong> asset management:a USACE case studyValverde LJ, Convertino M, Dokukin D,Keisler J, Linkov IUS Army Engineer Research and DevelopmentCenter and University of Massachussets8:30-10:00 AMRoom 10W1-G Uncertainty, Bears,Dioxin and Well WaterChair: Lori Severtson8:30 am W1-G.1Carnivores as a hazard: the role ofrisk perception in predicting publicacceptanceZajac RM, Bruskotter JT, Wilson RS,Prange SThe Ohio State University, Ohio Divisionof Wildlife8:50 am W1-G.2Exploring the use of evaluative labelsto increase the saliency of uncertaintyin<strong>for</strong>mationDieckmann NF, Gregory R, Peters E,Tusler MDecision Research, Ohio State University9:10 am W1-G.3Do maps promote water testingamong residents with private wells?The influence of map features andperceived proximity to mapped hazardson risk beliefs, uncertainty, andtesting intentions.Severtson DJUW-Madison9:30 am W1-G.4Misconceptions in community members’mental models of dioxin-likecompounds following an exposureassessment studyZikmund-Fisher BJ, Diebol JK, Ross PT,Turkelson AE, Weber I, Franzblau AD,Parker EAUniversity of Michigan, University of IowaWednesday8:30-10:00 AMRoom 11W1-H Symposium:Managing <strong>Risk</strong>s fromHurricanes in CoastalAreasSponsored by: SDSGChair: Henry Willis8:30 am W1-H.1<strong>Risk</strong>-based regional hurricane evacuationplanningApivatanagul P, Davidson RA, NozickLK, Wachtendorf TUniversity of Delaware, Cornell University8:50 am W1-H.2Expert perspectives <strong>for</strong> improvingUSACE flood risk management andstakeholder engagementWood MD, Linkov I, Bridges TCarnegie Mellon University, US ArmyCorps of Engineers, Engineer Researchand Development Center - EnvironmentalLaboratory9:10 am W1-H.3Assessing long-term flood risks tocoastal Louisiana under deep uncertaintyFischbach JR, Ortiz DS, Johnson DR,Burger NERAND Corporation9:30 am W1-H.4Adapting to future hurricane risk inNew Orleans under climate changeuncertaintyWillis HH, Groves D, Fischbach J, JohnsonDJ, Andrews LRAND Corporation8:30-10:00 AMRoom 12/13W1-I Preference Elicitationand Benefits Assessments,Part 1Chair: Sandra Hoffman8:30 am W1-I.1Preferences related to urban sustainabilityunder risk, uncertainty, anddynamics: a combined elicitation andmodeling approachGray GM, Francis RA, Carruthers JI,Malcyznski LA, Lee RCGeorge Washington University, SandiaNational Laboratories, Neptune and Company,Inc.8:50 am W1-I.2Intrahousehold bargaining and stated-choiceexperiments: mothers’fathers’, and couples’ willingness-topayto protect their children from environmentalneurotoxinsHoffmann S, Krupnick A, Adamowicz V,Bostrom AUSDA Economic Research Service, Resources<strong>for</strong> the Future, University of Alberta,University of Washington9:10 am W1-I.3Preferences <strong>for</strong> and perception ofroad safetyAndersson HToulouse School of Economics9:30 am W1-I.4Quantifying health impacts in lifeyears:a bridge between two methodsBrand KB, Stieb DUniversity of Ottawa, Health-Canada33
- Page 4 and 5: Ballroom C1Monday10:30 AM-NoonM2-A
- Page 9 and 10: US Environmental Protection Agency
- Page 11 and 12: Workshops - Sunday, December 4Full
- Page 13 and 14: WK9: Eliciting Judgments to Inform
- Page 15 and 16: These freely available tools apply
- Page 17 and 18: Plenary SessionsAll Plenary Session
- Page 19 and 20: 10:30 AM-NoonRoom 8/9M2-F Panel Dis
- Page 21 and 22: 1:30-3:00 PMRoom 8/9M3-F Symposium:
- Page 23 and 24: 4:50 pm M4-E.5Modeling of landscape
- Page 25 and 26: P.35 Health risk assessment of meta
- Page 27 and 28: Works-In-ProgressP.99 Assessing the
- Page 29 and 30: 10:30 AM-NoonRoom 8/9T2-F Error in
- Page 31 and 32: 1:30-3:00 PMRoom 8/9T3-F AppliedMet
- Page 36 and 37: 10:30 AM-NoonBallroom C1W2-A Commun
- Page 38: 1:30-3:00 PMBallroom C1W3-A Communi
- Page 41 and 42: 3:30-4:30 PMRoom 8/9W4-F Environmen
- Page 43 and 44: oth recent advances, and ongoing ch
- Page 45 and 46: M3-H Symposium: Analyzing and Manag
- Page 47 and 48: Part 2, we consider the use of expe
- Page 49 and 50: T4-E Symposium: Food Safety Risk Pr
- Page 51 and 52: While integral to guiding the devel
- Page 53 and 54: have contributed to past difficulti
- Page 55 and 56: M2-C.1 Abraham IM, Henry S; abraham
- Page 58 and 59: serious accident of the Tokyo Elect
- Page 60 and 61: een found that independence assumpt
- Page 62 and 63: W4-I.1 Beach RH, McCarl BA, Ohrel S
- Page 64 and 65: M4-A.1 Berube DM; dmberube@ncsu.edu
- Page 66 and 67: W4-A.1 Boerner FU, Jardine C, Dried
- Page 69 and 70: M2-G.1 Brink SA, Davidson RA; rdavi
- Page 71 and 72: M4-H.5 Buede DM, Ezell BC, Guikema
- Page 73 and 74: same scientists’ environmental he
- Page 75 and 76: periods of time. Successful adaptat
- Page 77 and 78: P.123 Charnley G, Melnikov F, Beck
- Page 79 and 80: derived from mouse and rat testes t
- Page 81 and 82: esources under any circumstance in
- Page 83 and 84:
W4-B.3 Convertino M, Collier ZA, Va
- Page 85 and 86:
addition, over 10% thought that eve
- Page 87 and 88:
Reference Dose (RfD). The average e
- Page 89 and 90:
W2-H.2 Demuth JL, Morss RE, Morrow
- Page 91 and 92:
T4-H.4 Dingus CA, McMillan NJ, Born
- Page 93 and 94:
methods research priorities and pot
- Page 95 and 96:
W3-A.2 Eggers SL, Thorne SL, Sousa
- Page 97 and 98:
tions) were < 1 for sub-populations
- Page 99 and 100:
sociated with model error. Second,
- Page 101 and 102:
inter-donation interval to mitigate
- Page 103 and 104:
Fukushima nuclear accident coverage
- Page 105 and 106:
for growth inhibitor use and retail
- Page 107 and 108:
W1-C.1 Goble R, Hattis D; rgoble@cl
- Page 109 and 110:
stakeholders. The utility of this m
- Page 111 and 112:
T2-E.4 Guidotti TL; tee.guidotti@gm
- Page 113 and 114:
M4-C.2 Haines DA, Murray JL, Donald
- Page 115 and 116:
providing normative information of
- Page 117 and 118:
then allow both systems to operate
- Page 119 and 120:
tious disease outbreaks. Several cl
- Page 121 and 122:
P.122 Hosseinali Mirza V, de Marcel
- Page 123 and 124:
W2-B.1 Isukapalli SS, Brinkerhoff C
- Page 125 and 126:
M3-G.3 Jardine CG, Driedger SM, Fur
- Page 127 and 128:
P.88 Johnson BB, Cuite C, Hallman W
- Page 129 and 130:
metrics to provide risk management
- Page 131 and 132:
M4-C.1 Koch HM, Angerer J; koch@ipa
- Page 133 and 134:
certainty factors) and comparative
- Page 135 and 136:
T3-D.4 LaRocca S, Guikema SD, Cole
- Page 137 and 138:
P.71 Lemus-Martinez C, Lemyre L, Pi
- Page 139 and 140:
of excretion, and the increased che
- Page 141 and 142:
M2-D.4 MacKenzie CA, Barker K; cmac
- Page 143 and 144:
isk appetite and optimal risk mitig
- Page 145 and 146:
ameters, and enabled a more robust
- Page 147 and 148:
over the nature and format of infor
- Page 149 and 150:
Analysis (PRA). Existing parametric
- Page 151 and 152:
explosion of a bomb in a building,
- Page 153 and 154:
T3-G.3 Nascarella MA; mnascarella@g
- Page 155 and 156:
corresponding slowdown in container
- Page 157 and 158:
ing the scope and usage of the cybe
- Page 159 and 160:
dose for a variety of exposure scen
- Page 161 and 162:
“nanofibers”) is relatively und
- Page 163 and 164:
ment (CEA), which provides both a f
- Page 165 and 166:
T3-D.2 Resurreccion JZ, Santos JR;
- Page 167 and 168:
shore wind turbines have yet been b
- Page 169 and 170:
T2-D.3 Rypinski AD, Cantral R; Arth
- Page 171 and 172:
time and temperature, determining t
- Page 173 and 174:
esponse to requests from the EC, th
- Page 175 and 176:
ers and inspectors. Analysis examin
- Page 177 and 178:
smoked salmon, and associated expos
- Page 179 and 180:
and 95th percentiles). Increasing t
- Page 181 and 182:
esponse relationship for B. anthrac
- Page 183 and 184:
variation on Day 0. Results showed
- Page 185 and 186:
sidered. The most significant resul
- Page 187 and 188:
lived in a apartment (not including
- Page 189 and 190:
W3-C.4 von Stackelberg KE; kvon@eri
- Page 191 and 192:
P.12 Waller RR, Dinis MF; rw@protec
- Page 193 and 194:
W2-B.6 Wang D, Collier Z, Mitchell-
- Page 195 and 196:
iomonitoring “equivalent” level
- Page 197 and 198:
T4-H.2 Winkel D, Good K, VonNiederh
- Page 199 and 200:
mation insufficiency, risk percepti
- Page 201 and 202:
choices. This work examines these s
- Page 203 and 204:
sults and possible intended or unin
- Page 205 and 206:
AAbadin HG.................... 36,
- Page 207 and 208:
Gray GM............................
- Page 209 and 210:
Peters E...........................
- Page 211 and 212:
SECOND FLOOR Floor MapConvention Ce