12.07.2015 Views

Final Program - Society for Risk Analysis

Final Program - Society for Risk Analysis

Final Program - Society for Risk Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

smoked salmon, and associated exposures and risks. Intensive data acquisition wasfocused on filling the needs of the exposure model. Data specifically obtained in thiscontext and then directly used as inputs of the risk assessment included <strong>for</strong> example:626 detection analyses, 384 enumeration analyses with a specific sensitive protocol(LOQ=0.2 cfu/g), 61 challenge tests, 15 storage trials, 132 time-temperature profiles.The second case is a feasibility study per<strong>for</strong>med by IRSN (Institute of radioprotectionand nuclear safety) to simulate with the modeling plat<strong>for</strong>m SYMBIOSE the fateof radiological releases (particularly 131I, 134Cs and 137Cs) in the terrestrial environmentof the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power station (Japan). The context, i.e. thedistance between France and Japan and the wish to per<strong>for</strong>m calculations quickly, ledIRSN to rely only on publically available sources. Collected data used as inputs <strong>for</strong> thesimulations included <strong>for</strong> example: the land use (derived from remote-sensing processingof a Landsat scene), or the contamination of soil and surface water. Many crudeassumptions were made when no trustworthy in<strong>for</strong>mation was found (e.g. concerninganimals’ feed). The Japanese ministries also made available measures <strong>for</strong> thousandsof samples (edible and non edible plants, other foods), that were used <strong>for</strong> model-datacomparison.P.37 Simon-Cornu M, Beaugelin-Seiller K, Calmon P, Mourlon C, NicoulaudV, Garcia-Sanchez L, Gonze MA; marie.simon-cornu@free.frInstitut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire (IRSN), DEI, Cadarache, FranceCONDUCTING UNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSES INRADIOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT WITH THE PROBABILISTICDATABASEOF SYMBIOSESymbiose is a simulation plat<strong>for</strong>m assessing the fate of radioactive hazards inenvironmental systems, and their impact on humans. The main concern is to promotea scientific and software approach that is flexible enough to deal with a wide rangeof situations, from simplified generic studies to more realistic spatially-distributedand site-specific assessments, <strong>for</strong> assessing risks induced by radioactive releases fromnuclear facilities under accidental, decommissioning or normal operating conditions.Environmental models in Symbiose address media such as atmospheric, terrestrial,freshwater and marine systems, as well as major transfer processes at their interfaces.Equations and default parameters (modifiable by the user) are proposed on the basisof multiple sources (refereed literature, grey literature, own datasets) to account <strong>for</strong>hundreds of components and interactions, most of which are modeled using a mechanisticapproach (i.e. with physically-based parameterisation). A calculation engineoffers various numerical solvers dealing with possibly complex system dynamics, andfunctioning in either a deterministic or probabilistic mode (Monte Carlo). On thebasis of an International Atomic Energy Agency report, log-normal and log-uni<strong>for</strong>mprobability distribution functions (PDF) were added to account <strong>for</strong> uncertainty onkey inputs when modelling transfer of radioactive substances in continental environments:liquid-solid interactions in rivers and soils, root uptake by plants, transfer toanimals, storage of foods... Rules to trans<strong>for</strong>m available data into log-normal andlog-uni<strong>for</strong>m PDF were applied as a function of the scarcity of data and taking intoaccount (spatial, temporal‚...) variability issues. When per<strong>for</strong>ming uncertainty and/or sensitivity analyses, this probabilistic database can be used either as such or as adefault basis to be completed. This offers promising perspectives in a field where suchanalyses are claimed to be necessary but still rarely applied.T4-G.3 Skinner DJC, Rocks SA, Drew GH, Pollard SJT; d.j.skinner@cranfield.ac.ukCranfield UniversityIDENTIFYING UNCERTAINTIES WITHIN ENVIRONMENTAL RISKASSESSMENTSUncertainties in environmental risk assessments (ERAs) must be addressed ifthe results are to be communicated with a high level of confidence. Current typologiesof uncertainties are difficult to implement1. This research introduces an evidencebasedsystem to help identify uncertainties in ERAs in order to resolve this problem.Previously, the different types of uncertainties present in ERAs were identified andthe relationships between them and other aspects of the assessments were analysed.The resulting uncertainty typology and statistical analyses are applied to case studiesconsisting of peer-reviewed articles from the fields of genetically modified higherplants, air quality, and chemicals. These research areas have large evidence bases fromwhich observations can be drawn, involve an array of assessment processes, and containwell-documented uncertainties. The collated articles were reviewed <strong>for</strong> instancesof uncertainty, and the strengths of the previously highlighted relationships wereinvestigated further. An analysis of the collected data enabled the development ofthree field-specific identification systems, centred on the strong relationships betweenthe uncertainties and the different types of evidence employed in the ERA. These distinctsystems were then adapted into a transferrable generic tool. Testing of this toolis ongoing, and focuses on the emerging risk area of engineered nanomaterials andpreliminary results are presented. It is intended that this research will be of use in the<strong>for</strong>mative stages of ERAs and uncertainty assessments, and that it will promote anunderstanding of the potential failings. Furthermore, it will help practitioners designand per<strong>for</strong>m assessments with these uncertainties in mind. This work is funded byCranfield University/Defra/EPSRC/ESRC/NERC under grant EP/G022682/1. 1Klinke et al, 1999, European Science and Technology Observatory: Sevilla, 19056/EN/2.175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!