12.07.2015 Views

From Poverty to Power Green, Oxfam 2008 - weman

From Poverty to Power Green, Oxfam 2008 - weman

From Poverty to Power Green, Oxfam 2008 - weman

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FINANCEActive citizens played a large role in obliging governments in bothrich and poor countries <strong>to</strong> move on the debt issue. The Freedom fromDebt Coalition in the Philippines and Koalisi Anti Utang in Indonesiaboth campaigned against ‘illegitimate debt’. In May 1998, 70,000Jubilee 2000 supporters formed a human chain around the G8 summitin Birmingham, UK and – as politicians inside the meeting laterconfirmed – forced debt on<strong>to</strong> the summit agenda, which culminatedin the Enhanced HIPC programme a year later. Global campaigningby Make <strong>Poverty</strong> His<strong>to</strong>ry and the Global Call <strong>to</strong> Action against <strong>Poverty</strong>achieved a similar breakthrough at the G8 summit in Scotland in2005. Each time, governments swore that the latest debt relief initiativewould be the last. Luckily, citizens refused <strong>to</strong> believe them and, whenthe plight of deb<strong>to</strong>r nations failed <strong>to</strong> improve, continued <strong>to</strong> campaignfor more.Naturally, credi<strong>to</strong>rs continued <strong>to</strong> try <strong>to</strong> set the terms of thenegotiations, but effective states proved themselves able <strong>to</strong> negotiatebetter terms. Argentina played hardball with the IMF and other credi<strong>to</strong>rsafter its 2002 crisis, and was thus able <strong>to</strong> rebuild its economy atrecord speed.With HIPC, the credi<strong>to</strong>rs began <strong>to</strong> break new ground by actuallywriting off debts, rather than simply rescheduling them; by includingmultilateral, rather than just bilateral, debt; by dividing relief equitablyamong credi<strong>to</strong>rs; and, in the Enhanced HIPC initiative, by basing debtrelief on a ‘poverty reduction strategy’ drawn up by the government inconsultation with civil society (see page 301). The most recent incarnation,the MDRI, has gone still further by offering full cancellation ofcountries’ debts <strong>to</strong> the IFIs incurred up <strong>to</strong> certain dates, a limitedapplication of the ‘100 per cent cancellation’ that campaigners hadlong called for and which credi<strong>to</strong>rs had long claimed was impossible.Serious concerns remain about both the HIPC and the MDRI, notleast the extent <strong>to</strong> which they have entrenched the force of, in particular,IMF conditions. Countries must comply with these <strong>to</strong> get debt relief,which forces them <strong>to</strong> spend years implementing painful structuraladjustment policies in order <strong>to</strong> access the debt cancellation that waspromised <strong>to</strong> them as a solution <strong>to</strong> an urgent crisis. This is connected <strong>to</strong>the fact that the HIPC and the MDRI are designed, implemented, andmoni<strong>to</strong>red by the IFIs, with credi<strong>to</strong>rs treated as generous benefac<strong>to</strong>rs307

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!