12.07.2015 Views

From Poverty to Power Green, Oxfam 2008 - weman

From Poverty to Power Green, Oxfam 2008 - weman

From Poverty to Power Green, Oxfam 2008 - weman

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FROM POVERTY TO POWERemissions by 80 per cent by 2050 compared <strong>to</strong> 1990 levels (the level ofreductions required <strong>to</strong> minimise the risk of catastrophic climatechange). 240Such a wholesale switch <strong>to</strong> new and existing clean technologieswould require a massive effort on a global scale, overriding intellectualproperty rules and short-term commercial self-interest, and backedby appropriate funding. It also ignores issues such as the rapidly risinguse of air travel, which is becoming increasingly significant as a sourceof greenhouse gases, without any low-carbon alternative in sight. Itmay well be that patterns of consumption have <strong>to</strong> change as much aspatterns of production. These are huge challenges, but the alternativesare equally unpalatable: cross your fingers and hope for sometechnological magic bullet <strong>to</strong> emerge, or accept lower global rates ofgrowth in the market economy.In practice, avoiding catastrophic climate change is likely <strong>to</strong>require a mix of solutions, including accelerated technology transfer,innovation, and reduced emissions in the big polluter countries. Itremains an open question whether this will include lower growth ratesin some or all countries, or whether a combination of human ingenuityand political leadership will be enough.For the poorest countries, the transition <strong>to</strong> a low-carbon economymay not be so urgent – after all, with the exception of the giant andrapidly growing economies of China and India, their carbon footprintremains very small. Eventually, however, they will have <strong>to</strong> find a path<strong>to</strong> development that does not rely on massive fossil fuel consumption,either because prices are simply <strong>to</strong>o high or because (in a manneranalogous <strong>to</strong> the nuclear proliferation treaty) those countries thathave already used huge reserves of carbon <strong>to</strong> industrialise their owneconomies will deny that option <strong>to</strong> others. Another key considerationis whether poor countries can afford <strong>to</strong> be ‘locked out’ of new,low-carbon energy systems that will inevitably become a driver ofcompetitiveness in the future.In effect, poor countries will have <strong>to</strong> make transitions <strong>to</strong> carbonefficienteconomies earlier in their development paths than <strong>to</strong>day’sdeveloped countries did, just as they are currently doing in terms oftransitions <strong>to</strong> literacy, low child mortality rates, and lower birth rates.At the very least, this will require a change of mindset among elites in420

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!