12.07.2015 Views

From Poverty to Power Green, Oxfam 2008 - weman

From Poverty to Power Green, Oxfam 2008 - weman

From Poverty to Power Green, Oxfam 2008 - weman

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FROM POVERTY TO POWERresearch efforts have centred on male-controlled prevention methods.In sub-Saharan Africa, where the target population is primarilyheterosexual and women’s bargaining power over sex is limited, aprevention method that could be controlled by women and would notblock procreation is an urgent need. Recent initiatives have sought <strong>to</strong>fill the gap, but a breakthrough is still years away. Likewise, anaffordable female condom that could protect millions of women fromHIV infection has still not been developed.The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, among others, hopes <strong>to</strong>help correct this bias by offering grants <strong>to</strong> fund R&D for neglecteddiseases. The UK, Canada, and other governments are offering whatthey call ‘advance market commitments’: a guarantee <strong>to</strong> buy bulk suppliesof new vaccines in order <strong>to</strong> encourage research. The basic idea is notnew. In 1714 the British government offered £20,000 – a fortune at thetime – <strong>to</strong> whoever could invent a way of measuring longitude at sea.The offer worked: by 1735 the clockmaker and inven<strong>to</strong>r John Harrisonhad produced an accurate maritime chronometer. 65Research is increasingly dominated by the private sec<strong>to</strong>r. In agriculture,five large multinational companies – Bayer, Dow Agro,DuPont, Monsan<strong>to</strong>, and Syngenta – spend $7.3bn per year onagricultural research. This is more than 18 times the budget of thepublicly funded Consultative Group on International AgriculturalResearch. 66 Left <strong>to</strong> its own devices, private sec<strong>to</strong>r research will respond<strong>to</strong> future opportunities for profit, not public need (although the twomay coincide), so tropical diseases or improved varieties of the staplefoods of poor communities, such as cassava and sorghum, are likely <strong>to</strong>be overlooked in favour of high-value, high-profit products.R&D may benefit people living in poverty, even when it is dominatedby the wealthy and run by the private sec<strong>to</strong>r. But it is less likely<strong>to</strong> improve their prospects than R&D geared more closely <strong>to</strong> theirneeds, and may run greater risks. Biotechnology, for example, maywell produce drought-resistant strains of seeds that become an essential<strong>to</strong>ol for adapting <strong>to</strong> climate change. However, it could also erode thegenetic diversity on which developing-country farmers rely, and placeexcessive power in the hands of transnational corporations throughtheir control of seed strains.56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!