12.07.2015 Views

From Poverty to Power Green, Oxfam 2008 - weman

From Poverty to Power Green, Oxfam 2008 - weman

From Poverty to Power Green, Oxfam 2008 - weman

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FROM POVERTY TO POWERnumber of‘framing’assumptions that influence the debate on migration:that it is morally legitimate <strong>to</strong> discriminate on the basis of nationality;that development is about countries, not individuals; that our responsibility<strong>to</strong>wards others varies with geographical proximity. 93This raises the thorny question of whether there is a ‘right <strong>to</strong>migrate’. The UN Declaration of Human Rights states only that‘everyone has the right <strong>to</strong> freedom of movement and residence withinthe borders of each State’(so there is a right <strong>to</strong> internal migration) andthat ‘everyone has the right <strong>to</strong> leave any country, including his own,and <strong>to</strong> return <strong>to</strong> his country’ (so there is a right <strong>to</strong> emigrate but noobligation on any country <strong>to</strong> admit the migrant, excluding asylumcases, which are covered elsewhere). More recently the UN’s SpecialRapporteur on the right <strong>to</strong> food has argued that the right of asylumshould be expanded <strong>to</strong> include people fleeing from hunger andfamine, which would certainly include some of those currently classifiedas ‘economic migrants’. 94 In general however, there is little comfort <strong>to</strong>migrants from international human rights law: they are on their own.S<strong>to</strong>pping migration is both wrong and impossible. But for theforeseeable future, arguing for a return <strong>to</strong> a world of completely freemovement of people is a forlorn task. An approach with moreprospect of success would be <strong>to</strong> ask, ‘What are the policies <strong>to</strong>wardmigration that would be most beneficial <strong>to</strong> the world’s currently poorpeople (nearly all of whom reside in poor countries) and yet are (orcould be) still politically acceptable in rich countries?’ 95 Such anapproach would rule out two common proposals: select migrantsbased on a combination of qualifications and wealth, or agree rulesthrough the WTO. The first approach would prevent most poorpeople from migrating, while any agreement in the WTO is likely <strong>to</strong> beextremely weak and ineffective. Bilateral agreements provide moreprospect of success.Improving the contribution of migration <strong>to</strong> development requiresaction at a global level, as well as by governments, backed up by publicpressure, both North and South. In the long term, the flow of peopledeserves as much attention as that of capital or goods, perhapsthrough a World Migration Organisation, which would replace thelargely <strong>to</strong>othless International Organization for Migration. 96 In Europea Common Migration Policy could help by rescuing the issue from the338

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!