12.07.2015 Views

From Poverty to Power Green, Oxfam 2008 - weman

From Poverty to Power Green, Oxfam 2008 - weman

From Poverty to Power Green, Oxfam 2008 - weman

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 POWER AND POLITICS I HAVE RIGHTS, THEREFORE I AMRIGHTS AND POVERTY<strong>Oxfam</strong> starts from the premise that poverty is a state of relativepowerlessness in which people are denied the ability <strong>to</strong> control crucialaspects of their lives. 12 <strong>Poverty</strong> is a symp<strong>to</strong>m of deeply rooted inequitiesand unequal power relationships, institutionalised through policiesand practices at the levels of state, society, and household. People oftenlack money, land, or freedom because they are discriminated agains<strong>to</strong>n the grounds of one or more aspects of their personal identity –their class, gender, ethnicity, age, or sexuality – constraining their ability<strong>to</strong> claim and control the resources that allow them choices in life.One in seven people in the world – about 900 million people –experiences discrimination on the basis of ethnic, linguistic, orreligious identities alone. 13 These excluded groups form the hard coreof the ‘chronic poor’. Some unequal power relationships are due <strong>to</strong>age-old injustices. In the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh in northernIndia, for instance, close <strong>to</strong> 80 per cent of women require theirhusband’s permission <strong>to</strong> visit a health centre, and 60 per cent have <strong>to</strong>seek permission before stepping outside their house. Other suchrelationships are the more recent result of economic globalisation andimbalances in negotiating power between rich and poor countries.The underlying purpose of a rights-based approach <strong>to</strong> developmentis <strong>to</strong> identify ways of transforming the self-perpetuating viciouscircle of poverty, disempowerment, and conflict in<strong>to</strong> a virtuous circlein which all people, as rights-holders, can demand accountabilityfrom states as duty-bearers, and where duty-bearers have both thewillingness and capacity <strong>to</strong> fulfil, protect, and promote people’shuman rights.A rights-based approach rejects the notion that people living inpoverty can only meet their basic needs as passive recipients of charity.People are the active subjects of their own development, as they seek<strong>to</strong> realise their rights. Development ac<strong>to</strong>rs, including the state, shouldseek <strong>to</strong> build people’s capabilities <strong>to</strong> do so, by guaranteeing their rights<strong>to</strong> the essentials of a decent life: education, health care, water andsanitation, and protection against violence, repression, or suddendisaster. Less gritty issues such as access <strong>to</strong> information and technologyare no less important in the long run.27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!