12.07.2015 Views

Aboriginal Co-operatives in Canada - Centre for the Study of Co ...

Aboriginal Co-operatives in Canada - Centre for the Study of Co ...

Aboriginal Co-operatives in Canada - Centre for the Study of Co ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5. Relative Per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Co</strong>nsumer <strong>Co</strong>-opsIn section 5, we discuss <strong>the</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong> consumer co-ops <strong>in</strong> relation to allconsumer co-ops <strong>in</strong> <strong>Canada</strong>. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> comparisons will also <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> Canadian retailsector, whenever possible, to give a more general comparison framework. Note that <strong>the</strong> analysis<strong>of</strong> <strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong> consumer co-ops is most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> time biased toward <strong>the</strong> Canadian North, because90% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess is carried out <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> North.5.1 Average membershipAll <strong>Co</strong>nsumerFigure 5.1 Membership <strong>in</strong> Average <strong>Co</strong>nsumer<strong>Co</strong>-op: <strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong> Vs AllAt <strong>the</strong> Canadian level,5,500420membership <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> average5,187400consumer co-op <strong>in</strong>creased at a5,0004,814 399steady rate from 1993 to4,4703804,5001997. But <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> average4,0363604,000<strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong> consumer co-op3,684343340<strong>the</strong>re was no growth between3,5001993 and 1995. However,327 326327320from 343 members <strong>in</strong> 1996,3,0003001993 1994 1995 1996 1997Years<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>average <strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong> co-opAll <strong>Co</strong>nsumer <strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>Co</strong>nsumerjumped to almost 400. The membership <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> average consumer co-op was 13 times that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong> consumer co-op <strong>in</strong> 1997. A higher clientele bas<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> non-<strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong> locations ensuresa higher membership <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> non-<strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong> co-op.All <strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong>5.2 Full-time Employees and SalariesEven though <strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong>consumer co-ops are struggl<strong>in</strong>gcont<strong>in</strong>uously aga<strong>in</strong>st f<strong>in</strong>ancialdifficulties (primarily due tohigh transportation costs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>North), <strong>the</strong>y are stillconsidered <strong>the</strong> home <strong>of</strong>stability <strong>for</strong> <strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong>workers. Between 1993 andAll <strong>Co</strong>nsumer27.0026.5026.0025.5025.0024.5024.0023.5023.0022.5022.00Figure 5.2 Number <strong>of</strong> Full-time Employees <strong>in</strong> anAverage <strong>Co</strong>nsumer <strong>Co</strong>-op: <strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong> Vs All23.7112.9114.5423.8924.8514.3815.8025.711993 1994 1995 1996 1997All <strong>Co</strong>nsumerYear<strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>Co</strong>nsumer16.5026.4917.0016.5016.0015.5015.0014.5014.0013.5013.0012.5012.00<strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>Co</strong>nsumer97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!