Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...
Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...
Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Section J: Semantics / Cognition <strong>10</strong>9<br />
2. When analyz<strong>in</strong>g semantic peculiarities of parametrical adjectives, it is of vital<br />
importance to take <strong>in</strong>to consideration a pragmatic factor of the observer <strong>and</strong> the<br />
strategy of measur<strong>in</strong>g the object. The observer can occupy different positions <strong>in</strong><br />
respect to the perceived object <strong>and</strong> the observer’s perspective determ<strong>in</strong>es the direction<br />
of his look . Thus the object is perceived from different angles: from above or from<br />
below, from <strong>in</strong>side or outside. Different dimensions can be ascribed to one <strong>and</strong> the<br />
same object accord<strong>in</strong>g to the position of the observer <strong>in</strong> space relatively to this object.<br />
Vertical dimension of a big conta<strong>in</strong>er can be called height, if the observer is outside it<br />
<strong>and</strong> depth if the observer looks <strong>in</strong>side this conta<strong>in</strong>er from above ( a high vase, a deep<br />
vase, a high barrel, a deep barrel ).<br />
3. Among basic notions, play<strong>in</strong>g an important role <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation of parametrical<br />
characteristics of objects is the notion of norm. Norm st<strong>and</strong>ards are different for<br />
different objects (a deep raven <strong>and</strong> a deep wr<strong>in</strong>kle are <strong>in</strong>comparable). Names of some<br />
objects with st<strong>and</strong>ard parameters do not comb<strong>in</strong>e with parametrical adjectives ( *a<br />
long /wide/ thick dollar; *a long/ thick/ wide bacteria).<br />
4. The parametrical adjectives high, wide, long, thick <strong>and</strong> deep <strong>and</strong> their<br />
nom<strong>in</strong>alizations height, width, length, thickness, <strong>and</strong> depth refer to dimensions of<br />
objects measured along <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic <strong>and</strong> environmental axes, sometimes with reference<br />
to verticality or horizontality<br />
For <strong>in</strong>stance, length is extensional – it specifies the extent of an object that can be both<br />
horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical (long curta<strong>in</strong>s, long tunnel). Height is specified by environmental<br />
axes ( gravitational or contextual) <strong>and</strong> is applied to vertically oriented objects ( high<br />
build<strong>in</strong>g, high mounta<strong>in</strong>).<br />
A note on epistemic patterns underly<strong>in</strong>g the selected English<br />
idioms related to human body<br />
Kuzniak, Marek<br />
University of Wroclaw, Pol<strong>and</strong><br />
kuzniak@uni.wroc.pl<br />
The goal of the paper is to analyse a sample of 95 r<strong>and</strong>omly selected human body-part English<br />
idioms from the perspective of the epistemic orig<strong>in</strong>s that underlie them. By epistemic orig<strong>in</strong>s is<br />
meant the folk knowledge (schematically represented by the set of <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g pre-conceptual<br />
image-schema) shared by language users that is believed to directly relate to the evidenced<br />
orig<strong>in</strong> of a particular idiomatic expression. The aim of the analysis will, then, be to uncover<br />
cognitive-axiological epistemic patterns underly<strong>in</strong>g the quoted etymology of the idiom as<br />
relevant for its conventionalised dictionary mean<strong>in</strong>g. The discussed idioms will be organized<br />
<strong>in</strong>to subsets along the criteria that emerge out of the research. The ambition of the paper will be<br />
to argue aga<strong>in</strong>st the often taken for granted premise that idioms are unanalysable bits of lexicon,<br />
the idiosyncrasy of which excludes the queries about their potential non-arbitrary foundations.<br />
Semantic Topologies as L<strong>in</strong>guistic Universals<br />
Prosorov, Oleg<br />
Russian Academy of Sciences, Petersburg<br />
prosorov@pdmi.ras.ru<br />
We consider ma<strong>in</strong>ly a written type of l<strong>in</strong>guistic communication <strong>in</strong> some unspecified natural<br />
language, say English, French, German, Russian, <strong>and</strong> so its basic units are texts. We consider<br />
only texts written with good grace <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tended for human underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g, called admissible.