02.12.2012 Views

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section J: Semantics / Cognition <strong>10</strong>9<br />

2. When analyz<strong>in</strong>g semantic peculiarities of parametrical adjectives, it is of vital<br />

importance to take <strong>in</strong>to consideration a pragmatic factor of the observer <strong>and</strong> the<br />

strategy of measur<strong>in</strong>g the object. The observer can occupy different positions <strong>in</strong><br />

respect to the perceived object <strong>and</strong> the observer’s perspective determ<strong>in</strong>es the direction<br />

of his look . Thus the object is perceived from different angles: from above or from<br />

below, from <strong>in</strong>side or outside. Different dimensions can be ascribed to one <strong>and</strong> the<br />

same object accord<strong>in</strong>g to the position of the observer <strong>in</strong> space relatively to this object.<br />

Vertical dimension of a big conta<strong>in</strong>er can be called height, if the observer is outside it<br />

<strong>and</strong> depth if the observer looks <strong>in</strong>side this conta<strong>in</strong>er from above ( a high vase, a deep<br />

vase, a high barrel, a deep barrel ).<br />

3. Among basic notions, play<strong>in</strong>g an important role <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation of parametrical<br />

characteristics of objects is the notion of norm. Norm st<strong>and</strong>ards are different for<br />

different objects (a deep raven <strong>and</strong> a deep wr<strong>in</strong>kle are <strong>in</strong>comparable). Names of some<br />

objects with st<strong>and</strong>ard parameters do not comb<strong>in</strong>e with parametrical adjectives ( *a<br />

long /wide/ thick dollar; *a long/ thick/ wide bacteria).<br />

4. The parametrical adjectives high, wide, long, thick <strong>and</strong> deep <strong>and</strong> their<br />

nom<strong>in</strong>alizations height, width, length, thickness, <strong>and</strong> depth refer to dimensions of<br />

objects measured along <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic <strong>and</strong> environmental axes, sometimes with reference<br />

to verticality or horizontality<br />

For <strong>in</strong>stance, length is extensional – it specifies the extent of an object that can be both<br />

horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical (long curta<strong>in</strong>s, long tunnel). Height is specified by environmental<br />

axes ( gravitational or contextual) <strong>and</strong> is applied to vertically oriented objects ( high<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g, high mounta<strong>in</strong>).<br />

A note on epistemic patterns underly<strong>in</strong>g the selected English<br />

idioms related to human body<br />

Kuzniak, Marek<br />

University of Wroclaw, Pol<strong>and</strong><br />

kuzniak@uni.wroc.pl<br />

The goal of the paper is to analyse a sample of 95 r<strong>and</strong>omly selected human body-part English<br />

idioms from the perspective of the epistemic orig<strong>in</strong>s that underlie them. By epistemic orig<strong>in</strong>s is<br />

meant the folk knowledge (schematically represented by the set of <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g pre-conceptual<br />

image-schema) shared by language users that is believed to directly relate to the evidenced<br />

orig<strong>in</strong> of a particular idiomatic expression. The aim of the analysis will, then, be to uncover<br />

cognitive-axiological epistemic patterns underly<strong>in</strong>g the quoted etymology of the idiom as<br />

relevant for its conventionalised dictionary mean<strong>in</strong>g. The discussed idioms will be organized<br />

<strong>in</strong>to subsets along the criteria that emerge out of the research. The ambition of the paper will be<br />

to argue aga<strong>in</strong>st the often taken for granted premise that idioms are unanalysable bits of lexicon,<br />

the idiosyncrasy of which excludes the queries about their potential non-arbitrary foundations.<br />

Semantic Topologies as L<strong>in</strong>guistic Universals<br />

Prosorov, Oleg<br />

Russian Academy of Sciences, Petersburg<br />

prosorov@pdmi.ras.ru<br />

We consider ma<strong>in</strong>ly a written type of l<strong>in</strong>guistic communication <strong>in</strong> some unspecified natural<br />

language, say English, French, German, Russian, <strong>and</strong> so its basic units are texts. We consider<br />

only texts written with good grace <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tended for human underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g, called admissible.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!