Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...
Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...
Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Workshop 2 – Anc 153<br />
Adjust<strong>in</strong>g to communication <strong>in</strong> new contexts:<br />
the use of compliments by Burundians <strong>in</strong> the Diaspora<br />
Nizonkiza, Deogratias<br />
University of Mons-Ha<strong>in</strong>aut, Belgium<br />
nizondeo@yahoo.fr<br />
Theories of communication acknowledge that communication is a complex phenomenon<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the boundaries of universalism <strong>and</strong> relativism (Meunier & Peraya, 2004:31).<br />
Communication is achieved by means of languages that are held to be vital factors for social<br />
cohesion <strong>and</strong> social <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>and</strong> each language has its own specificities that dist<strong>in</strong>guish it<br />
from others <strong>and</strong> that are characteristic of the people who use it. Thus, Lev<strong>in</strong>son (1983:45)<br />
rightly observes that <strong>in</strong>teraction between members of a given l<strong>in</strong>guistic community is subject<br />
to ritual constra<strong>in</strong>ts, both social <strong>and</strong> cultural. In addition to these social <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts that are peculiar to each language, there are language universals that are common<br />
to most cultures if not all. In this respect, Lev<strong>in</strong>son (1983:45-46) upholds that “there are pancultural<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>ciples govern<strong>in</strong>g the production of polite or socially appropriate <strong>in</strong>teraction, <strong>and</strong><br />
these can be shown to have systematic effects on the l<strong>in</strong>guistic structure of many languages.”<br />
The present paper analyses the attitude of Burundians of the Diaspora liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Belgium vis-àvis<br />
compliments. The aim is to see if their attitude to compliments has changed given that<br />
they now live <strong>in</strong> a foreign country (Belgium) <strong>and</strong> speak a new variety of the colonial language<br />
French, different from the one spoken <strong>in</strong> Burundi. Burundians generally are repulsive to<br />
compliments. Western cultures on the other h<strong>and</strong> are quite receptive to compliments.<br />
Burundians <strong>in</strong> Belgium are faced with several cultural tensions between their <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />
attitudes built on the African culture <strong>and</strong> their present experience <strong>in</strong> Europe. My assumption<br />
here is that Burundians’ negative attitude to compliments is a preservation of their tradition,<br />
but the more years they spend <strong>in</strong> Belgium, the more they become receptive to the<br />
compliments. The second assumption that is corollary to the first is that Burundians tend to<br />
praise others <strong>and</strong> generally stay away from self praise.<br />
This study was conducted on four different groups of Burundians follow<strong>in</strong>g the number of<br />
years they have lived <strong>in</strong> Belgium. The prelim<strong>in</strong>ary tests revealed that those who have spent<br />
over ten years are more receptive to compliments. This shows a process of cultural adaptation.<br />
Politeness <strong>and</strong> requests <strong>in</strong> Xhosa drama<br />
Nomsa Satyo<br />
Stellenbosch University, South Africa<br />
pns@sun.ac.za<br />
Brown <strong>and</strong> Lev<strong>in</strong>son (1978) expla<strong>in</strong> that People at times engage <strong>in</strong> actions, which threaten<br />
face, <strong>and</strong> they make three assumptions about how actions threaten face:<br />
a. Face threats arise from <strong>in</strong>dividual speech acts <strong>and</strong> can be understood without<br />
analys<strong>in</strong>g larger discourse units.<br />
b. Classes of speech acts threaten only one type of face. There are acts that threaten only<br />
negative face <strong>and</strong> those that threaten positive face.<br />
c. Any actions are <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic face-threaten<strong>in</strong>g acts which run contrary to the face wants of<br />
the addressee <strong>and</strong> /or the speaker. To justify this assumption they rely on the analysis<br />
of Searle (1969) of how speech acts are def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> created through constitutive rules,<br />
such as s<strong>in</strong>cerity conditions.