02.12.2012 Views

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Workshop 2 – Anc 153<br />

Adjust<strong>in</strong>g to communication <strong>in</strong> new contexts:<br />

the use of compliments by Burundians <strong>in</strong> the Diaspora<br />

Nizonkiza, Deogratias<br />

University of Mons-Ha<strong>in</strong>aut, Belgium<br />

nizondeo@yahoo.fr<br />

Theories of communication acknowledge that communication is a complex phenomenon<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the boundaries of universalism <strong>and</strong> relativism (Meunier & Peraya, 2004:31).<br />

Communication is achieved by means of languages that are held to be vital factors for social<br />

cohesion <strong>and</strong> social <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>and</strong> each language has its own specificities that dist<strong>in</strong>guish it<br />

from others <strong>and</strong> that are characteristic of the people who use it. Thus, Lev<strong>in</strong>son (1983:45)<br />

rightly observes that <strong>in</strong>teraction between members of a given l<strong>in</strong>guistic community is subject<br />

to ritual constra<strong>in</strong>ts, both social <strong>and</strong> cultural. In addition to these social <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts that are peculiar to each language, there are language universals that are common<br />

to most cultures if not all. In this respect, Lev<strong>in</strong>son (1983:45-46) upholds that “there are pancultural<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciples govern<strong>in</strong>g the production of polite or socially appropriate <strong>in</strong>teraction, <strong>and</strong><br />

these can be shown to have systematic effects on the l<strong>in</strong>guistic structure of many languages.”<br />

The present paper analyses the attitude of Burundians of the Diaspora liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Belgium vis-àvis<br />

compliments. The aim is to see if their attitude to compliments has changed given that<br />

they now live <strong>in</strong> a foreign country (Belgium) <strong>and</strong> speak a new variety of the colonial language<br />

French, different from the one spoken <strong>in</strong> Burundi. Burundians generally are repulsive to<br />

compliments. Western cultures on the other h<strong>and</strong> are quite receptive to compliments.<br />

Burundians <strong>in</strong> Belgium are faced with several cultural tensions between their <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

attitudes built on the African culture <strong>and</strong> their present experience <strong>in</strong> Europe. My assumption<br />

here is that Burundians’ negative attitude to compliments is a preservation of their tradition,<br />

but the more years they spend <strong>in</strong> Belgium, the more they become receptive to the<br />

compliments. The second assumption that is corollary to the first is that Burundians tend to<br />

praise others <strong>and</strong> generally stay away from self praise.<br />

This study was conducted on four different groups of Burundians follow<strong>in</strong>g the number of<br />

years they have lived <strong>in</strong> Belgium. The prelim<strong>in</strong>ary tests revealed that those who have spent<br />

over ten years are more receptive to compliments. This shows a process of cultural adaptation.<br />

Politeness <strong>and</strong> requests <strong>in</strong> Xhosa drama<br />

Nomsa Satyo<br />

Stellenbosch University, South Africa<br />

pns@sun.ac.za<br />

Brown <strong>and</strong> Lev<strong>in</strong>son (1978) expla<strong>in</strong> that People at times engage <strong>in</strong> actions, which threaten<br />

face, <strong>and</strong> they make three assumptions about how actions threaten face:<br />

a. Face threats arise from <strong>in</strong>dividual speech acts <strong>and</strong> can be understood without<br />

analys<strong>in</strong>g larger discourse units.<br />

b. Classes of speech acts threaten only one type of face. There are acts that threaten only<br />

negative face <strong>and</strong> those that threaten positive face.<br />

c. Any actions are <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic face-threaten<strong>in</strong>g acts which run contrary to the face wants of<br />

the addressee <strong>and</strong> /or the speaker. To justify this assumption they rely on the analysis<br />

of Searle (1969) of how speech acts are def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> created through constitutive rules,<br />

such as s<strong>in</strong>cerity conditions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!