02.12.2012 Views

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Wednesday, August 30, 2006<br />

Section D: Pronouns<br />

Conference room: GW1 A0150<br />

11:30–12:00 Acuña Fariña, Juan Carlos (University of Santiago de Compostela, Spa<strong>in</strong>)<br />

Activeness <strong>and</strong> the M<strong>in</strong>imal Cha<strong>in</strong> Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple: Spanish se reflexives, passives<br />

<strong>and</strong> impersonals do not wait even for m<strong>in</strong>imal cha<strong>in</strong>s<br />

12:00–12:30 Cerrón-Palom<strong>in</strong>o López, Alvaro (University of Southern California)<br />

Subject Resumptive Pronouns <strong>in</strong> Spanish Relative Clauses: <strong>Universalism</strong> or<br />

<strong>Relativism</strong>?<br />

12:30–13:00 Helmbrecht, Johannes (Univeristy of Erfurt)<br />

Personal pronouns - a corpus analysis <strong>and</strong> its implications for language<br />

typology<br />

Lunch break<br />

15:00–15:30 Siewierska, Anna (Lancaster University) / Hollmann, Willem (Lancaster<br />

University)<br />

Expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the my vs. me variation <strong>in</strong> Lancashire dialect: a usage-based<br />

grammar.<br />

15:30–16:00 Lai, Vicky Tzuy<strong>in</strong> (University of Colorado, Boulder)<br />

Pragmatic Functions of First Person S<strong>in</strong>gular Pronouns <strong>in</strong> Classical Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

16:00–16:30 Razímová, Magda (Charles University, Prague)<br />

System of Pronom<strong>in</strong>al Words <strong>in</strong> Czech with Respect to German <strong>and</strong> English*<br />

Activeness <strong>and</strong> the M<strong>in</strong>imal Cha<strong>in</strong> Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple:<br />

Spanish se reflexives, passives <strong>and</strong> impersonals do not wait even<br />

for m<strong>in</strong>imal cha<strong>in</strong>s<br />

Acuña Fariña, Juan Carlos<br />

University of Santiago de Compostela, Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

iacanoe@usc.es<br />

De V<strong>in</strong>cenzi´s (1991, 1996, 1998) M<strong>in</strong>imal Cha<strong>in</strong> Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple (MCP) postulates a preference by<br />

the human parser to opt for structures with no movement over compet<strong>in</strong>g structures with<br />

(hypothesized) movement. The general idea of the MCP is that displacement is costly for the<br />

m<strong>in</strong>d because it delays phrasal packag<strong>in</strong>g. The reason for this is that resources need to be<br />

spent on ‘undo<strong>in</strong>g’ movement <strong>and</strong> reconstruct<strong>in</strong>g an underly<strong>in</strong>g SVO template before the<br />

right who-did-what-to-whom order can be sent to a semantic component for post-syntactic<br />

analysis. As conceived, the MCP works as follows: on recognis<strong>in</strong>g a gap the parser <strong>in</strong>itiates<br />

an active search for a filler <strong>and</strong> preferentially construes any displaced phrase as one. Here I<br />

argue that the activeness of an MCP type of processor is unnecessarily constra<strong>in</strong>ed by the<br />

MCP grant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>visibility to any phrase that occupies a lawful deep structure position. Data

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!