02.12.2012 Views

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42 Sections<br />

ostbaltischen Futurs bekommt e<strong>in</strong>e natürliche Erklärung, wenn man für die Bildung auf<br />

urbaltisch *-sya- mit desiderativer Modalität rechnet, die Bildung auf urbaltisch *-s- dagegen<br />

auf e<strong>in</strong> futurisches Jussiv zurückführt. Aus dieser Hypothese ergeben sich wichtige<br />

Konsequenzen für das System der urbaltischen Konjugation und se<strong>in</strong>e Vorgeschichte.<br />

On transcategorization<br />

Jezek, Elisabetta / Ramat, Paolo<br />

University of Pavia / University of Pavia<br />

jezek@unipv.it;paoram@unipv.it<br />

Our theoretical start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t is that the Parts-of-speech (PoS) embodied by the categories of<br />

grammar (traditionally called ‘partes orationis’) are the result of the analysis of the l<strong>in</strong>guist.<br />

As such they are universal concepts, <strong>and</strong> their def<strong>in</strong>ition has to be universally, i.e crossl<strong>in</strong>guistically,<br />

valid: an ADV must have such <strong>and</strong> such def<strong>in</strong>itional property, such <strong>and</strong> such<br />

morphosyntactic behaviour; but this does not mean that ADVs must be present <strong>in</strong> all<br />

languages, though languages must have some way to modify a verb as well as other PoS. The<br />

implementation of the category (‘part-of-speech’) ADV need not be universal. Another<br />

important prelim<strong>in</strong>ary po<strong>in</strong>t is that there are items which belong to the core of a category <strong>and</strong><br />

items which are more peripheral: e.g. yellow as ADJ vs. dog as Noun; green, on the contrary,<br />

may be metonymically used also as Noun : ‘an area planted with grass’.<br />

We def<strong>in</strong>e transcategorization (TC) the phenomenon accord<strong>in</strong>g to which l<strong>in</strong>guistic elements<br />

(lexemes <strong>and</strong> phrases) are used with different functions without any superficial modification<br />

of their form. This means that TC is a functional reanalysis based on (morpho)syntactic<br />

context. Transcategorized elements are employed <strong>in</strong> different syntactic environments which<br />

are different from the orig<strong>in</strong>al one. In this way, verbs may become adpositions (as Ch<strong>in</strong>. yong<br />

“to use” <strong>and</strong> “with”; Ewe bé “to say” <strong>and</strong> complementizer), adjectives may be used as adverbs<br />

(as Germ. schön: sie ist schön “good look<strong>in</strong>g” <strong>and</strong> sie s<strong>in</strong>gt schön “<strong>in</strong> a nice way” or It. forte<br />

“strong” <strong>and</strong> “strongly”), verbs may be used as nouns (as Engl. he likes to run <strong>and</strong> he went for<br />

a run), etc. In such cases we may speak of ‘categorial flexibility’.<br />

The general aim of the paper is to improve the description of TC processes both<br />

synchronically <strong>and</strong> diachronically <strong>and</strong>, consequently, to sketch a possible typology of TCs.<br />

We discuss many <strong>in</strong>stances <strong>and</strong> various types of TC: some of them are frequent, others less<br />

frequent <strong>and</strong> of other possible TCs we have no or very rare examples.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, attention is paid to where (i.e. <strong>in</strong> which language type) TC is/can be more operative.<br />

Historical l<strong>in</strong>guistics:<br />

Obsolete lexemes <strong>and</strong> desemantized fossilized syntagmata<br />

Leschber, Cor<strong>in</strong>na<br />

Viadr<strong>in</strong>a-University Frankfurt (Oder)<br />

cor<strong>in</strong>na@leschber.com<br />

In an <strong>in</strong>vestigation of word material of unknown etymology several characteristics were<br />

discovered:<br />

• Of the denotations of as yet unknown etymological classification, the majority are<br />

those attested <strong>in</strong> isolated, <strong>in</strong>accessible areas, frequently mounta<strong>in</strong> regions.<br />

• Mounta<strong>in</strong> ranges protect relic vocabulary from <strong>in</strong>novations.<br />

• In part, this vocabulary can be def<strong>in</strong>ed as orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from unknown contact languages<br />

or substrata languages, about which we still know very little.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!