Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...
Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...
Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
42 Sections<br />
ostbaltischen Futurs bekommt e<strong>in</strong>e natürliche Erklärung, wenn man für die Bildung auf<br />
urbaltisch *-sya- mit desiderativer Modalität rechnet, die Bildung auf urbaltisch *-s- dagegen<br />
auf e<strong>in</strong> futurisches Jussiv zurückführt. Aus dieser Hypothese ergeben sich wichtige<br />
Konsequenzen für das System der urbaltischen Konjugation und se<strong>in</strong>e Vorgeschichte.<br />
On transcategorization<br />
Jezek, Elisabetta / Ramat, Paolo<br />
University of Pavia / University of Pavia<br />
jezek@unipv.it;paoram@unipv.it<br />
Our theoretical start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t is that the Parts-of-speech (PoS) embodied by the categories of<br />
grammar (traditionally called ‘partes orationis’) are the result of the analysis of the l<strong>in</strong>guist.<br />
As such they are universal concepts, <strong>and</strong> their def<strong>in</strong>ition has to be universally, i.e crossl<strong>in</strong>guistically,<br />
valid: an ADV must have such <strong>and</strong> such def<strong>in</strong>itional property, such <strong>and</strong> such<br />
morphosyntactic behaviour; but this does not mean that ADVs must be present <strong>in</strong> all<br />
languages, though languages must have some way to modify a verb as well as other PoS. The<br />
implementation of the category (‘part-of-speech’) ADV need not be universal. Another<br />
important prelim<strong>in</strong>ary po<strong>in</strong>t is that there are items which belong to the core of a category <strong>and</strong><br />
items which are more peripheral: e.g. yellow as ADJ vs. dog as Noun; green, on the contrary,<br />
may be metonymically used also as Noun : ‘an area planted with grass’.<br />
We def<strong>in</strong>e transcategorization (TC) the phenomenon accord<strong>in</strong>g to which l<strong>in</strong>guistic elements<br />
(lexemes <strong>and</strong> phrases) are used with different functions without any superficial modification<br />
of their form. This means that TC is a functional reanalysis based on (morpho)syntactic<br />
context. Transcategorized elements are employed <strong>in</strong> different syntactic environments which<br />
are different from the orig<strong>in</strong>al one. In this way, verbs may become adpositions (as Ch<strong>in</strong>. yong<br />
“to use” <strong>and</strong> “with”; Ewe bé “to say” <strong>and</strong> complementizer), adjectives may be used as adverbs<br />
(as Germ. schön: sie ist schön “good look<strong>in</strong>g” <strong>and</strong> sie s<strong>in</strong>gt schön “<strong>in</strong> a nice way” or It. forte<br />
“strong” <strong>and</strong> “strongly”), verbs may be used as nouns (as Engl. he likes to run <strong>and</strong> he went for<br />
a run), etc. In such cases we may speak of ‘categorial flexibility’.<br />
The general aim of the paper is to improve the description of TC processes both<br />
synchronically <strong>and</strong> diachronically <strong>and</strong>, consequently, to sketch a possible typology of TCs.<br />
We discuss many <strong>in</strong>stances <strong>and</strong> various types of TC: some of them are frequent, others less<br />
frequent <strong>and</strong> of other possible TCs we have no or very rare examples.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ally, attention is paid to where (i.e. <strong>in</strong> which language type) TC is/can be more operative.<br />
Historical l<strong>in</strong>guistics:<br />
Obsolete lexemes <strong>and</strong> desemantized fossilized syntagmata<br />
Leschber, Cor<strong>in</strong>na<br />
Viadr<strong>in</strong>a-University Frankfurt (Oder)<br />
cor<strong>in</strong>na@leschber.com<br />
In an <strong>in</strong>vestigation of word material of unknown etymology several characteristics were<br />
discovered:<br />
• Of the denotations of as yet unknown etymological classification, the majority are<br />
those attested <strong>in</strong> isolated, <strong>in</strong>accessible areas, frequently mounta<strong>in</strong> regions.<br />
• Mounta<strong>in</strong> ranges protect relic vocabulary from <strong>in</strong>novations.<br />
• In part, this vocabulary can be def<strong>in</strong>ed as orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from unknown contact languages<br />
or substrata languages, about which we still know very little.