02.12.2012 Views

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section H: Syntax 91<br />

Discourse conditions for focus <strong>in</strong> Yucatec Maya:<br />

evidence from experimental data<br />

Skopeteas, Stavros / Verhoeven, Elisabeth<br />

University of Potsdam / University of Bremen<br />

skopetea@rz.uni-potsdam.de;elisabeth.verhoeven@uni-erfurt.de<br />

In Yucatec Maya constituent focus is encoded through movement to a preverbal focus<br />

position <strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong> case of agent focus, additionally through a special verb form (see Bricker<br />

1979, Tonhauser 2003).<br />

In this paper we present two speech production experiments that have been performed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

field <strong>in</strong> order to localize the discourse conditions <strong>in</strong> which native speakers (n=16) use these<br />

focus constructions: (a) a dialogue-based experiment which makes use of different question<br />

types (confirmative, rejective, selective, <strong>and</strong> completive) apply<strong>in</strong>g visual stimuli; (b) a<br />

narrative-based experiment that manipulates the distribution of given <strong>and</strong> new <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong><br />

descriptions of picture sequences.<br />

The experimental results show that focus constructions occur <strong>in</strong> all question types but their<br />

frequency correlates with the question’s power (7% of the confirmative answers, 26% of the<br />

selective ones, 20% of the corrective ones <strong>and</strong> 16% of the completive ones). In the narrative<br />

experiment, the focus construction frequently occurs to mark new <strong>in</strong>formation. This data<br />

allows for the revision of previous accounts accord<strong>in</strong>g to which the focus position <strong>in</strong> Mayan is<br />

used <strong>in</strong> contrastive contexts. Our explanation is functional, draw<strong>in</strong>g attention to the<br />

complementarity of syntax <strong>and</strong> prosody for the encod<strong>in</strong>g of discourse functions. As a tonal<br />

language, Yucatec Maya does not mark discourse functions through pitch accents, which<br />

implies that a constituent may not bear the focus feature if it does not occur <strong>in</strong> the designated<br />

focus position. The functional consequence of this typological feature is that a marked<br />

syntactic construction occurs <strong>in</strong> a wide variety of contexts. This assumption is supported<br />

cross-l<strong>in</strong>guistically, through the comparison of the Mayan data with data from languages that<br />

display both syntactic <strong>and</strong> prosodic means for the expression of focus (German, Greek, <strong>and</strong><br />

Georgian) <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> which the same experiments have been performed.<br />

References<br />

Bricker, Victoria R. (1979): “Wh-questions, relativization, <strong>and</strong> cleft<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Yucatec Maya”, <strong>in</strong>:<br />

Mart<strong>in</strong>, Laura (ed.), Papers <strong>in</strong> Mayan l<strong>in</strong>guistics. Columbia, Miss.: Lucas Brothers, <strong>10</strong>7-136.<br />

Tonhauser, Judith (2003): “F-constructions <strong>in</strong> Yucatec Maya”, <strong>in</strong>: Anderssen, Jan; Menéndez-<br />

Benito, Paula & Werle, Adam (eds.), The Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of SULA 2. Vancouver, BC:<br />

GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.<br />

The discourse basis of head-mark<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Viti, Carlotta<br />

University of Pisa<br />

carlottaviti@hotmail.com<br />

Although languages are commonly consistent <strong>in</strong> mark<strong>in</strong>g relations of dependency either on<br />

the head or on the dependent of a constituent, both head- <strong>and</strong> dependent-marked constructions<br />

can be occasionally found <strong>in</strong> the same language (Nichols 1986; 1992). In this case, it is more<br />

frequent that a head-marked construction is found <strong>in</strong> a generally dependent mark<strong>in</strong>g language<br />

rather the other way round. For example, the Indo-European languages mark subject<br />

agreement on the verb, i.e. on the head of the clause, but they encode possessum, as well as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!