universidade federal de santa catarina pós-graduação em letras ...

177[C#10] (Sub-function 9) The book contains some inconsistencies. In Chapter 7,Surján employs commutators rather than anticommutators for Fermion creatianand annihilation operators...Several chapters are quite interesting. Chapter 10 shows that ... Chapter 13 is aconcise discussion of ... The chapters on the Hellmann-Feynmann theorem andintermolecular interactions are really thought-provoking.[L#19] (Sub-function 9) The book has many good points. It is the mostcomprehensive statement to date of the Haskins group's position, and it is clearlyand enthusiastically written. Each chapter scrupulously explores the practical aswell as the theoretical implications of the research that it deals with. There is alsoa great deal that will be new to many readers.[E#7] (Sub-function 9) There are few errors or weaknesses — of fact or ofanalysis. I can never remember what the difference is between a publiccorporation and a nationalized industry, but there is one, and recalling it wouldhave made the table of state-owned industry on p. 141 comprehensive. ...And for me, at least, there are few errors or weaknesses of opinion. The earlyprogramme of privatization was, as Vickers and Yarrow suggest, embarked onwith insufficient willingness either to impose an effective regulatory structure orto restructure the industry to make that regulation less necessary. ...But as theprogramme has developed, there is evidence that the government has learnt fromits mistakes and its critics.(b) By indicating grounds for evaluation with lexical phrases such as ‘due to’, ‘as aresult of’. The term ‘grounds’ loosely relates to the concept of ‘warrant’ in Toulmin’s(1958) discussion on the construction of arguments.Toulmin (ibid.:97) argues that any responsible assertion, normally requires somefacts that support its validity. Toulmin’s is basically a tripartite model of how argumentsare constructed. Its three basic parts are: claim, data, and warrant. If Toulmin’s model isfollowed, in an evaluative move (such as Move 3), one can expect to find these threeparts of the argument. Thus, in [L#1] below, the Claim would be the evaluation in the