universidade federal de santa catarina pós-graduação em letras ...

2256.2.3 Differences in the frequency of sub-functionsVariation across disciplines can also be examined considering the extent to whichtexts in each discipline show adherence to the model of the rhetorical organization of thegenre (Figure 5-2 in Chapter 5). The higher the frequency for each sub-function, themore the texts corresponded to the model. The results below in Table 6-3 show thefrequency of occurrence of each sub-function across disciplines in percentages. Highestpercentages for each sub-function are underlined in bold and second highest percentagesare marked with a star.Table 6-Erro! Apenas o documento principal.- Distribution of sub-functions perdiscipline in percentagesSub-function (%)Move 1 2 3 4SubfunctionChemistryLinguisticsEconomics1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1030 35* 15 20 75 80 80 50 85 95*80 45 20* 40 65 70* 100 50 90* 10065* 20 25 30* 70* 50 90* 15 100 95*The higher percentages in linguistics and economics indicate that their texts havemore sub-functions and, between the two, linguistics produces BRs with higherpercentages more consistently than economics. In nine out of ten columns, Subfunctions1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, the percentages for linguistics are either the highest