universidade federal de santa catarina pós-graduação em letras ...

198(b) Explicit lexemes in the form of superlative expressions, e.g., (one of) the most,major, best, worst, greatest part/chapter/section in the book;(c) Validity markers, e.g., (verbal and non-verbal modal constructions)‘should/would + have + [Verb Participle]’, ‘perhaps’, ‘certainly’, ‘maybe’;(d) Attitude markers, e.g., ‘especially’, ‘unfortunately’, ‘surprising(ly)’, ‘simply’,‘clearly’, ‘obviously’, ‘admirably’, ’rather’, ‘extremely’, ‘(more) importantly’;(e) Explicit lexemes that indicate the special status of certain parts of the book,e.g., ‘special’, ‘distinguish’, ‘only’.For Move 4, in the context of the last paragraph, besides the title and the author’sname, certain explicit lexemes were investigated expressing:(a) Summarizing conclusion or totalization, e.g., ‘to sum up’, ‘insum(mary)/conclusion’, ‘finally’, ‘all in all’, ‘as a whole’;(b) Adversative conclusion, e.g., ‘despite/in spite of’, ‘nevertheless’;(c) Logical conclusion, e.g., ‘thus’, ‘so’;(d) Future temporal orientation, e.g., ‘will’;(e) Definitive recommendation, e.g., ‘recommend’.A summary of the results obtained in the analysis with the microconcord programis presented in Table 5-8 ix . The numbers (N) and percentages (%) represent thedistribution of the linguistic clues in the positions stipulated for each move in theremaining 120 texts.