universidade federal de santa catarina pós-graduação em letras ...

187[E#5] (Sub-function 10B) Altogether this is a stimulating book, but what it maystimulate are ideas that may depart in considerable measure from those presentedin it.The type of evaluation provided by Move 4 is self-referring, i.e., the finalevaluation in the text is constructed in view of what has been formerly said about thepublication along the BR, especially the evaluation contained in the preceding Move 3.The idea of reference to the previous discourse is conveyed:(b) By indicating logical conclusion with explicit lexemes such as ‘therefore’,‘thus’:[C#2] (Sub-function 10B) This text is therefore likely to be of interest to thosewanting access to a broader variety of monolayer science than is generally foundin standard texts.[L#1] (Sub-function 10B) Thus, it would be unfair to dismiss the book out ofhand even with the shortcomings that have been discussed.[E#12] (Sub-function 10) This, then, is a book with much to recommend it.(c) By indicating adversative relationship between what is said in the body of theBR and the concluding remarks, using explicit lexemes, e.g., ‘despite’, ‘in spite of’,‘nevertheless’:[C#7] (I) (Sub-function 9) The book suffers from a few defects. Newerexperimental methods very relevant to the subject,... are not discussed; I notedonly one passing reference (...) to work using DLS. The discussion on ...is ratherweak and outmoded. The approach taken, sometimes, of discussing ...is not very